color-blind
Term from the anti-racist narrative of the time one of their consistent tactics is to respin older anti-racist narrative as somehow suddenly being "racist".
Here's how it probably would have been written before they rewrote it:
The national realtors’ organization has created a sales kit that suggests realtors should focus on freedom and avoid discussion of negative emotionally charged subjects such as race. It provided form speeches, q&a's, and press releases to encourage people to move and buy houses. Freedom meant that you could own property and live where you wanted - a narrative that appealed to everyone including blacks who's ex-slave ancestors had been prohibited from owning property.
It's like a disease or something, they take their own anti-racism narrative and use it to claim their continued attacks.
Why should I differentiate between black people and criminals?
1. Get dumb white women to tear down white men and remove them at work.
2. Snicker as you go on and on about "helping disadvantaged black people" that you know you'll never do.
3. In reality fill all those spots with indians from overseas.
4. Become Twitter CEO and Profit.
I've worked in tech, indians are very good at a lot of things white guys take a beating if they try to do - heavy in-group favoritism, dressing well, telling the lies needed to get ahead, etc etc. I'm rather jealous of them honestly.
Indians are the majority-race in tech, it's not surprising to see them playing tribal/racial politics and displacing dumb white people who can't get their women to stop shooting themselves in the foot.
This isn't idle speculation - I work in tech and once you get an indian boss or a majority of indians on the team the team, everyone non-indian will be fired or pushed out within the next year or two.
Unlike dumb white people, indians are very good at working together as a group and keeping "outsiders" out of their group, and it's very effective.
If you've worked with Indians in tech you know they love this stuff.
And who wouldn't? You can get white women to tear down the white men and beat them out of their jobs. "disadvantaged black people" are the tool you use to do it.
Then you replace everyone with indian-only team.
If you've worked with indians they are very very good at playing ego-politics.
1. Get rid of white male competitors at work via encouraging dumb white women to constantly attack them.
2. Replace with indian-only team.
3. Profit.
then he implied that was christians and religious people
So...here's the thing, though.
Joe Biden is catholic.
Nancy Pelosi is catholic.
The tactics they're using - of invoking moral questions then uses those to sorta steal your morality from you - and beat you with it - are very catholic.
This certainly seems more like a war between 2 religions nowadays, than it does a war for or against a religion.
Kristalnach from nazi germany has started to sound very familiar:
On the night of November 9, 1938, violent anti-Jewish demonstrations broke out across Germany, Austria, and the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. Nazi officials depicted the riots as justified reactions to the assassination of German foreign official Ernst vom Rath, who had been shot two days earlier by Herschel Grynszpan, a 17-year old Polish Jew distraught over the deportation of his family from Germany.
.
Over the next 48 hours, violent mobs, spurred by antisemitic exhortations from Nazi officials, destroyed hundreds of synagogues, burning or desecrating Jewish religious artifacts along the way. Acting on orders from Gestapo headquarters, police officers and firefighters did nothing to prevent the destruction. All told, approximately 7,500 Jewish-owned businesses, homes, and schools were plundered, and 91 Jews were murdered. An additional 30,000 Jewish men were arrested and sent to concentration camps. Nazi officials immediately claimed that the Jews themselves were to blame for the riots, and a fine of one billion reichsmarks (about $400 million at 1938 rates) was imposed on the German Jewish community.
No, I understand, it just seems like as typical you're several steps behind where we actually are.
They're playing with the primitive parts of the brain that watch out for threats and react with a unhinged survival-level of aggression to utterly destroy the threat. The realization that a lion is stalking and killing members of your tribe, the realization that a new person showed up and your suddenly tribe members are disappearing being silently killed by this person, when you hear that new people showed up and everyone ended up with a disease that was killing them.
It is a primitive desire to kill and destroy that "other thing" that is a consistent threat.
This is why they're dangerous, they're fictionalizing a primitive "kill or be killed" response.
The real counter argument against the "this trial proves systemic racism" narrative is the Rittenhouse trial's prosecutor. A lawyer that has to be a white supremacist in an inherently racist justice system tried to railroad another White person. He is literally the argument for justice system reform in this case, but the left refuses to acknowledge it more than superficially because it shatters their "muh blax is victims" narrative.
This would be the right response if it was a one-off just-looks-this-way-by coincidence design.
You may have noticed this hasn't worked for year because it's organized deliberately as a hate group who's literally at the point of declaring open season on killing white people.
I don't know exactly what to do, but I know your strategy of treating them like innocent people who just accidentally got the wrong idea clearly has clearly resulted in them continuing and gaining steam.
What should I be noticing besides the insanity?
" I have no doubt that our nation’s criminal justice system operates justly for white people and dispenses cruel and unusual punishment for Black and brown people."
There's no black people in the case.
The point of what they're doing is to force you to humiliate yourself in order to function.
it seems inconsistent but once you realize this it's not. They believe that being misgendered is incredibly humiliating, and their goal is to force you to constantly misgender (aka humiliate, harm, degrade) yourself in order to be "allowed" to function.
Self-flagellation is the disciplinary and devotional practice of flogging oneself with whips or other instruments that inflict pain. In Christianity, self-flagellation is practiced in the context of the doctrine of the mortification of the flesh and is seen as a spiritual discipline. It is often used as a form of penance and is intended to allow the flagellant to share in the sufferings of Jesus, bringing his or her focus to God.
Some of the prosecutor speeches from the rittenhouse trial seemed like they were pulled right off of the internet.
I think maybe the news caught up to the existence of something called "the web" and a communication medium known as "internet forums"...
If you look at the article (which is archived) it's like symbol of left-wing degeneracy.
1. He's not wearing a shirt, and -
2. His chest is color to make it look like he has breasts,
3. His "mother" is leaning over him in a pose that resembles a porno, with her hand curved to grope his right breast.
It's like heavy political trolling where you try to get your opponent to post your own propaganda themselves.
Every time they pass a law like this, they almost immediately prove that someone - usually a woman, but sometimes the da's office - will immediately abuse it.
You had a bad day at work. You get on the train to go home. Some woman who's had a few drinks and her boyfriend dumped her ass decides you look like her boyfriend and she's gonna come at you to blow off steam.
The train stops and suddenly cops come on the train and demand to know why you've been sending her pics of your dick. You haven't of course but she has of someone's dick on her phone and claims they're from you.
You get arrested. The next day you're late to work because you spent the night in jail. Your boss is in a foul mood and fires you.
The da mixes up your case with someone elses. The judge is tired of angry people and you're angry and exhausted and finds you guilty.
Your have 100k of debt in a medical field, and with a "sexual" offense on your record no one will hire you.
You can't pay your rent. You end up homeless and die frozen on the street.
And what enormous offense was this weapon that killed you created for?
So a woman didn't have to press "no don't accept" on her phone.
One of the most amusing videos I've seen is comparing women's comments on video's of other women.
If the other woman is ugly the comment section is full of "oh you're beautiful honey!".
If the other woman is attractive the comment section is full of petty deameaning or halfhearted remarks.
Ironically Racist Media, assuming people with a long criminal history who were assaulting people at a riot, must be black.
Joseph Rosenbaum, a 36-year-old convicted paedophile who chased...through the streets during a Black Lives Matter riot...Anthony Huber, a 26-year-old with convictions for strangulation and suffocation and domestic abuse who bludgeoned Rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard and appeared to try and grab his rifle; and Gaige Grosskreutz, a 28-year-old with a range of convictions for offences including striking his grandmother, felony burglary, and prowling...
This is spot on, for a while it's been clear they claim to be "against the thing" as an excuse to be doing the thing themselves.
Against sexism? They're about to engage in the most sexist assholery possible.
Against racism? They're about to be the most openly racist people you've ever met.
Anti-facist...
From the side of Defund The Police...
This situation represents an outrageous failure to protect protesters by the Kenosha Police Department and the Kenosha Sherriffs Department
Feel like I'm reading a script from a cheesy out of work made-for-tv writer.
Let's be honest, neurotic white women.