I've said it before, remembering any gay sex scene from the post-obama transformation in media is like losing The Game.
The only way to win is to get a handle on the places and situations you lose The Game in and totally avoiding them forever.
It's funny that the ad doesnt say anything about jews, just "israel: the HOLY land". It kind of shows where they are at in the struggle for hearts and minds. Basically if you're against sending money and weapons to jews for the purpose of genocide, you are "hostile" to "the holy land" lol. Like hey, think maybe there's a reason the ADL didnt think it'd be effective to invoke the word "jews" in this propaganda?
Having some uh, PR problems? Some kind of narrative-based complications in the ol "poor jews :( muh 6 mil, you're not a NAZI are you" script?
Fun fact, literal Ancient Romans called it Palestinia thousands of years ago now. British empire called it Palestine when they established colonial relations there. But totally coincidentally, juuuust before ww2, it was established as a jewish ethnostate named Israel in the Balfor Declaration of 1917.
Today the only other states designated as ethnostates are Japan (and you see what is being done there) and the maligned, internationally spurned state of North Korea, and they are only considered to be ethnostates by critics.
Around 1948, coincidentally riiiiight after ww2, Israel officially declared itself in legal text to be a jewish ethnostate, by word of law, with citizenship dictated by jewish ancestry, making jews the only group on the entire Earth to have such a state.
Today, Israel the holy land is known as the home of all jews, and far from having a home in a place less holy, every other race on the face of the planet lacks any legally designated home state whatsoever, and are each submerged in the same system of multicultural values together. The more homogeneous the state, the closer it is to being an ethnostate of goyim, the higher up it is on the list of the enemies of the United States of America, which some have begun to speculate has a... special relationship with israel.
(Originally this comment said "if you vote against sending money and weapons to jews for the purpose of genocide" but I had to remove the word "vote" since, for a vast majority of Americans, an option to cast a vote against sending money and weapons to israel is not actually available)
So, never watch Torchwood, gotcha. Thank you.
Maybe ill pick up a used one if they get cheap enough
"I hope Americans see what's happening here, but I won't describe what's happening, due to that being illegal to do."
Good news is, we do!
Interesting point
Been kind of a long, long time since I've seen a shared Poso or Kirk tweet that wasnt given in the context of mocking their gatekeeping and doglike support of a certain outside country. Bannon just seems to be tick-tocking like Hannity any time I see him pop up, which has been like, once in more than a year.
Is the Switch full of the kind of games that are designed to permadie without support from the developers?
died
removed
HAS
One of these things is not like the others
Weird how she manages to criticize the conditions of protest in a state that serves israel, without saying anything at all in support Palestine, despite being described as a pro-palestine protester and not an anti-israel protester, or God forbid, a person protesting genocide in general.
But I guess I am biased, since I would rather donate to her cause or even participate in a gay blue haired rally than vote for a politician that supports israel.
Wait, did I just express dissatisfaction related to israel and its lobby in the united states and perhaps even its influence over our laws, without supporting palestine? Oh snap that is weird, I feel all tingly, like I'm the subject of mass state propaganda all a sudden.
Perhaps part of the reason I don't grok it is that between my irl schedule and my talking directly with people like you on forums like this one, I get my full social fix.
Thank you for the perspective. I guess I am just coming at it from an alien angle. What you say about boomers and background tv makes sense. But even the stuff boomers half-watch seems superior so long as they are steering away from talk shows and 24/7 MSM news channels.
I get the motive on the creator's end, but I meant, what about the viewer? Is it just momentum? I feel like there are a lot of nobodies making their living this way, or trying to, and it suggests there is a bigass audience up for grabs that wants to one-way-deadstare a streamer in the eyes while he reads tweets and blogs. Often enough the streamer reads slowly and stutteringly like a kid in high school reading to the class. Every aspect of it is awful to me and the only part that makes sense is the streamer's motive to get money for contributing diddly to society.
Why do people watch stuff like that? I get AVGN type content creators where each video is a visual work that tells a story, and to a lesser extent I get RLM stuff where they are having a potentially unscripted discussion about a subject, but what is up with the videos where they just read the internet to you?
It's like there is a tier list that starts with the New-Age TV Replacement Materials tier, then Friend Simulators tier, and then.... "digital voice assistant who can't hear your commands" tier, which is competitive with, like, an accessibility option on ancient android phone meant to assist sight-impaired people.
To be fair (exactly unlike the ADL), I'll point out that they used the word "recognizes" and not "supports".
I might "recognize" that my son disagrees with my unilateral decision to punish him.
I might "recognize" any manner of problem that I intend to "rectify".
DEATH!
DEEEAAAAAAATH!
FORTH EORLINGAS!
Ha ha!
NelsonMuntzPointing.jpg
It is not hilarious seeing shills and poz. You seem to be functioning smugly and snugly within the expected parameters of true blue a cable tv news consumer. But hey congratulations on your heckin superior vantage point of the situation. Gosh I wish I could more confidently associate any form of dissent the state badjackets with terrorist groups, like you. I'm just so humbled and jealous of your inherently reliable perspective on this and all other primetime state mouthpiece narratives.
Next time you borrow snake person language and call them hamas demonstrators or pro-hamas please put it near the beginning of the post so people know that they really dont need to read the rest. It's not kind to waste people's time like that.
mass murdering innocent people is bad
AW HELL NO YOU DID NOT JUST SUPPORT HAMAS HOW DARE YOU lmao
Oh yeah and hmmmmmm, I wonder who funded hamas in the years leading up to this conflict...
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
"Consultants":
I noticed your game isn't gay and lame. It'd be a shame if you got some bad publicity.
"job" lmao
Hey sorry about this but I just lost The Game again looking back through my replies, and rules are rules.
pro hamas pro-terrorist
D&C psyop language from an elected republican? Say it aint so!
Belgum is a white EU country in fair standing with the powers that be, therefore I am instantaneously able to tell you what the bill is about:
White prostitutes from a white country have been refusing sex with migrant customers.
That is the only situation in which the law would have come into being in the west. The government isnt providing sex to incels or btfoing feminists for the sake of western society, it is an anti-discrimination multiculti enforcement law framed in a way that purposefully obfuscates the problem it is intended to solve.