2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've watched a few clips on YouTube, but not the full videos. From what I've seen they look good.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

While I share this concern, and have already seen leftists calling for the deaths of other, undeserving targets, I'm not going to condemn a man who Did Nothing Wrong^TM just to make an example out of him and deter copycats.

9
Grumman 9 points ago +9 / -0

You can watch the video - she was saying why she was going to throw the book at him immediately before the attack. Appealing to statistics or bias to claim she was going to give him a slap on the wrist when you have video evidence that you are wrong is retarded.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wikipedia says they included Squirrel Girl (Marvel's patient zero) but none of the other usual suspects that are obvious red flags yet.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everyone wanted Epstein dead - it's bound to be way easier to persuade a prison guard to look the other way while you murder him if the victim has already been let off with a slap on the wrist once for pimping out teenage girls. This guy assassinated the CEO of the worst health insurer in the industry - a man whose company defrauded countless people who were forced by the government to do business with him. Epstein has more in common with the man he assassinated than with him.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

You could classify it alongside "Islam is right about women" where the text and the subtext are in opposition so it requires some prior knowledge of the meta, while for "it's okay to be white" the text and the subtext are in alignment.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it was a fed op they wouldn't have made him an Ivy League anti-capitalist. Look at the article - "he has a Republican cousin" is the closest they could get to pinning this on the right.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

but he brought a gun to the assassination that didn't even cycle.

My guess would be that he was using underpowered ammunition rather than a faulty weapon. He was already using a silencer, so subsonic ammunition would be a plausible choice even if it wasn't enough to reliably power the semi-automatic action of the pistol.

18
Grumman 18 points ago +18 / -0

Because it's a ridiculously profitable goldmine that they haven't collapsed yet, even with the core audience screeching at its creator's heresy.

-17
Grumman -17 points ago +2 / -19

You say that because your hatred of Jews has made you retarded. Attacking the enemy of your enemy is not vengeance.

-19
Grumman -19 points ago +3 / -22

Her father was a partisan fighting against Nazi Germany after the invasion of Poland. He failed to raise his daughter to not be a treasonous piece of shit, but his waging war against the invading force that murdered his parents doesn't deserve your spite.

10
Grumman 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'll recommend the movie of Battle Royale - it's not a pleasant movie, but it is a good movie. IIRC, the manga and book were more questionable, but that's second-hand information.

And while I haven't watched Squid Game, as I understand it they are two very different premises. A deadly Takashi's Castle is not the same thing as a fight to the death.

0
Grumman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Zelensky is an actor styling himself as a militia commander. Neither an actual militia commander looking like the copycat nor another grifter copying the copy would be surprising.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but not for the reasons people like to believe. Communism had a Jew in its most influential position from the start, but that's because Marx hated Judaism as a capitalist religion in its most negative sense. Communism is more like the oil heiress with daddy issues than a secret agent.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're proud because they're a small team that got namedropped alongside some giants of the genre. There's nothing wrong with that.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fetterman has always had a soft spot for criminals - I think this might be him actually being consistent in his beliefs, unlike your average anarcho-tyrant who will fawn over murderers and rapists but try to annihilate the good man who defends himself.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not about the vaccine. If someone was murderously angry about their health insurance claim being denied for vaccine-related injuries they'd shoot the CEO of Pfizer or J&J, not UnitedHealthcare. You're also making the assumption that someone suffering from severe cardiopulmonary injuries decided that outrunning the cops on a bicycle was a viable strategy.

Since UnitedHealthcare is apparently the worst company for denying health insurance claims, my and most people's guess is that they screwed over one of their customers and their next of kin took revenge.

30
Grumman 30 points ago +31 / -1

They're a degenerate. You can tell they're a degenerate because they posted this. "They're a degenerate, but also on Mossad's payroll" is not required to explain their behaviour.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The United Kingdom bans the advertising of prescription medicines to the general public. I feel like this ad violates the spirit of that rule.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can respect the first guy - failing to account for just how much torque the tail rotor has to balance out is closer to success than most.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Tell me you don't understand Rudy without telling me you don't understand Rudy.

My understanding of Rudy's position is that the tail should be allowed to wag the dog: rather than the secondary market existing to allow players to obtain the cards they need to build a deck given the limitations of Wizards' limited print run, blind packed distribution, Wizards should attempt to maximise secondary market profits to maximise their sales to fourth-party resellers at the expense of their sales to players. The reason I believe this is because of his explicit dislike of the "game pieces" faction (that Wizards should respond to undersupply of in-demand cards by reprinting them, increasing the player base, reducing the effects of external economics on competitive integrity and directly increasing their own sales to the players) and also the fact that he fell for MetaZoo, a game which sold itself on collector-focused gimmicks like a Reserve List but without the fundamentals to make it worth collecting.

Ah, there it is. Tell me you're a filthy commie without telling me you're a filthy commie.

The market is not the purpose of the market. Thinking people should treat shares like the partial ownership of a company and not just an up-market form of betting on greyhounds doesn't make me a communist.

71
Grumman 71 points ago +72 / -1

In principle, banning kids from social media is a good thing. You still have to worry about the teachers, but not giving every freak on the planet access to try to groom your kids should be common sense.

The real problem is the expectation that adults will be compelled to prove they're not children by exposing their identities, which will be a tool to suppress and punish dissent.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›