No, I understand, it just seems like as typical you're several steps behind where we actually are.

They're playing with the primitive parts of the brain that watch out for threats and react with a unhinged survival-level of aggression to utterly destroy the threat. The realization that a lion is stalking and killing members of your tribe, the realization that a new person showed up and your suddenly tribe members are disappearing being silently killed by this person, when you hear that new people showed up and everyone ended up with a disease that was killing them.

It is a primitive desire to kill and destroy that "other thing" that is a consistent threat.

This is why they're dangerous, they're fictionalizing a primitive "kill or be killed" response.

The real counter argument against the "this trial proves systemic racism" narrative is the Rittenhouse trial's prosecutor. A lawyer that has to be a white supremacist in an inherently racist justice system tried to railroad another White person. He is literally the argument for justice system reform in this case, but the left refuses to acknowledge it more than superficially because it shatters their "muh blax is victims" narrative.

This would be the right response if it was a one-off just-looks-this-way-by coincidence design.

You may have noticed this hasn't worked for year because it's organized deliberately as a hate group who's literally at the point of declaring open season on killing white people.

I don't know exactly what to do, but I know your strategy of treating them like innocent people who just accidentally got the wrong idea clearly has clearly resulted in them continuing and gaining steam.