4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

"One thing’s for sure—Rock will never crack a joke at Pinkett Smith’s expense again"

Author might be an idiot.

5
f1111 5 points ago +5 / -0

Scarcity drives up the price. People will use less to save money if they can. Adding tax on top of that doesn't solve the stated problem, but maybe that's not the "problem" they're trying to solve.

4
f1111 4 points ago +6 / -2

This guy seems incredibly sus. Allegedly many others don't see it.

1
f1111 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whoever posted the poll might practice proof-reading.

All these books seems interesting, and I've read none of them, so will refrain from marking a preference.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kill all men but don't kill men who identify as women, because that would be hateful.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a boat in the photo with the name partially obscured. ODDTIME? FOODTIME?

3
f1111 3 points ago +3 / -0

How can they hate the guy they just awarded the woman of the year prize to? Twitter makes no sense.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

what fraction of the population are in these categories?

11
f1111 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's bizarre to me that node has so little to lock down what dependencies can access, especially when it's such an free-for-all. Even if you take the good advice to specify specific dependency versions, you can't be 100% sure that when you update them, what you're updating to is safe. This idiot's actions seem amateurish. I imagine more thoughtful malware goes undetected - things that scan your hard disc for password, maybe something that targets individuals through social media ids on the naughty list, etc.

Allegedly deno (node successor, but not yet as popular) does something about the user of the dependencies being aware of, or having to explicitly grant access to things like the filesystem, which seems not-stupid. If you need to use node, and so many things use it these days - you should probably run in in a VM or something, and maybe play detective a bit and try to catch malicious things.

8
f1111 8 points ago +8 / -0

"contrary to the principles of Mozilla"

The relevant principle being that biased search results should have a price tag.

7
f1111 7 points ago +7 / -0

I only use firefox because when you have a load of tabs open, it doesn't scrunch them up to fit on one page. It does seem to be run by authoritarian twats though. I should bite the bullet and close some tabs.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know whether someone who wishes to conform should say this is good, bad, that one or the other should get deported, or should just say nothing.

3
f1111 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's just frustrating that spending money takes so much more effort than earning it.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tried throwing money at this, but steam now requires my phone number to comply with some new bollocks EU regulation, even though I'm in the UK. Fucked if i'm doing that.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're an interesting bunch over there. I can't really get my head around it.

3
f1111 3 points ago +3 / -0

Adults should be able to whatever, with the exception of things like installing a nuclear bomb in their bum.

1
f1111 1 point ago +1 / -0

maybe i'll finally switch from using firefox, which doesn't appear to have any non-compromised search engine options. What's better - brave search? quant?

by borga
6
f1111 6 points ago +6 / -0

what a complete pile of shit the "free world" is becoming.

3
f1111 3 points ago +3 / -0

" some people feel pressure to show their pronouns"

This person sounds like a activist who hates "the other" and wants them to feel uncomfortable. However, allegedly there are people who are "in the closet" about their preferred special words. What about their feelings?

6
f1111 6 points ago +6 / -0

If someone were to find footage of him meeting with JK Rowling, perhaps the propaganda machine can be turned around.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›