Yes, I do have a personal agenda. It’s to keep kids away from groomers.
We want children to be taught that all families are equally valid. A mom and a dad, only a mom or a dad, two dads, two moms, a granny or auntie or uncle, or anything else as long as the child has a loving and caring home
Fun fact. Not every family is equally valid, no matter how much you might want it to be.
I can respect that a single mom is doing the best she can, and she might end up raising a great kid, but patterns don’t lie. Single parent homes result in disproportionately high numbers of dysfunctional kids. Higher rates of crime, lower educational achievement, lower rates of relationship and financial success later in life, etc.
A new generation of “queer” homes is going to bring a whole new set of dysfunctions to the table. And trying to normalize that dysfunction does a disservice to the kids that have to live through it.
Not all lifestyle choices are equally valid. Claiming they are is dishonest, and ultimately harmful to the people that buy into the lie.
Leftists don’t think minorities can be wrong. Ever. About anything. Even when they’re burning everything down. It’s always just racism to them. Or internalized racism if it’s a minority disagreeing with them.
Ignore the “allahu akbar” behind the flaming curtain.
Racial grievance and victimhood are their only perceived virtues. Because they’re brainlets.
I don’t even care what victim bullshit they want to try to conjure up to justify riots anymore. In this case, I just conjure up an alternate race grievance, say “Barbary slave trade,” then tell them to fuck off.
I’m done justifying the continuation of my culture to people that hate everything about it. If they don’t like it, they can fuck off to a country with a culture they do like. I guarantee that utopian fantasy country won’t put with their leftist bullshit either though.
Western countries need to stop putting up with it too.
Caller: There's a bunch of old naked degens spreading their cheeks for kids!? Send an officier ASAP!
911: Did you cup their balls and show the kids how to suck dick?
Caller: ...no.
911: We're sending an officer now. You're in big trouble, homophobe. Dick sucking 101 in the clink will teach you how to love all that kid friendly gay shit. It's the Canadian way.
Why bother with a surveillance state when you can just lock people out of society altogether?
The woke version of excommunication is well on its way, I see. All rejoice... or be locked out any and all financial transactions. Now, and forever more. Amen.
And by "amen," I mean BLM, of course.
If by "our fault" you mean the fault of gamers and social media, then no. Macron's as big a faggot as he's ever been.
However, if by "our fault" you mean we allowed a fifth column to form in our nations by way of of lax immigration policy, then yes, it is our fault. It's a fault that needs correction.
So fatsoes are a breed of human now? Fully distinct from the thin, athletic breed?
Can we stop breeding them then? I'm tired of looking at the fatsoes.
Rotten Tomatoes is both fake and gay. Trust their honest representation of scores at your peril.
The Lord of the Rangz, by Mel Gibson.
Frodo: What do you think of my travel garb, Gandalf?
Gandalf: You look like a bitch in heat, Frodo. And if you get raped by a pack of orcs, it'll be your fault.
Frodo: Gandalf, no...
When you import a demographic whose worldview dictates that you submit to their version of God, and no other, and their explicitly layed out plan for that submission is jihad, what other outcome could there be? Allowing the open wound to fester won't allow it to heal over time. It'll just keep getting worse and more septic until amputation is the only solution. Or death.
Mass arrests and deportations now is the less violent solution. Things will only get messier the longer they do nothing.
Multiculturalism is a failed project. It was always going to fail. Without a strong, vital overculture to unite the disparate, fractious groups together, it doesn't work. And a weak western overculture that pathologically puts their own interests last and minoritarian interests first just doesn't cut it.
Unless a fractured culture is the plan, and a rising jihadi tide is intended as a justification to completely obliterate any and all remaining personal freedoms in the name of safety and stability. Security needs to be removed before it can be used as an excuse for totalitarianism, I guess.
Either way, we should have never gone down this path in the first place. It was never going to lead anywhere good.
The attitude that it's satisfying work is a good one, I think. Makes it easier to keep moral up during the long fight.
Eternal vigilance, at every level. Legal, political and cultural.
This is how they'll get around affirmative action being deemed illegal.
Underachieving dimwits like this will be given unearned accolade upon accolade leading up to their university application. All of these absurd achievements will be used to justify their admission over better qualified white and asian candidates. They may have had better SAT scores, but look at all these other achievements!? Stunning and brave.
They'll muddy the waters of merit so thoroughly that future lawsuits will be much harder to litigate. If every cog in the educational machine maintains the lie that folly is wisdom and wisdom is folly, proving that it was a lie all along becomes that much more difficult.
The entire educational system needs to be gutted to remove the rot if things are to truly improve.
I tell the people I work with that I'm far right, and I do so proudly. I tell them that conservatism has become progressivism going the speed limit. They usually balk and throw out a bunch of "I bet you believe..." hypotheticals to which I laugh and agree.
The things they think are terrible and offensive are the things I truly believe. Because they're neither terrible, nor offensive to normal people with the ability to reason. Once they realize I'm not joking, they kind of look at me sideways for a while, then things go back to normal.
When people realize they can't shame you for your beliefs, they usually stop trying.
They wouldn't be able to stoke the fires of pathological altruism to continue importing migrant hordes if they properly discerned the obvious patterns. And those same migrant armies wouldn't be able to stoke actual fires wherever go. Mostly peaceful fires though, surely.
The media not noticing patterns isn't an oversight. It's by design. Most mainstream media is the enemy of the people.
Maybe if far left immigration policy hadn't invited the third world to move in en masse, there wouldn't be a need for far right parties to rise in response. And calling them far right is an enormous reach. They're slightly right leaning in their sensible response to an existential crisis, at best.
Maybe if the left wing culture, media and entertainment had enforced no expectation to assimilate and take on the local culture, and hadn't sided with the newly arrived migrant army whenever conflicts arose between cultures, the migrants wouldn't have developed such a contradictory sense of entitlement and persecution leading to them hating the native cultures and peoples while simultaneously being given more than they deserve by those same people. Maybe Paris wouldn't be burning.
Maybe the BBC should fuck off and stop lying about reality. Maybe they should be defunded by the people of Britain.
The windrush generation is stunning and brave, vital to the rebuilding of Britain after the war, and integral to the British identity, right? According to the mainstream narrative that’s the case, but I have my doubts. Those doubts point to the narrative being complete bullshit.
The fact that institutions like Cambridge are trying to delegitimize the Anglo-Saxon ethnic identity as coherent while the rest of the narrative shills uphold the ethnic importance of the windrush generation as vital to the British identity is sickening.
Hengist and Horsa would be shamed by our weakness.
I don't care about Carson Wentz. At all. I don't even know who he is beyond what the article explains.
Regardless, hunting isn't a moral failure. Trying to use it as a justification to paint someone as immoral is a failure, however. The author of that tweat and the author of that article are both giant failures.
There are good and bad ways to hunt, and arguments to be made as to when you should or shouldn't do so, but there's no moral axiom that hunting is bad in and of itself, and that doing so makes you bad by extension. If there was, humanity would have never made it past the hunter gather stage.
This actually perfectly exemplified my experience with leftists. It's almost without fault in its representation, in fact.
They never answer a direct question with a direct response. It's always some kind of joke, misdirection or feigned misunderstanding. You can ask the same direct question a myriad of different ways, but you'll never get a direct answer because a direct answer would show just how vacuous their beliefs truly are.
Leftist ideology requires a veritable tower of babel of newspeak to justify their ever shifting belief system. Because the content of their beliefs aren't what they're arguing for. They're arguing for their control over you. Because they think they're better than you, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
Violent criminals that have sex with cats.
And children.
That explanation sounds wrong. I think a better translation would be "durka durka mohammed jihad." Trust me, I'm an expert.
Maybe if we throw all the gays at them, they'll deal with them swiftly, we'll run out of gays, and... then there won't be any more gays. Seems like a win win to me.
It all sounds like turka durka to me.
Maybe they're trying to kick off a faggot holobunga.
They're losing sympathy in the west due to them kicking the degeneracy dial up to pedophile, so they need a new victim narrative to gin up some fresh sympathy. Kicking the russian bear or the islamic world might get them what they want.
Them being a death cult would explain why they have no problem sacrificing their own to the all devouring god of self-victimhood.
No remains will ever be found. The only thing they'll find are anomalies seen in ground penetrating radar surveys. Those are remains though. Trust and believe. Kill yourself in shame, if you must.
They'll also find graveyards that were already known about, which by definition will have remains in them. As do all graveyards.
This graveyard had wooden grave markers that fell down or rotted over time!? That must mean genocide! Get the anti-Christian pitchforks out boys!
This church served a native community? Doesn't matter! Burn it down anyway.
Because, like all narrative shills, she's a liar. Most things she says aren't honestly held opinions but carefully curated lies. They may not all be scripted lies, but she knows well the range of opinions she's allowed to hold, and clings to those desperately, regardless of any true information that may pass her desk.
When caught in a lie? Double down. When that doesn't work? The information has changed. The science has changed. Trust the lying authority. Trust the finely crafted, predetermined science.
Lies are truth, and truth are lies, comrade.
A groomer is an adult that wants to indoctrinate young kids into thinking degenerate lifestyles are normal. Usually so they can draw them into that deviant lifestyle and take advantage of their innocence, all while making excuses claiming that’s not actually what they’re doing.
You know, kinda like what it seems you’re doing now.