I think what we're realizing is that no one is coming to save us. Not the church, not the government, not the tradcucks, and certainly not the feminists. We're on our own, and it's up to us to build the kind of lives that will shield us from clown world. Men's spaces can be helpful to that, but they're pretty secondary. They're also worthless if they let women dictate what can and can't be said in them. Look at r/menslib and its retarded little brother r/bropill for example. Therapy is just about manipulating men into being good little beta slaves for women, so that's worthless as a way for men to improve their lives. The only real solution is to build yourself up to the point where it's feasible to check out of clown world and then do so.
There's a ton legal liabilities that come with cohabitation, even without kids. They just vary by state a lot more than the ones that come with marriage and kids. The biggest problem is that she can claim common law marriage to drag you into divorce court. If your plan relies on a divorce court judge ruling against a woman you need a different plan.
The best kind of regulation is, of course, self-regulation, but in my opinion the only way that you will even get close to this for the majority of people is some kind of guilt or shame culture.
It also requires a racially homogeneous society. Dieversity and societal trust have a correlation that's close to -1.
These gen-X women are going to have to up their game on the competition front if they want to get taken seriously by men with disposable income and free time.
Their only hope is to be a fun companion who doesn't try to get their claws in his assets and chain him to Chad's kids. Certain men with disposable income and free time might be down for a deal like that, but even then they would probably have younger options. Demanding full price for a beat up car that Chad took a joyride in and discarded? No bueno.
It's not for me, but I think it's respectable if you're not responsible for the kid's mother as well. One of the major the problems with getting involved with a single mother is that she's the head of the family, not you. That leaves you with all of the responsibility and none of the authority. Adopting an orphan pairs the responsibility with authority and avoids the issue. I'd never call a man in this situation a cuck if the kid's mother was out of the picture.
I actually suspect that she's understating the magnitude of the problem. My guess is the kids will never use a toilet without assistance let alone become functional adults. Women will overstate the extent of their kids' special needs when they're trying to win the "who has it harder" status contest, but they lie in the opposite direction when they're trying to lock down a paypig.
I'm over a decade younger than you are and I'm in a similar boat, only I wouldn't even entertain a relationshit for a family. The divorce laws give women way too much power over men for that to be a viable option for me.
You wanna know what's really fucked up? This bitch somehow managed to find a boyfriend. I don't know if it's a real LTR or if it's more of a fuckbuddy situation, but either way he's been divorce raped once and knows better than sticking his dick in that feminist electrical outlet again. This bitch is so delusional and entitled that she has cat lady board posters dropping red pills. This one is my favorite:
Your post has the “A REAL man would step up and help me take care of these kids!” vibe to it and we are old enough to not take that bait.
Remember, there's nothing manly or alpha about allowing yourself to be shamed into doing something that's not in your best interest. Even younger guys are waking up to this because of men's content online and how transparently awful women are these days.
Companies are starting to realize that DEI is radioactive, both the term itself and and the policies it describes. That's a real if small victory. Of course that doesn't mean that they'll stop doing it, but they will stop calling it DEI and make efforts to hide the DIE shit they're doing instead of broadcasting it to everyone. Some of it is lying leftists sneaking around and hiding what they're doing of course, but the rot is so deep that even an owner/CEO committed to rooting it out would have a tough time. Twitter a is a prime example. If anyone has an incentive to root out the troons and danger hairs it's Elon Musk, but his results have been haphazard at best.
and if they want to pay that much for it
I suspect that's a major part of the problem. Kumswala's war chest is effectively infinite with money coming in from all kinds of shady sources, so she just flood the airways. Trump has real constraints that he has to contend with.
When I see a hot woman, I’m attracted to them, but also want to be them at the same time. Most of my fantasies are about becoming / being a complete woman, although after I climax, I literally feel like I want to just be a guy again and live my life.
Something that's only appealing when you're horny is by definition a fetish. This guy is textbook case of an AGP "transbian", and if he had more self more self awareness than a rock he wouldn't be so eager to prove our point about trannies.
In a somewhat similar vein, Manor Lords is the first game that an advertisement has gotten me excited for in a long time.
You know the answer, I know the answer, and everyone here knows the answer. Replacing Joe with Kumswala is all about giving them plausible deniability when they steal the election. That's why they're mounting the biggest propaganda campaign in history to prop this whore up.
Modern women are just women that are allowed unleash their shitty nature on the world because it wasn't constrained by external forces imposing inconvenient things like honor and accountability.