"8 year olds, dude. 8 year olds."
"Look. I'm a 'minor attracted person.' So.. I guess.. I have to let my house burn down once in a while.. so I can keep voting for the people who will let me live a sick and disgusting life."
"The Lead with CIA Plant."
So.. this is what it looks like when two CIA directorates fight.
THEY SELL ADS!
You should see the shit you have to put up with in CA if you want install a diesel generator. It's a fucking nightmare. Then the "air resources board" entitles itself to show up at your property and give you the 3rd degree over your generator, inspect your hours, and possibly fine you if you've run too many hours for your certificate.
Yet.. install a battery pack.. no problem.. no registration.. no oversight.
FUCK the administrative state.
"can you imagine the smog?"
tards live in a valley and can't figure out why the air sucks.
lol.. fat bitch thinks scraping her arms makes her interesting.. scar tissue doesn't look like that retard.
Pictures arent crime.
So I can break into your house and take a naked picture of you and share it without your consent? I mean it's just a picture. What's your problem with it?
No one is being victimized.
Yea, exactly, you didn't even know the picture exists.
This kind of logic is how we end up censoring normal sex and violence in media
Was it hard getting on that high horse?
so it has to be called out.
If you draw naked pictures of children and share them online you are going to jail. And you think this is the moment to "call out" a problem?
This is leftist bullshit. Show me the actual harms here instead a bunch of handwavy excuses to avoid punishments.
When has the legislation "escalated?" It's pretty simple, you can't touch kids inappropriate, can't take naked pictures of them, and you can't draw and then SHARE naked pictures of them.
There's no slippery slope here. More civil damage was done after 9/11 than any of these cases. You're clutching at straws.
Once we’ve agreed on that, what then? What is a young adult supposed to actually do tomorrow? What is your plan? Complaining about it incessantly on Twitter is not a plan.
Matt, what you are doing is NOT A PLAN either, you fucking online twat.
I say that he must get up in spite of it all, get the best job he possibly can, and work as hard he can to achieve what he can.
Okay. Then. HELP HIM. And this shit, right here, this ain't help.
Fucking hollywood faggotry. If you have a problem with the world then participate in the solution with your MOUTH CLOSED.
I hate these types of people. Well groomed and retarded.
of criminalizing cartoons or AI generated images perplexing.
Criminals escalate. If you don't stop the small crimes they graduate to larger ones.
I'm not seeing the societal benefit to criminalizing this.
It's the same reason we're pretty harsh about abusing animals. That behavior only leads one direction. It's not worth caring about people who do this and then will stop on their own. The punishment works EITHER WAY.
and they can't be fixed
Yea but they can be so afraid of being put in prison that they keep in their pants all the way into the grave.
It's an out from perceived oppression. Since it's a lie it slides into narcissism quickly. Dude will be touching kids in less than 3 years.
he's got the self hating 1980s buttigeig gay
the most sexless man on the planet? seems on brand to me.
Having a personable "conversation" with a chat bot. Which is gay enough, but then, to take the time to screen shot and share it, as if you've somehow discovered something valuable.. gayer than AIDS.
Ian's got "limited hangout" energy. I'm generally suspicious of this type of content. In terms of "woke right" being "CIA mockingbirds" I honestly think James is accidentally on target. He just doesn't know exactly why and ironically can't explain it precisely. Too much time trying to decode Hegel and he's gone nuts.
playing into the 5D chess
5D chess does not exist. Even if it were, no one who has enough money to play it, gives a wet shit about you.
but it’s also important to make statements like this if you’re trying to make it clear that you’re not just blindly pardoning a bunch of violent rioters because they’re on your side.
No it's not. That means you accept their false position. That the pardons will be ideological and are meant to release a riot squad. Who even believes that bullshit? Then when you explain it away you allow it to become part of the conversation.
Vance is a retarded political operative. This was an intentional failure and a missed opportunity to take control of the typical hand wringing elitist Washington D.C. narrative sphere. Dude is a weakling.
WTF is this nonsense.
Oh. The CIA. They're not going to let populism get in the way of their agenda.
The proud boys trial.
They grabbed a police shield that had dropped.
"Violence."
Intelligence is just rebranding of "dual allegiance."
It works great in a war and for counter insurgency.
If you want peace it has to stop existing.
Otherwise you end up with a fruit company overthrowing governments because it can't stand losing a banana field. And fuck everyone if they lose anyways. You'll get a President assassinated that way.
The US government killed the most people in the world in nukes, and this was before Israel was a thing.
I really don't get what any of that has to do with what Ian said.
jew mindset. two wrongs make a right to them.
Hilariously this is just phase one.
He still has a whole appeals process on the actual outcome anyways.
The judge is trying to save face by admitting this will do nothing but waste taxpayer time and money.
If you're getting outraged about commercial products. Whew.
Who cares anyways.. shit is funny..
No he wasn't. He's kiting on the fact there are only two political parties and billions get spent on creating this false dichotomy.
Wake up. There is no "wizard" behind the curtain. It's just people with money lying to get more of your money. They wore a blue tie this decade. They'll wear a red one next. It's absurdly simple.