I don't think so. I believe the original was direct to anime. It was in the era where shows were mostly created to sell toys,
But Smith, I've gotta warn you. It's not an anime. "Gundam" is kind of like Final Fantasy. There's 50+ series, movies, and miniseries, but they're in a dozen different, completely isolated continuities. If you're looking for the classic/main continuity, you're going to want to focus on "Universal Century (UC)" stuff... which is still 20+ entries.
If you're looking for the thing that started it all in '79, the original 43 ep series or the three compilation movies.
given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.
payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
I'm sure this guy is every bit the scumbag they make him out to be. He's willingly had a (D) next to his name after all.
But it's interesting.
Court documents reveal Fairfax was penniless when he murdered his wife and then killed himself, carrying over $750,000 in debt when she filed for divorce last July.
A pal told The Post that he found himself unable to get a job or legal clients after the sex assault claims that derailed his political career. Financial filings reveal his legal practice made more than $400,000 in 2023, only $11,000 in 2024 and had earned $0 for 2025.
That didn’t sit well with wife Cerina, who was a successful dentist and had real estate holdings, according to the friend.
“She had grown up very poor and it was very important to her to have stable financial stability … and a good home for her children,” the source added.
“And when… he couldn’t get clients, he couldn’t get work, I think that’s what started the downhill of the marriage itself,” the source also said.
From what I can find, there were never any criminal charges filed or even lawsuits. Two women from his past popped up 2019, made accusations, caused him to be unable to make a living, and the lack of extra money beyond her own success "didn't sit well with wife."
The toxicity is caused by the fibers becoming lodged in the lungs. The tissue stiffens, which keeps you from breathing properly.
AFAIK, it's only dangerous internally but unless it's sealed up in something else, it can produce dust.
Dog counters stick.
But seriously, why bother? It's a stick.
Approach
"Drop the stick"
"No"
"Bzzzzzzzzzt"
Cuff
Was there some other weapon (or report thereof) we don't see that justifies using a car as a shield with a 100 foot stand off?
I don't remember much about this guy, but if you think an ex-wife in the middle of divorce proceedings is a reputable source for anything you're a kind of retarded that can't be fixed.
Court exhibits also include photos of his medication which includes quetiapine which is typically prescribed for schizophrenia
Next to a sleep med, a SSRI, another sleep med, and an anti-anxiety med. Other than schizophrenia, Quetiapine is used for depression, bipolar, and off-label as a sleep aid. Which seem more in line with the other 4 pictured than schizophrenia.
>threats to your family
>I have seen him take many illegal drugs
>hostile views about women
This is like a speedrun of divorce accusations. The only thing that's odd is the accusation of abusing someone else's children instead of theirs.
"These things are all bad." That's as deep as it gets.
They say the IDF's actions are bad because that's the topic. They relate it to the killing of jews to point out Israel's hypocrisy.
They throw in "wartime killings" to make it broader. Japan is mentioned because Worst Korea can't go 5 minutes without complaining about Japan.
The second M is apparently for "murdered"
Oh. That's what this is? Holy fuck.
They took the "Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls" talking point and realized that they're Canadian leftists. They can't just say "Women and Girls!" What about the other 72 genders? So they stuck a pride parade to the end of it.
Turning discussion of some actual victims into a fucking meme for virtue signal points. Oh and here's a hint: it's the rampant substance abuse in that population. That's the cause of the disproportionate number of "missing and murdered" women.
A retrospective of this conversation:
- You make an odd claim that a drug aimed at preventing HIV infection is used by people who are trying to contract HIV.
- I say that makes no sense and it's used by people who engage in high-risk behaviors to escape accountability.
- You say no one is doing that.
- I say that people are indeed doing that. Admittedly a study about discussion isn't the most solid proof, but if you think they aren't engaging in degenerate high-risk activities, your head is buried in the sand.
- You respond by claiming that anonymous sex isn't a thing and everyone involved in that kind of thing isn't a stranger? Then try to deflect by saying that most people don't participate in orgies. Even though you know this whole conversation is in the context of PrEP users.
- I make fun of you being retarded.
- You drop a non-sequitur that most people don't use PrEP. Even though you know this whole conversation is in the context of PrEP users.
Why are you so hellbent on trying to claim that these drugs aren't being used by promiscuous gays to avoid HIV?
What point are you even trying to make? That fags have a complicated and surprising morality?
I'm making the opposite of that point. You're just illiterate.
no one is doing that.
Such optimism. You overestimate people. Someone did a study to look at how frequently PrEP is even discussed.
At the within level (time-varying factors), participants were more likely to ask partners about PrEP during time periods where they reported more male sexual partners, AOR = 2.89 (0.68), p < .001, and engagement in group or party sex, AOR = 1.99 (0.43), p = .001.
"Twice as likely to discuss it before an orgy." They see it as a magic shield for maximum-risk behavior. They are absolutely doing it. Of course the statistics also showed Blacks cared less about prevention. The authors of the study blamed racism for this, so you know the study has a woke bias and isn't overstating the terrible decisions being made by gays.
No. In the theory of OP but with that context, your enemy would be the admissions boards and people writing the scholarships. More so than the students who benefited from those policies. The people who are creating the policies that are chiefly responsible.
Up to you if that's correct or not but it's not to hard to get to the general case of the people creating the policies rather than fixating on "the Fed" literally.
No one is saying that the blue-haired freak isn't an enemy. But fighting against her changes little because no one actually listens to her in the first place. She's a tool.