Less to do with the gullibility of Redditors and more because she's profoundly retarded. She's aware that she can somehow use rumor mongering and HR as weapons against men who have spurned her, but she has no clue how, so in the attempt, she's practically admitting to it outright. Redditors still love a good outrage, but OP already framed herself as the lunatic, so it got turned around on her.
If you rearrange the letters in NOW, it spells NWO. Coincidence??? I'm on to you, Lilith.
I didn't downvote him but I don't agree, and I'm certainly not gonna bother arguing with him either. I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up the subject of a True Crime documentary one day, and frankly, the only thing I think could possibly help him is to join a monastery.
There are women who fake their fear, yes. Women's tears are weapons and many of them know it. On the other hand, I think women are naturally a bit androphobic, probably for good and deeply genetically-embedded reasons, but still not very rational in our culture. They don't experience it as an acute fear, like you'd see in pop culture, but more as an anxiety. It's not bad enough to make them actually fearful of men, though it can make them completely neurotic if left unmanaged.
Like any anxious phobia, they can easily fall into patterns where they reinforce their phobia, like an agoraphobe who closes their blinds in the day or an arachnophobe reading about Recluses. For androphobes, that's True Crime. It's not the only one, of course. That little bit of anxiety crack is sprinkled into most pop culture now. True Crime is just ones of the most pure forms of it that doesn't cause (extreme) outrage.
I've always loved how bafflingly retarded X-Men is. They've been on this "civil rights" allegory for as long as the franchise has existed, and the entire time, Mutants have been dangerously unstable human weapons. Either they're completely fucking mental, their powers are strategic weapon-scale dangerous, or both. It doesn't matter how it's framed or what the characters say, on an even surface-level analysis, the only sane conclusion you can draw from X-Men is that around muties, never relax.
Don't Starve is also a game almost a decade past its prime - and it wasn't particularly good in its prime, either. It was never great at crafting, survival, exploration, or combat. The only thing it had going for it was its art style, and frankly, it's hard to look at. It was a game for hipsters, and now its a game for worthless tranny hipsters.
I'm starting to think you need the occasional batshit woman for a healthy social ecosystem. Nothing reveals your weak links faster than a psycho bitch slinging poon to simps.
Doesn't work that way. Leftists made a whole big deal out of Rules for Radicals, especially that quote, but it's just leftist's internal propaganda. You can't make your enemy live up to their own rulebook without power. Only power can make and enforce the rules. That bit of "wisdom" is allowed to persist in pop culture because it allows ground-level leftist pawns to feel like they're revolutionaries, and not just pawns for already-existing power.
Larson or no, there's absolutely no way they can make a good Gears movie in 2023. Even in 2006, it would have been difficult. Gears came out at just the right time, and lasted long enough, that you can watch the West lose the last embers of primal masculinity as the series progressed. What started as an indulgence in unbound violence and fraternity turned into just another personal drama for women.
If you wanted to make Gears in its original spirit, you have to start with the rule that no woman will so much as raise her voice at a man, let alone hold a weapon. In the primal spirit Gears originally drew on, violence is solely in the world of men. Since that's never going to happen, it's doomed before you've put the first word of the script to paper.
TERFs are still RFs. Rowling's not actually that radical, but she still believes in the mystical uterus, even if she doesn't know to put it in those words. The only reason 21st century leftists hate her is because she won't pretend that men can obtain divine femininity by crossdressing.
Commenters were right to realize it was bait. Not a horrible way to slip this bit of slang into the lexicon, but unfortunately not quite high enough effort. Nonetheless, I will do my part and refer to trannies as necromorphs for the cause.
Last time anyone heard from the old Gamergate time machine, it was in orbit of Neptune and the crew was speaking in tongues. Wherever it went, it left the door open, and I'm pretty sure drag queens are what crawled out.
If somebody shoots up a mall today, I'm just gonna assume this schizopost was actually a sleeper agent activation code.
I think the thing I hate the most in this world is when leftists lie about their beliefs and goals when called out. They have absolutely no conscience whatsoever. The ease with which they say "It's not happening, and it's a good thing" makes me instantly mentally tag them as a cockroach, with all the same disgust and hate I'd feel from seeing one scurry under the fridge.
You'd think if somebody was going to mutilate themselves to this degree, they would be slightly more autistic about the details of their persona. Yeah sure, a "non-binary" dragon named after Tiamat and Medusa...only one of which might be a dragon, and both of which are explicitly female.
I know I'm pissing into the wind expecting any kind of sense out of that thing, but come the fuck on. What an awful, pitiful creature. Euthanasia would be a mercy.
It's still fringe, but there are attempts to push the term "futanari" out of use in place of "intersex" and "transgender." Seems pretty clear now that it's just another attempt for these sex pests to make it socially unacceptable to reject them.
For a while, I thought their reaction to the word "trap" was just them wanting their own "nigger" to chimp out over. I still think that's part of the motivation, but the complaints they had about it suggesting that trannies want to "trap people" turns out to be a real complaint. After all, they really do want to trap you.
Man do I feel that exercise struggle. It's just another one of the small difficulties you gotta endure to avoid the big ones. Meanwhile, I've got gym rat friends who say they get a workout high, and I'm half-convinced they're just spiking their water bottles.
I knew for a fact I'd never get it, ever, when they had de Blasio try to bribe his people with burgers, stuffing his greasy face with fast food and fucking moaning about vaccines.
The Outer Space Treaty restricts nuclear weapons and WMDs specifically. Nobody's bothered to figure out if reactors count as weapons or not (I'm betting on not), even though a sufficiently damaged reactor in orbit is basically a slow-motion dirty bomb, because nobody builds reactors for use in space. There's been maybe one or two very tiny reactors, and a bunch of RTGs (generators powered by heat from decay, rather than artificial fission reactions), none of which come anywhere near the scale they're proposing here. No need to legally get ahead of technology that doesn't yet, and may not ever exist.
A dumping ground for shelved MMO loading screen art.
If you wanna have either a laugh or a gag, follow the links through to the original NYT article. I have to wonder just how somebody made through enough of it to find the exorcism tale. It's just paragraph after paragraph of the most desperate fellating of Pelosi I think I've ever seen, and it's not even the first time the author has done it.
It's an anime about a porn-addicted dude turning into a middle school girl, so it was inevitable.
I'm not listening to 30 minutes of this faggot spin increasingly convoluted explanations for why his kind isn't evil.
At this rate, everything except hairy fagclowns twerking in schools is going to be grooming.
I'm on-board with the "they've always been there" position. I do think they have their uses though. We don't actually know how good China's spy satellites are, so that alone could justify sending out a balloon to observe a few key locations. Besides, balloons are so much cheaper, and how we go about shooting one down could be the info they're meant to gather in the first place. That could mean observing our weapons and reaction times, or by agents within the military observing how that information is collected and acted upon. Hell, in 2023, both sides are probably collecting information on how we react to it.