Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

69
James Lindsey is not anti communist, he's antifa. (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by Telia 1 year ago by Telia +69 / -0
32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ 32 ▼
– Hugs 32 points 1 year ago +32 / -0

What a gross, grifting sellout. Pro-Tip: It's never time to stop attacking communism.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 19 ▼
– GoldenInnosStatue 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

how small is his hat and how small is his penis?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– yeldarb1983 17 points 1 year ago +17 / -0

...why don't we cut out the middleman and go after socialism in general?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 83671R18 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

All these commies look the same to me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

that's what i'm saying though. communism is just one branch... as is fascism, as is nazism, socialism is the root.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 83671R18 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Ah, I'm of the opinion that Chaim Hirschel Mordechai's Marxism, (sponsored by the Rothschild gang's prominent figures of that time) is the root cause behind every socialist-flavored movement of today. This is why I have no issue with calling the commies for what they are - leeches upon the very existence of mankind itself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– SendTomBoys 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

A good American attacks both, Jew

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ActiveLurker 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

What a fucking faggot

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– MartinRigggs 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Is he jewish? Seems like it to me, but maybe he’s just owned by the jew

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– fauxgnaws 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Wikipedia doesn't give him their gold star.

They're pretty good at sniffin' them out since they think it's a badge of honor.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– MartinRigggs 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Wikipedia works hard to cover up who is and isn’t a jew nowadays…..there was a time when like 2 specific editors made thousands of early life’s on jews in our world, they did great things for our movement, opened a lot of eyes, but those editors were removed and now, unless it’s a well known fact that the person of interest is actually a jew, as in it’s been published publicly at least 3 times, they will not include that info on Wikipedia. That change happened back in like 2021 or some shit, I can’t remember exactly when. Even with the changes to Wikipedia’s early life’s policy, I’m guessing that any jew who is exposed on Wikipedia can have that info removed even if it is public, just to make it a little more difficult for the goyim to prove it’s “every single time”.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Wikipedia works hard to cover up who is and isn’t a jew nowadays…..

After citing Wikipedia for years, the Stormfags now get upset that there are people whom they hate who aren't Jewish... so their obvious conclusion is that Wikipedia is covering it up.

unless it’s a well known fact that the person of interest is actually a jew, as in it’s been published publicly at least 3 times, they will not include that info on Wikipedia.

As opposed to when you don't like someone?

just to make it a little more difficult for the goyim to prove it’s “every single time”.

Stormfags making a total fool of themselves 'every single time'.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MartinRigggs 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

Cry harder….if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. That’s why I said he’s probably a jew, but it’s entirely possible he’s just a dumb fuck who has an affinity for jews like several million brainwashed boomers who don’t know any better…it’s also possible he’s an influencer being paid by JIDF or some other jewish group to shill in their favor, that’s certainly not unheard of. What I said about Wikipedia’s early life policy is 100% true, here’s the article where the policy is discussed: https://www.commentary.org/articles/edward-kosner/jew-tagging-wikipedia/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Cry harder….

Crying from laughing at your stupid, worthless ass?

if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it’s probably a duck

If me no like this guy, he's a JOOOOO!

but it’s entirely possible he’s just a dumb fuck who has an affinity for jews like several million brainwashed boomers

It's entirely possible that he's just... not a Nazi? Wow, someone give you a medal for that amazing revelation.

it’s also possible he’s an influencer being paid by JIDF or some other jewish group to shill in their favor

Oh, you sure have it figured out. Alternatively, maybe he just has a brain, and thus doesn't like Nazis.

What I said about Wikipedia’s early life policy is 100% true

It's rather revealing that you're admitting that your fellow Nazis were rewriting Wikipedia. All the more reason to point out that Wikipedia is trash.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MartinRigggs 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I’d put money on your early life being jewish also.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– redman012 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Antonio is an Arab who doesn’t practice Islam.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MartinRigggs 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yes (((Arab)))

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Wow, no kidding, a Nazi thinks that everyone who isn't a Nazi is a Jew!

You'd embarrass yourself slightly less if you heil Hitler'ed yourself to actually finding out who Antonio Of Venice was...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Had to check the username twice to make sure this wasn't gozortnik or Grumman. GG

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's shocking that 'theaustrianpainter' has no substantive response.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 83671R18 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory'. Or, remember that time when the paki rape gangs were called a 'moral panic' by the current wikipedia editors? So yes, wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.

Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.

Why are you trying to divert attention from the censoring of nu-wikipedia? What are you so scared of?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched

And how do precisely do you judge 'well researched'?

It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory', like how you attack community members on this site as '9/11 truthers',

So you are a truther. It's OK, I don't mind.

Why are you trying to divert attention from the actions of nu-wikipedia's censorship?

I mean, the Nazi who commented earlier literally complained that he can't go around labeling everyone he doesn't like a Jew because it has to be 'well-documented'.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 83671R18 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And how do precisely do you judge 'well researched'?

Just go read the original article's sources. It was quite informative.

So you are a truther. It's OK, I don't mind.

Oh look, its the party of Trust the $cience demanding that I obey the "fact$" or else I'll be labeled a 'truther'.

Scary, scary.

I mean, the Nazi who commented earlier literally complained that he can't go around labeling everyone he doesn't like a Jew because it has to be 'well-documented'.

You label everyone who doesn't parrot your opinions to you a nazi or a truther or something, then you complain about people who want to make sure they're not about to make a mistake?

I know you're stupid, but this really does exceed my expectations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Just go read the original article's sources. It was quite informative.

But how do you judge the quality of those sources?

its the party of Trust the $cience

I am? Who knew? And party? You're very confused, but that's OK.

else I'll be labeled a 'truther'.

Whatever you want to call it. You denied thinking that Mosad did it.

then you complain about people who want to make sure they're not about to make a mistake?

Again, this is just confusion. That's what the Nazi was complaining about.

I know you're stupid, but this really does exceed my expectations.

Glad to outperform.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 12 ▼
– SuurSuomi39_II 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Only good way to look at communists is from 6ft above.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Why not both?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– somercet 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

James is a f--king radical centrist.

There's another X account, eigenrobot, pretty amusing, but one day posted that the triumphalism on the Right is now disturbing him just as the Left's triumphalism did. He's the same.

Whereas I, an old-time classical Liberal, realized that society only moves by lurches to the Left and Right, accompanied by howls of both triumph and despair, and that the GOP leadership will screw us in the end.

So James flipped out that the "woke right" (I howl) was posting images of Archangel Michael, and I tried to tell him that when you import 30m Catholics, they will shit up your feed with Michael icons, regardless of how "national socialist" Trump is going to be.

And btw, I love Trump 2.0, I wish him victory over the GOPe, and YES! I voted for exactly this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Whereas I, an old-time classical Liberal, realized that society only moves by lurches to the Left and Right, accompanied by howls of both triumph and despair, and that the GOP leadership will screw us in the end.

Yes, very good point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– realerfunction 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

they're the same picture

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DemolitionsPanda 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Fascism is Communism!

The largest, most extreme Fascist nation today is China as run by the CCP!

WTF James?

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy