The windrush generation is stunning and brave, vital to the rebuilding of Britain after the war, and integral to the British identity, right? According to the mainstream narrative that’s the case, but I have my doubts. Those doubts point to the narrative being complete bullshit.
The fact that institutions like Cambridge are trying to delegitimize the Anglo-Saxon ethnic identity as coherent while the rest of the narrative shills uphold the ethnic importance of the windrush generation as vital to the British identity is sickening.
Hengist and Horsa would be shamed by our weakness.
The windrush generation is stunning and brave, vital to the rebuilding of Britain after the war, and integral to the British identity, right? According to the mainstream narrative that’s the case, but I have my doubts. Those doubts point to the narrative being complete bullshit.
The fact that institutions like Cambridge are trying to delegitimize the Anglo-Saxon ethnic identity as coherent while the rest of the narrative shills uphold the ethnic importance of the windrush generation as vital to the British identity is sickening.
Hengist and Horsa would be shamed by our weakness.