I watched part of a let's play and I think if you generally agree with the sentiments of this board, it won't be for you. The writing/dialogue is quite poor and the characters do not feel compelling.
I'm tempted to buy and refund it and post an ironic "it's not woke enough" negative review to farm massive Steam points and ever-so-slightly offset its undeserved 98% rating.
That happens with law all the time too though. It can feel bad to want to hit someone and realize there are consequences, but most of the time you recognize the good in that the law should be preventing randoms from doing the same to you or your children.
The comfort of community and belief in God and the afterlife etc. outweighs the bad overall. Impulsivity will lead to clashing with all kinds of things that mostly feel good, whether it's religion, law, romance, whatever. Just because it doesn't always feel good doesn't mean it doesn't feel good overall. I bet that's true for being gay, which was what this example was originally about.
While I agree this Seder guy got absolutely pantsed, I think there's a distinction between preference -- which suggests the possibility of choice -- and a seemingly self-evident sense of fairness that isn't the product of conscious choice or decision-making.
I also don't think saying "feels good" as a way to undermine whatever Seder's position is is completely fair since adherence to faith and devotion also feels good.
I'm seeing two nights, 1) open to women and non-surgery trannies, and 2) open to women and people without dicks. Even now their diction isn't clear by their own woke standards, because if a MtF tranny has had bottom surgery, aren't they then "phallus-free" and qualify for the real women's night? Real women will get the chance to be gawked at by the hardcore tranny fetishists who went all the way but are still awkward, broad-shouldered, hairy fatasses. Dope.
These people are fucking retards and deserve all the hate they'll get from the left on this.
There is so much talk of Canadians being united against the US because of the tariffs and all I have to say to that is "horse shit." I'm just as against Trudeau now as I've ever been, and the Liberals using this "crisis" to consolidate power and rally dipshit Canadians to pay more for Canadian products that have already opportunistically gone up in price is hilarious. Keep burning your paychecks on your empty suicidal empathy and virtual signaling you absolute retards.
There's absolutely no way her research shows that or diversity as the left envisions it would have taken over businesses organically. Someone needs to go through her data and point out all the inaccuracies and fraudulent reporting that must be there.
“The US is turning predator, and so what Canada needs to do is work closely with our democratic allies, our military allies. I would start with our Nordic partners, specifically Denmark who is also being threatened, and our NATO European allies. I would be sure that France and Britain were there who possess nuclear weapons and I will be working urgently with these partners to build a closer security relationship that guarantees our security in a time when United States can be a threat.”
The video where her lunacy is on full display can be seen in the tweet here.
Be careful what you wish for. With leftists comparing themselves with Tank Man these days, you may see a bunch of unproductive losers who receive perfectly fine pay burning down factories because they think they deserve more income for even less work.
Impossible to say, however...
In 2015, a federal statistics agency in Canada (StatCan) released a report based on census data that included self-reported rates of spousal violence victimisation. My recall of the numbers isn't perfect, but I believe 342,000 women reported being the victims of spousal violence... as did 420,000 men. To me, this suggested a massive underrporting in official violent offenses against men. StatCan has since changed how these numbers are reported and women are overrepresented by a huge margin now.
If you look at police statistics in Canadian provinces, they characterise their numbers as "police-reported" so those numbers can't be trusted at all.
There may be something to that, but I think overall it's more simple: women don't face consequences for "small" displays of violence, and they're less in control when emotional. Culturally, how often do you see slapping represented as an acceptable response from a woman to something a man says or does? TV/movies are riddled with it.
When it comes to the unusually high rate of violence between lesbians, I think that's mostly just a product of there now being two women whose violent responses have been normalised. On top of that, throw lesbian bed death into the mix for some extra frustration and volatility.
Agreed, though I would characterise their complex differently. They're somehow inferior and superior at the same time within the same dynamic. E.g., feminists think women are more competent and capable than men, but a meritocracy somehow doesn't recognise that so affirmative action is necessary.
I read this book as a 12-year-old so pardon any misinterpretations, but I remember Atticus being portrayed as a tired but resolute man who knew the politics of his court case would hurt his reputation but was determined to do the right thing anyway. I also thought 'Scout' described him very affectionately and the writer approached him with fondness. Did I miss the boat?
Fake tits are definitely not for me. I'd rather small, imperfect boobs than stupid looking bubbles that reveal a woman's complete fixation on vanity.