Yeah, it basically comes down to whether you think being as extreme as Islam is the only way to stop feminism or whether you think there were other bad actors and issues that could be solved without going there. I tend to lean towards option two, but I do see the logic behind option one.
What are “actual gay rights”?
I don’t agree with Islam, but the steelman is clearly: look at all the simps we have today. Look at all the thots and bitches that get influence they should never be allowed anywhere near. Heck, this forum is ultimately the result of a woman using sex to get tons and tons of influence she didn’t deserve, and she wasn’t even particularly attractive. It’s nice that you have good self control, but it’s clear that much of society does not, and a handful of individuals’ resistance to manipulation means little when so many people around them are vulnerable.
In general I do think you’re right and there’s probably a much more scaled back version of a patriarchal society where you don’t force women into hijabs and prevent them from speaking entirely while still disallowing thottery and expecting men to have the bulk of societal leadership. But it is worth pointing out that at one point, we did have that, and it obviously didn’t end well.
Sort of, but the problem is that sentinels don’t necessarily stop mutants from being born, and they also don’t really do shit except make the most powerful ones mad (unless we’re playing “alternate future where sentinels killed everyone” instead of “the ten-thousandth guy who can tie reality in knots just showed up” this week).
Really, the best solution is preventing mutants from being born. They’ve done it a couple times. It was a background detail in Logan and a plot point for a while after House of M and maybe in a couple other cases I don’t know about. They always treat it as a bad thing though, instead of having the rational reaction, which is: “oh thank god someone just unloaded the cosmic gun that’s pointed at our heads.”
If it was a Black guy we might get some "dindu nuffin, he wuz framed" stuff.
Are we sure it isn’t a satire?
Thanks. OP is a huge faggot about this.
It could be described that way, yes. That doesn't mean that it's a card game, and it also doesn't mean that positioning and terrain isn't a big part of managing that risk.
The problem with secession is that there was already a civil war fought over it, and I don’t think the government from which people are hoping to secede is any more willing—probably less willing, frankly—to let people go than the other one was. Any political body voting for succession has to understand that they need to be ready and willing to fight a war to back up their vote, which makes people very hesitant to support it.
I doubt that the orgy members of a degenerate sex club put too much thought into the logical consistency of their sex vocalizations.
Hey, I’m sure a lot of their crowd is self-immunocompromised enough for covid to actually be dangerous. Not that the vaccines help, of course.
Is this article not arguing that women can’t win unless men let them win? That doesn’t exactly make women come off as extremely competent, competitive, or qualified….
In addition to what Adam said about hit chances, positioning affects line of sight, which affects the stealth and pod activation (which definitely have problems, but not to the degree that I’d call them “fake”). Positioning also affects AoE, availability of cover, ability to reach objectives, some environmental hazards, and the effective range of many abilities. To call it all fake and say it’s actually a card battle game is so strange that I can only assume you’ve either never played the game, completely failed to communicate your idea, or are reaching so hard to say something revelatory that you’ve diverted your point into retarded.
Lindsay is his own kind of cuckoo, though. Spends more time friendly firing against imaginary Christian theocracy-fascists than he does worrying about the people that actually have institutional power. He definitely has some good understanding and explanation of some things, but I’d worry about using him as an authoritative figure for anyone who might go haring off into his “both sides but actually the right scares me more” mindset.
You and u/Kalamander85 have asked the same (reasonable) question, and all I can say is that honestly, I was 50/50. Between the art style and the obesity, it could go either way.
Somebody call the Dustborn they'll use their trigger warnings and words as weapons to save the day!
Based on the gameplay clips I’ve seen, they also do a fair amount of beating people and robots up with baseball bats.
In the 1970s, “don’t Californicate Colorado” wouldn’t necessarily have meant “don’t go left,” would it? It used to go right more often before Reagan gave amnesty to all those illegals.
Right, but lots of jobs are tedious, some are tedious and awful and dangerous, and they still need to get done, by the people who are being paid to do them.
I assume “torture” and “rage” refer to her cardiovascular system if ever the monstrous bandit raider has to do any physical exertion?
There was one attractive one. They killed off at the beginning in order to set up for her frumpy sister.
She’s sorry to be here.
Also, if they happen to be using “orcs” as slang for “Russians,” it’s appropriate to laugh at videos of their deaths.
For a while, GG had a lot of presence on 4Chan, and 4Chan makes anime mascot girls for basically everything. I don't know that there was ever more to it than that, although I do think that among the people that were concerned about the allegations of misogyny—either because they had not yet realized what leftism was like or because they were and remain leftists themselves—having a female mascot that was possessed of a normal, not hambeast body but also not dressed in a bikini was appealing in much the same way #NotYourShield was.
"Vivian James" is supposed to sound like "Video Games," and the clover on her headband is a nod to the 4chan logo. There are probably also details behind some of the other design choices, but I've forgotten them.