Nitter link.

And some of those "rebuttals" are incredibly dense. He responds well though.

"A program that they stole from the United States"

lol

The US government stole billions from Americans to make nukes.

The US government killed the most people in the world in nukes, and this was before Israel was a thing.

I really don't get what any of that has to do with what Ian said.

The approved narrative is quickly becoming that Israel is behind everything evil in the world and specifically in the US and while there is much evil that Israel is responsible for, they are not the entirety of this iceberg.

We are being shown the tip- why?

Firstly...approved narrative? Really?! It's becoming more popular, sure, but still gets you a ton of flack if you say it. Certainly not "approved."

Secondly, again, what does that have to do with anything? "Yes, Israel is evil, but if you call them evil you're focusing on them, and you need to look at other things." I mean, sure, don't just stop there and act like Israel does all the evil...but it's a weird rebuttal as it doesn't address...anything. To be fair, I think this one is a crazy person obsessed with "revolution" in general.

None of that makes Hamas good, which I think was Elon's overall point. Hamas is bad and they are teaching kids to hate. The fact that Isreal is bad too is worth mentioning, but doesn't make Hamas good.

I like all these "Israel is bad is worth mentioning...but stop mentioning" tactics. Ian wasn't saying Hamas was good. A bunch of people talking past each other. Otherwise known as...the internet.

And then some other dude just posts a report from the "Pizzagate" shooting. I guess the implication is Ian is a "conspiracy theorist" and mentally unhinged.

The only rebuttals that halfway addressed the points admitted they were largely correct. Ugh.