Yeah this is vtuber related but this is also leads into discussion of how bad YouTube's strike system is and how it's being abused by malicious actors.
This probably began with her clip channel, a channel just dedicated to making clips out of her stream, being struck down out of nowhere. She herself said on stream she won't fight it conventionally because she would have to give her address as part of the counter claim so she's getting Vshojo her agency to help get it back.
Fast foward to a few hours ago, as she's still hosting a subathon on Twitch, her entire MAIN Youtube channel gets terminated and Vshojo lawyers are now getting involved.
I only have two explanations on this:
-
There's a malicious actor within YouTube targeting vtubers for some reason (a lot have been getting random bans for a while) and decided to ban her channel on a Friday so it wouldn't be resolved till Monday (similar to what Sony did with Helldivers 2 PSN requirement)
-
A malicious actor REALLY wants to dox Ironmouse and is trying to use YouTube's copyright system to get it in the counter claim.
The reason she's avoiding giving her address is she has fucking Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) meaning she can't simply leave ger home if some freak learns her address and stalks her plus she lives with her now getting elderly parents. But this will probably blow up more since she's THE biggest vtuber streamer (nearly the biggest female streamer) in the world so already the pressure is building against Youtube for this.
Maybe this'll go to a court case where Youtube is forced to defend banning a streamer with CVID with no strikes or maybe on Monday her channels get restored and someone is secretly fired, either way this is probably the biggest example of the war on vtubers.
Edit: adding this as a note on the original than a new post, as of 23/09/2024 both her main and VOD channels are back, seems like the banning of her main on Friday WAS like Sony and Helldivers 2 and they immediately returned all her channels back on Monday. Doubt the people responsible will be punished though.
YouTube really needs to fix their moderation system. Seems like you can't go a day without some story of it being abused.
You're assuming that their moderation system is broken and not working as intended.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
Let extremists on all sides mass report to get automated bans, then only 'fix the mistake' with human intervention for lefty degenerates.
The only people who can afford to be terminally online nowadays are brain (and crotch) rotted troons fully supported by the state. The glory days of /b/ raids are long in the past.
I doubt they will till either government gets involved or they lose a court case that opens them up to MASSIVE liability if they keep the status quo.
The current system benefits them too much in getting rid of 'dangerous voices'
If it gets to the point someone does have to step in it will likely be far too late for YouTube to survive. This could end up like Perfect Blue or an actual death and with a high profile enough victim it would [rightfully] sink them.
They won't accept moderating less. In order the pay as few humans as possible for moderation, they use automated systems based on numbers or reports.
Youtube also has several flags for no-no words that trigger an automatic suspension on the specific content flagged, for manual authorization.
They also have ''danger'' words that trigger automatic banners leading to government propaganda.
Copyright claim? Bam. Automatic demonetized video.
It was a false claim, or obvious Fair Use? Good luck getting through YT to challenge the claim.
You have to prove you did nothing wrong rather than the accuser proving you did something wrong.
As of now, Youtube has no incentive to stop acting like that. Either they lose a precedent-setting court case in the USA ( unlikely when it comes to copyrights, possible when it comes to other suspensions based on reports ).
Youtube also has baked-in double-standarts, where the ''Authoritative Sources'' such as mainstream media channels being allowed to publish things that will get you suspended if you do. Such as video evidence of a violent attack.
You might potentially get away with it if you ''Fair Use'' your way in by posting a snipet of a Mainstream Media video, making sure the Mainstream Media is the only one able to break certain stories, and frame them a certain way.
Because ''safety and inclusion'', of course. Three-Letter-Agencies sure had their say in that.
What do you mean for manual authorization?
It means they are insta-blocked until a human can watch it and approve it.
Oh, yeah, do they document what you can't say now, or is this still word of mouth?
Working as intended. Service the narrative and (try) to make money while doing it.