James Lindsey is not anti communist, he's antifa.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory'. Or, remember that time when the paki rape gangs were called a 'moral panic' by the current wikipedia editors? So yes, wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.
Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.
Why are you trying to divert attention from the censoring of nu-wikipedia? What are you so scared of?
And how do precisely do you judge 'well researched'?
So you are a truther. It's OK, I don't mind.
I mean, the Nazi who commented earlier literally complained that he can't go around labeling everyone he doesn't like a Jew because it has to be 'well-documented'.
Just go read the original article's sources. It was quite informative.
Oh look, its the party of Trust the $cience demanding that I obey the "fact$" or else I'll be labeled a 'truther'.
Scary, scary.
You label everyone who doesn't parrot your opinions to you a nazi or a truther or something, then you complain about people who want to make sure they're not about to make a mistake?
I know you're stupid, but this really does exceed my expectations.
But how do you judge the quality of those sources?
I am? Who knew? And party? You're very confused, but that's OK.
Whatever you want to call it. You denied thinking that Mosad did it.
Again, this is just confusion. That's what the Nazi was complaining about.
Glad to outperform.
It directly quotes your masters and the intentions of the Frankfurt School, in their own words.
See that? You're asking about sources instead of actually using wikipedia's inbuilt functions that help track article vandalism. You clearly have no intention of ever reading the actual article and following up on its sources.
I just namedropped the name of one of your masters and it was enough for you to run and hide.
You sure are. You're labeling anyone who dares question your opinions as a "nazi". Then you wonder why there are so many nazis.
And I see you ignored the paki rape gang situation being 'edited' into a "moral panic" on wikipedia. See, that's how I know what you are.
Not really, I succeeded in profiling you. Your methods follow the exact same line as every other democrat party thug and muslim apologist I've broken.
And besides, I can tell this is bothering you. You lot called everyone 'nazis' so much that it doesn't really faze anyone anymore - so you are on a new "BAD MAN" term; 'truther'. All this desperate flailing from you because I proved that yes, wikipedia does censor reality. The fact that you desperately label anyone who dares think beyond the (often flawed) declarations of the mainstream media as a "truther" really does show how much the disobedience bothers you.
Show me where I said that. Direct quotes only. None of this 'according to sources familiar with the thinking' bullshit you leftards pull.
Nah, you're just coping at this point because damn, you suck at PR.
Ha no, you ran like a wretched coward. Come back! Things were getting really funny!
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19AduVcUTp/x/c/4eRSO0EvDOP