but I think you're giving them TOO much credit.
It's not about credit. It's about recognizing that your enemies are on both sides. This is not something that will "go away" or "be defeated" by a change of tie colors in the white house.
how much they can control the Muslims to demoralise the native population, in the UK at least
You're making my exact point for me. You're distracted by these street level battles that have no direct meaning. You're not asking the larger questions and you're not thinking about the future at all.
they can't maintain surveillance or logistics to keep the population compliant.
They locked the planet down for 2 weeks that turned into 2 years. You're focused on the wrong things. They control the money. Who gives a shit about surveillance? You've never been somewhere where the food "ran out" have you?
That all being said.. I'm a paranoid weirdo who wishes more people were as paranoid as I am.. none of that was meant to be personal. Living this way fills me with a lot of negative feelings that I otherwise don't know how to appropriately deal with.
I don't know if we can trust social media numbers alone to signify public opinions.
No need to guess.. you can't. We know they shadow ban people who speak inconvenient truths. They outright ban people who are popular and speak inconvenient truths.
It's a walled garden. It's controlled by corporate interests beholden to the CIA. It's PURE manipulation.
this could be widening the crack in the foundation of the establishment.
This is a limited hangout. They're letting you see this. So when the pendulum swings the other way, you'll think you did it, and you'll immediately forget how manipulated your environment is.
the authorities will be left with mass civil disobedience and effectively no power.
hahah.. yea.. this is why they want "smart border security." They create the crises they use against you. Every fucking time.
one guy just fucked off randomly
My understanding is this is the guy who took the picture and he went looking for Crooks. Which is why it hard to believe it to be basic retardation. They saw the kid. They made his bicycle. They knew he must be on the roof. Officers started pouring into AGR. They tried to get a view up on the roof and an officer injured himself in the process. All before he took a shot.
The kid did drone surveillance the day before. He shot at a range that the government uses. You give someone a little bit of tactical training and they can do some pretty impressive things. You can do this in a week or two. The rest of military training is all about unit endurance and special skills.
I could come up with a better plan...on my own.
Trump dead was not the endpoint. It was most likely meant to be an initiating event. The way in which it was done was likely just as important.
I mean.. you have to have Jack Ruby ready to go before you give Oswald the order, right?
Nothing. The problem is in the first line.
Disney, which owns seven studios
Until that's fixed you will have a movie company that produces whatever it wants without any real competition.
Bob Iger is about as qualified as a weatherman. He can tell you which way the wind is blowing. That's about it.
It's revictimizing them all over again. To even ask them puts them into the spotlight and puts the pressure of public reputation on them. There's no ethical way to do this without incidentally bullying the person into an unrealistic outcome.
And it does not fly over their heads. They're all narcissistic manipulators. They know what they are doing. They're injuring the interests of a child in order to spare their own feelings.
ROPE.
It's written entirely from the "mass market" perspective. So to the extent they're talking about FAANG and companies of similar scale I don't doubt their experience. To the extent it represents the actual job market or that it has anything to do with running your own business it's total fucking garbage.
More "the tiny corner of America I confine myself to isn't exactly to my liking" retardation.
This 2 do not contradict each other.
They suggest a priority.
If you are a Christian you would want others to help you not sin
Nor would I expect anyone to judge me should I have sinned.
This is just silly.
Then it should be simple to answer. What is your answer? What do you do when the sinner does not want your help? What do you do when his sin intrudes on your life? These are things that happen. "Helping to not sin" is a huge spectrum of problems.
He is saying that the lost sheep returns to Jesus, this would imply repentance not accepting sin.
He is also saying that being lost is expected and that for coming back to the fold all is forgiven and forgotten immediately.
Also there is nothing about violent retribution, I don't see that in the OP post either.
I expect that reasonable people can have a different view on this. You do understand that I meant this is part of a general trend though, correct?
If you saw your brother sinning you'd stop him, correct?
As long as I'm not ignoring the plank in my eye to concern myself with the speck in his.
So stop anyone from sinning because they are your sibling.
What if they don't want to be stopped? Should I use violence? Immediately? Or.. is there a threshold? Like.. three warnings and then a punch.. or how do we address this? This person may not see themselves as my sibling.
Critically.. should I judge him for sinning?
This idea that Jesus would accept sin because he was a hippie is laughable.
He also preached "Do unto others as you would have done to you."
He didn't tolerate sin he insisted you leave it behind to be with him.
When the shepherd leaves behind the 99 and finds his lost sheep, does he not bring him into his arms, and tell the sheep, "I love you the most?"
Anyways.. there's a real message of judgement and of violent retribution afoot lately. It concerns me because the uniparty security state would love nothing more than a violent outburst as an excuse to roll out the next version of smart borders with facial recognition and AI driven "homeland security."
The apparent need to ensure this message is posted everywhere in forms that are acceptable and expected in the forums they are posted in leads me to wonder if this is just part of the manipulation.
Anyways.. what Jesus wants is your soul. In heaven. With God. That is what is most important. If you want to show you love God, bring as many souls as you can with you, and lead them, in front of you, into Heaven.
This is true for the small subset of retards who post on twitter.
The other 95% are pretty reasonable and if you take them away from the source of influence for.. like.. literally 1 day.. they become instantly reasonable.
It's not that the media has a particular zeal for lying to you.. it's that it has to to capture this group..
On the upside.. it costs them Trillions every year.. it's not sustainable.
They were stolen from and then lied to about it. When they got uppity they were turned into terrorists.
The administration committed crimes against the public, and as gay as it is, probably against the entirety of humanity. They also abused an elderly dementia patient to do it all.
but I think his purchase of Twitter really threw a wrench in the deep state's ability to damage the elections.
People get this backwards all the time. The deep state wants money and influence. They don't care if the guy they work with wears a red tie or a blue tie. The major advantage is the longer they work with a blue tie the more the red tie people are willing to pay for their access.
They're not an agency with an agenda so much as they are an amorphous blob of collected power.
Think "mafia" and you'll start seeing it.
It's funny that people see this as a reason to like Musk. I see it as a reason to ignore both of them.
I'm not going to pretend that an angry 20 year old has anything worthwhile to say other than to express their angst at mostly still being a child.
I'm not going to pretend that a goofy 53 year old CEO is "on my side" because he's culturally aware of the same problems I am.
Propaganda for the retarded by the retarded. What a waste of space.