Nietzsche was better at recognizing the flawed and corrupt nature of man than any other human being has ever been, including in himself. His life's work was dedicated to trying to find a way to rise above it in an entirely self-contained, autonomous way without making oneself subservient to the will
and whim of a broader community, and then he spent his final years spiraling into syphilitic insanity, consumed by an increasing sense of self-loathing because he couldn't understand why he hadn't lived up to the impossible bar he'd set for himself.
He did pretty accurately predict the entire 20th century though.
"Atheists take all the God-given wisdom of Christianity and act as though it's a rational conclusion that anyone could have come to, which allows them to think of themselves as unbiased even as they agrandise themselves by taking credit for a cultural inheritance they explicitely reject."
I appreciate that it’s using the verbiage that atheists use to claim their superiority. They don’t understand a word of what they say in the first place, so if they want to refute this they’ll first have to teach themselves what any of the words mean, whereupon they’ll either prove inadequate in understanding the words (and fail to be able to refute it) or understand the words (and realize they can’t refute it at all).
AI really is great at echoing back what people like most about themselves. Like serving amateur philosophers their own farts and needlessly complex language.
All people need gods. To VERY few, that god can be themselves, and not have them crumble under the pressure. The rest, should they eschew gods, will simply find new gods to offload that pressure onto.
It wasn't my wrong, it was God's plan. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was the Government's policy. -> It wasn't my wrong, it's Society's inherent flaws. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was The Company's mission statement. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was the Family/Clan's decision.
It takes a truly strong person to say "yeah, all the flaws in myself are my own responsibility, every decision, every error, every slight, they're all entirely upon me, and no one else".
I know I sure as hell can't. Not 100% of the time. We all submit to the will of the Greater on occasion, if only to absolve ourselves of our own sins of our own designs. It's the height of hubris to assume we can. Literally, as hubris' origins is in assuming oneself to be as a god.
Thanks for that analysation of the phenomenon. I'm no scholar or philosopher, but I do occasionally make the connections of people making their own god to worship or blame regardless of whether they acknowledge it or not.
This literally opens with "the proposition frames..." meaning Grok is not explaining it, but rather rewording what the prompter (you?) sent to it. When making AI say silly things, please include your prompt next time, so we can see the workflow.
Holy fucking word salad.
Is there a version where the pretension is turned down from 11 to a 5 or 6?
You must have hated Nietzsche
I mean, Nietzsche hated himself too.
Fair enough
Nietzsche was better at recognizing the flawed and corrupt nature of man than any other human being has ever been, including in himself. His life's work was dedicated to trying to find a way to rise above it in an entirely self-contained, autonomous way without making oneself subservient to the will and whim of a broader community, and then he spent his final years spiraling into syphilitic insanity, consumed by an increasing sense of self-loathing because he couldn't understand why he hadn't lived up to the impossible bar he'd set for himself.
He did pretty accurately predict the entire 20th century though.
not exactly true
he hated the human nature of self destruction
"Atheists take all the God-given wisdom of Christianity and act as though it's a rational conclusion that anyone could have come to, which allows them to think of themselves as unbiased even as they agrandise themselves by taking credit for a cultural inheritance they explicitely reject."
"A fish that doesn't know its in water"
"Reddit is gay"
God will forgive them, so long as they live morally. So it's all good, as long as it is all Good.
I appreciate that it’s using the verbiage that atheists use to claim their superiority. They don’t understand a word of what they say in the first place, so if they want to refute this they’ll first have to teach themselves what any of the words mean, whereupon they’ll either prove inadequate in understanding the words (and fail to be able to refute it) or understand the words (and realize they can’t refute it at all).
AI really is great at echoing back what people like most about themselves. Like serving amateur philosophers their own farts and needlessly complex language.
There are better ways to say all of this, but it is mostly correct.
I'd bet my life that the prompt ended with, "and say it in the most pretentious, ten-dollar-wordy way possible."
Good catch lol
"Say it in a way that redditors will pretend to understand"
Grok has surpassed reddit-level intelligence.
It understands Rick and Morty??
Atheism is right but woke Atheism is replacing one insanity with a libtard faggot one.
All people need gods. To VERY few, that god can be themselves, and not have them crumble under the pressure. The rest, should they eschew gods, will simply find new gods to offload that pressure onto.
It wasn't my wrong, it was God's plan. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was the Government's policy. -> It wasn't my wrong, it's Society's inherent flaws. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was The Company's mission statement. -> It wasn't my wrong, it was the Family/Clan's decision.
It takes a truly strong person to say "yeah, all the flaws in myself are my own responsibility, every decision, every error, every slight, they're all entirely upon me, and no one else".
I know I sure as hell can't. Not 100% of the time. We all submit to the will of the Greater on occasion, if only to absolve ourselves of our own sins of our own designs. It's the height of hubris to assume we can. Literally, as hubris' origins is in assuming oneself to be as a god.
Thanks for that analysation of the phenomenon. I'm no scholar or philosopher, but I do occasionally make the connections of people making their own god to worship or blame regardless of whether they acknowledge it or not.
this reads like a reddit mod's highlighted thesaurus made into a copypasta
This literally opens with "the proposition frames..." meaning Grok is not explaining it, but rather rewording what the prompter (you?) sent to it. When making AI say silly things, please include your prompt next time, so we can see the workflow.
Just say Jew
I prefer the Diogenes theorem :)
Damn nigga I can't read Chinese