2
SaltyJollyRoger 2 points ago +2 / -0

You said the south did themselves a disservice by firing first. Is that not to say they acted shamefully? Perhaps I misread your intent, but you seem to think they were in the wrong for doing it.

In my opinion calling it a "trap" is stretching the lexicon to a breaking point. It's hardly a trap to point a loaded gun at someone to goad them into self defense.

3
SaltyJollyRoger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then how is it shameful that they fired first? Should they have waited for the subjugation to commence? Do US citizens need to be shot before they can exercise the second amendment?

2
SaltyJollyRoger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then would you agree that a well supplied military regiment with warships occupying a fort within a border with port access after they agreed to leave is an act of aggression?

2
SaltyJollyRoger 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's ludicrous and you know it. Any leader would consider a heavily armed and supplied force at their doorstep an act of aggression because there's no real expectation that they're just going to sit there. You don't ship weapons and supplies to soldiers so they can just sit there.

You're being intentionally obtuse because you want the north to be in the right.

4
SaltyJollyRoger 4 points ago +4 / -0

The south could've left it alone? That's insane. It's just as insane as expecting Russia not to react to an expansion of NATO. The south had seceded, so the union had no right to maintain military presence.

You're intentionally dodging the question of what Lincoln was going to do with those reinforced, resupplied troops.

4
SaltyJollyRoger 4 points ago +4 / -0

And if they hadn't fired first, would the union troops have packed up their supplies and munitions and shipped out on their warships? Because that's the only situation in which it would have been a trap. It was an act of war.

5
SaltyJollyRoger 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lincoln said he was going to withdraw troops from Fort Sumpter. Instead he sent reinforcements and supplies. The south fired first because they weren't idiots.

3
SaltyJollyRoger 3 points ago +3 / -0

TIL that usury is part of the jewish religion and not a racial mode of economic thinking

8
SaltyJollyRoger 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is most evident in their treatment of Fauci. In the late eighties and early nineties he was reviled by the left because of the highly toxic AIDS medicines that were killing people faster than the AIDS was. Now they love him.

2
SaltyJollyRoger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm still amazed Wokies of the Coast is still in business. They've systematically ruined every one of their IPs.

9
SaltyJollyRoger 9 points ago +9 / -0

The hilarious part is that Chinese communism came from the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks are jews.

7
SaltyJollyRoger 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's what I keep thinking? It's an absolute joke, and the investors seem to be the punch line.

3
SaltyJollyRoger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another good example of too complacent and incurious: the 1986 vaccine injury act. Cue the skyrocket of autism and autoimmune disorders.

3
SaltyJollyRoger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or was it the crushing weight of the church pews?

2
SaltyJollyRoger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wanted to argue, but you've got a good point. I need to stop thinking these eco-marxists are retarded because it's a legitimate tactic for strangling growth.

5
SaltyJollyRoger 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's been a growing problem since Pasteur's overlooked plagiarisms

1
SaltyJollyRoger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically there's nothing to prove excessive salt consumption is bad for you, but there's lots of studies that correlate it because the stuff that's bad has a ton of salt in it to disguise it's true nature.

The bottom line is that fluorosis is correlated with the lower IQs.

22
SaltyJollyRoger 22 points ago +22 / -0

people running businesses isn't "detrimental to Black [sic] people"

Look up abortion clinic neighborhood statistics and then come back. Sure, people running businesses isn't detrimental in the surface, but some businesses are detrimental and they have people running them.

Woke right

If questioning jewish people and their actions was woke, then nobody in the media would've glommed onto it the way they did. It's a stupid phrase patently designed to be absurd.

41
SaltyJollyRoger 41 points ago +41 / -0

Because there just aren't that many groups behind the conspiring once it's laid out

36
SaltyJollyRoger 36 points ago +36 / -0

I bet their librarian keeps copies of homo grooming books in reserve to quietly hand out to students

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›