Man, imagine if that low of level of corruption got the same response in the United States! Was she on an anti-establishment naughty list and that's why she was punished?
The only difference is that society is very gynocentric so woman are universally praised for exhibiting interpersonal victimhood while men are outright mocked and shamed if they do so.
Straight, White men are shamed for doing so.
Black man has interpersonal victimhood? Das right!
Jewish man has interpersonal victimhood? Of course! Look at history. Jewish people are ALWAYS victimized.
Gay man has interpersonal victimhood? Makes sense, look at what "the community" has been through.
Not disagreeing that women don't get MORE of a pass than the men of their respective groups but society does extend this sympathy to SOME men.
this allows the US to crush the cartels, too
The US works in direct opposition to the CIA now?
How is it that a large group of them can come here not speaking the language and build a life, family, and community but their descendants can't take a large group to their homeland where they don't speak the language and build a life, family, and community?
Anything forced outside it's natural context is open to being used for evil.
Women are not equipped to be leaders. So, using them to lead will ensure you will get compliance for your twisted agenda.
It's not the women that's the problem, it's the upset of natural order. Women are just the tool being used at this moment.
Male disposability is a unfortunately reality of the human race. It used to come with respect and honor for those who can continued to contribute and protect society despite how quickly that society would cast them aside.
Now, men are disposable and scorned.
Jesus says love your enemies.
Group A loves Hitler, Group B does not love Hitler.
Group A considers Hitler an enemy. Group B does not consider Hitler an enemy.
Therefore: Group A are necessarily not Nazis. Group B are necessarily are Nazis.
Checkmate, Democrats!
Must be left-leaning, because I don't get it.
A better sentiment is "no idols". Follow a strong man leading a good life and if he turns out to be weak or a fraud, dispose of him and move on.
Everything Milo touches turns to shit. Obvious jokes aside, why doesn't he join up with the Democratic Party and ruin things over there, then?
Trump said he'd put Hillary in jail. The second he wins, he shrugs his shoulders and says 'ahhh, forget about it, it's history!'
This really deserves to be retrieved from the memoryhole. It might not be as widespread now, but it was an open secret that the Clinton's are some of the most corrupt politicians on the face of the earth. Scandal after scandal and that's only what came to light.
It should have been obvious at that moment that Trump wasn't going to do anything of merit. If you're willing to allow that big of a target, that you have a public mandate to pursue, get away then you aren't ever going after hard targets. Just softballs to keep your base happy.
That sounds like a call to action. Biden banned from Twitter when?
This is such a braindead take. Every single one of the the politicians that drafted and passed Hart-Celler AND the founders of the Federal Reserve all had one thing in common.
All of their mothers are women.
Every. Single. One.
You are going to look at that blatantly obvious pattern and tell me I'm crazy for blaming women?
That's because the groups that don't want to be infiltrated aren't accessable to the outside world.
And if they try to reduce the influence, the entire world will wage war on them.
So, if I simulate a happy family on my computer by playing Sims, is that a breakthrough in my relationships? Am I finally no longer a loser but a respectable member of society? Will my mom start talking to me again?
I wholeheartedly endorse this. As soon as you manage to get all the guns out of the hands of the "youth" of the inner cities, I will gladly relinquish mine...
Extrapolating from the JQ, you should be able to tell that WQ is the Wombat Question....
If you are in a relationship with a woman, she wants to hear that she's not like other women. If all the men tell all the women they are unique, then I guess it's a stereotype?
Imagine if she quit her job, stayed home, and did sexual favors for one man who pays her bills rather than a thousand.
Would this article still be celebrating her? Would it still imply that other women should follow her lead? Is staying at home and using your sexuality to pay the bills only empowerment on their terms?
He is technically right. Social media doesn't turn a profit. It's value is not in it's stated product. The value of Twitter is not in being the largest platform on the internet. It's value is in CONTROLLING the largest platform for the message.
It's not socially acceptable for dads to control their families. So even people who know better tend to be too weak to actually act on it.
You also had hospitals lying to their own staff.
They still do. I visited someone in the hospital that, when tested during the admission process, tested positive. Otherwise, they were asymptomatic.
A sign was placed on the door so that housekeeping and room service wouldn't check on them. Any staff that did enter needed an extra PPE before entering.
When I mentioned that we've known for two years that there is no asymptomatic spread, the nurse informed me that it was "just hospital policy".
So, hospital policy is set by non-medical professionals using un-scientific methods? Then, they wonder why people resist/ignore doctors orders?
You have killed thousands of Syrian children without blinking.
You got it all wrong. He doesn't find it sick because he thinks they are being used to murder innocents, he finds it sick because he knows it's the one thing standing in the way of an open one-party state that rules every aspect of the citizens' lives.
He's sick of having to pretend like we still live in a democracy, kind of like a lot of us here are just for different reasons.
Bbbbut, the name George Soros is in the most detached from reality tier on the Conspiracy Theory Iceberg!