Interesting read on matriarchal structures
(nitter.poast.org)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Black “societies” do the same thing, it’s a cargo cult mentality.
This is why it's so important to have a Constitution that is an original source of our clearly delineated rights.
When we get too far away from it somebody looks back and says, hey wait a minute, it doesn't actually say anything about "hate speech".
This is where Canada screwed up. Not only is their Charter of so-called Rights and Freedoms recent, so it's not venerated by time, but it allows for any infringement of any right that is "justified", which is so vague and ill-defined that it provides no protection at all from this "copy of the copy" aka fad-chasing moral decay; it's justified to imprison you for not using the right pronouns because the current fad says that's justified. QED.
Just like European human rights.
I've noticed this problem my whole life. Women are always the ones to insufferably sick to rules, no matter if they're just making things worse, whereas men are the ones who understand why the rules exist and thus can change or break them as the need arises.
Especially if they make things worse for people they have a grudge against.
Karen memes are a thing for a reason.
Women will also break rules when it suit them, hence the shoplifting and whoring.
There's a rather significant difference between "I know why the guard rail is there, but I'm going to carefully go around it to get the job done." And "Screw rules! I'm doing what I want to do and you can't tell me not to, DAD!"
I like the copy of a copy of a copy idea of a matriachy.
Instance was rate limited, so here's the archive.
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/ADdPQ
One of the weirder academic pushes is the idea that since men will always be warriors, matriarchal societies will never exist. It's really stupid.
Even moreso that only one structure can exist at a given moment. Matriarchal structures have existed the entirety of western history. I’m not sure what they think child rearing is if not a matriarchal structure.
It takes forever to explain the harems are traditionally where all the women stay in the house. Grandma, aunt, sisters, and children.
That's a problem with any form of collectivism.
Natural matriarchies have a single female in control.
Like patriarchies she is a target within her clan amongst other females and the strongest one wins. They fight but the fighting tends to be distributed across several members and periods of time. They often start due to underhanded tactics by one competitor or the other.
In any case, the main function is not group order, but breeding order. The comparable ape societies are not collectivist in any way beyond this and breaks to the ordering are common due to internal power dynamics.
It's actually interesting. Unlike what happens when several modern women gather and try to establish social order but without any mating dynamic to drive behaivor or goals.