James Lindsey is not anti communist, he's antifa.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
After citing Wikipedia for years, the Stormfags now get upset that there are people whom they hate who aren't Jewish... so their obvious conclusion is that Wikipedia is covering it up.
As opposed to when you don't like someone?
Stormfags making a total fool of themselves 'every single time'.
Cry harder….if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. That’s why I said he’s probably a jew, but it’s entirely possible he’s just a dumb fuck who has an affinity for jews like several million brainwashed boomers who don’t know any better…it’s also possible he’s an influencer being paid by JIDF or some other jewish group to shill in their favor, that’s certainly not unheard of. What I said about Wikipedia’s early life policy is 100% true, here’s the article where the policy is discussed: https://www.commentary.org/articles/edward-kosner/jew-tagging-wikipedia/
Crying from laughing at your stupid, worthless ass?
If me no like this guy, he's a JOOOOO!
It's entirely possible that he's just... not a Nazi? Wow, someone give you a medal for that amazing revelation.
Oh, you sure have it figured out. Alternatively, maybe he just has a brain, and thus doesn't like Nazis.
It's rather revealing that you're admitting that your fellow Nazis were rewriting Wikipedia. All the more reason to point out that Wikipedia is trash.
I’d put money on your early life being jewish also.
Antonio is an Arab who doesn’t practice Islam.
Yes (((Arab)))
Wow, no kidding, a Nazi thinks that everyone who isn't a Nazi is a Jew!
You'd embarrass yourself slightly less if you heil Hitler'ed yourself to actually finding out who Antonio Of Venice was...
Had to check the username twice to make sure this wasn't gozortnik or Grumman. GG
It's shocking that 'theaustrianpainter' has no substantive response.
Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory'. Or, remember that time when the paki rape gangs were called a 'moral panic' by the current wikipedia editors? So yes, wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.
Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.
Why are you trying to divert attention from the censoring of nu-wikipedia? What are you so scared of?
And how do precisely do you judge 'well researched'?
So you are a truther. It's OK, I don't mind.
I mean, the Nazi who commented earlier literally complained that he can't go around labeling everyone he doesn't like a Jew because it has to be 'well-documented'.
Just go read the original article's sources. It was quite informative.
Oh look, its the party of Trust the $cience demanding that I obey the "fact$" or else I'll be labeled a 'truther'.
Scary, scary.
You label everyone who doesn't parrot your opinions to you a nazi or a truther or something, then you complain about people who want to make sure they're not about to make a mistake?
I know you're stupid, but this really does exceed my expectations.
But how do you judge the quality of those sources?
I am? Who knew? And party? You're very confused, but that's OK.
Whatever you want to call it. You denied thinking that Mosad did it.
Again, this is just confusion. That's what the Nazi was complaining about.
Glad to outperform.