6
GhostBond 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Child Groomers ban the phrase 'groomer'.

18
GhostBond 18 points ago +18 / -0

"as the mother [of] one transgender child and one pansexual child"

I guess I'm not surprised that someone who's mentally abused and dominated their own children into a mental disorder, wants to do the same to everyone else's children.

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean I honestly kinda wonder, who is behind making sure the left remains fanatical?

Is it someone who thinks this will gain them power or is it someone who is deliberately sabotaging them?

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black Excellence

I think you got totally the wrong take on this.

You're repeating the idea that defending yourself is "bad" - the attitude that is getting you absolutely run over. Yeah it's clumsy and not quite right. But you should be going for "yeah I have a right to defend myself and the people around me" rather than parroting back the attitude that it's always bad when you defend yourself or the people around you.

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

Youtube, because they were demonitizing her videos.

21
GhostBond 21 points ago +21 / -0

This actually perfectly summarizes why the feminist narrative of "it's mostly men who are violent" is deliberately misleading...at best.

This isn't the uncensored version of this, there's a longer version out there. It goes -
1. Will Smith is laughing.
2. His wife (not the woman smiling behind him but the woman across from him), express flips into this mean angry rage look.
3. Suddenly will smith is getting violent.

His wife wants/demands that he get violent on her behalf - so he gets violent. He wouldn't have been violent if she wasn't there. The violence happened because of her desire for violence to happen. She just offloaded it onto him to do.

Seriously, at least half the time I've seen violence break out, it's a woman behind it causing it to happen. Not always...but a lot.

5
GhostBond 5 points ago +7 / -2

I read that he did that because some dude tried to forcibly kiss him. I don't know man, I mean physical violence to defend yourself against someone trying to be physically aggressive to you seems like it should be entirely acceptable.

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. It's even mentioned by the researcher in the article.

“Radicalization is not necessarily the main issue among incels. Only a small minority of them actually endorse radical ideas, and an even tinier minority have ever acted out on them,” she said in an interview. “My work has been consistent in that the relationship between ideology and radical action is extremely weak.”
...
Jesse Morton, one of its lead researchers, said he believes most academic research has relied too heavily on the radicalization trajectories of the relatively small number of incels that have carried out acts of violence.
.
“Data shows that very few people that hold radical ideologies go on to commit acts of violence and if you stigmatize them, you can actually facilitate greater violence,” Morton said.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women like calling other women "sluts".

Whoever organizes these political things pushed "incel" to do the same thing. It's saying "you made undesirable sexual choices so you are invalid".

You take that 18th century hysteria about women having sex outside of wedlock, apply it to men, bam "incel" is the word for slut/harlot/homebreaker/etc.

4
GhostBond 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imp catches shit because his worldview isn’t just dysgenic - it’s as dysgenic as it is possible to be.

His narrative is literally the feminist mindset, with the genders reversed.

6
GhostBond 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know of 1 female mass shooter.
And 2 trans shooters.

The roster of who goes on an unhinged shooting spree is the most diverse group you've ever seen, genders, skin colors, sexual orientation, etc. Literally everyone is represented.

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

Per their definition, I don't know why they're trying to add a 2nd woman to the supreme court when we already have clarence thomas.

We already have 6 brave women (who happen to be able to grow beards) on the bench, why do we need more?

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

I enjoy watching several of these channels and I wouldn't be surprised if they're chinese propaganda channels.

They're not like "devious plan to subvert people!" kind of propaganda, they're more like "see we're just like you!" kind of stuff.

You have corporate corruption? See! - our big company defaulting on loans, big problems, no reason to envy us - we're just like you!

You have big problems? See! - samsung pulling factory out, workers upset, big unemployement - we're just like you!

You have women and marriage problems? See! Look at the girls as a result of childs 1 child policy, also uptight, status chasing, not wanting to get married, and not having kids - we're just like you!

It's really enjoyable propaganda.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's saying the same people that started Afghanistan are involved with Ukraine. And he's right.

Right.

In one set of theories it's people doing evil things for selfish reasons. Weapons manufactures who want to sell weapons. Psychos who just like going to war with no regard for humanity.

In another set of theories it's people who try to keep society from descending into self destruction. Humans evolved to constantly go through a few different phases - growth, expansion and war, calm after the war starts biting both sides hard causing them to stop wanting them to do it. They've every other manipulation they can think of to take the place of war and finally just went "fuck it it's not working, we'll fall back to another war".

2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting thoughts...

This also goes to the idea of racial purity and that you can't actually become more white, only less white.

It's because of how colors, the eyes, and the brain work -

In reality, if you have a white male and a black female interbreed, the child will be some kind of mixed race.

Look at this picture for example -
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMWQ3NDUwYmMtYzZlNy00YzU3LTkyYTktNDM3YTBiNzJiYWYyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzQxMDc5MzE@.V1.jpg

What race would you describe her as? Black. But if you broke it down, you might say she's 70% white and 30% black.

People aren't categorizing people into non-white because of some "racial purity" concepts (well the average people aren't) it's based on it's effect on visual appearance.

2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Russel Brand said some crazy stat that like when trump lost office CNN lost like 80% of it's viewership, and nowadays like 40% of self identified liberals watch fox news.

9
GhostBond 9 points ago +9 / -0

Film executive Paul Roeder and Disney Parks marketing executive Lisa Becket will oversee the effort, the company said.

Hmm, a woman at the center of this push? Why does this sound familiar.

8
GhostBond 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can't be the only one that feels like it's a bit coincidental that the US spends 20 years in afghanistan, and within a few months of getting out another world superpower suddenly invades a country.

20
GhostBond 20 points ago +20 / -0

If you date a black girl in America you also have to deal with them being black being a part of your daily life and conversation, which isn’t easy given the climate Jews and leftist made for them.

Yeah, I've met skinny attractive black girls, they dems racial rhetoric has definitely pushed me from "I barely noticed at all and didn't care about skin color if she was attractive" to "no way would that work long term - think of all the racial issues your kid would have".

4
GhostBond 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is why political groups love women; if you control the social narrative, women will repeat anything you put there.

It's also why women need men around, otherwise they get pushed into "I don't even need to consider you because you'll do what I say" position.

19
GhostBond 19 points ago +19 / -0

So wrong, it's actually right again.

Yes it is white people. Mostly white women, who's desire to fetishize black people on their facebook feed always somehow results in always hurting the people they claim to be helping.

-1
GhostBond -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't understand what he is bitching about. Like why did he have to publicly announce some random restaurant was not treating him well?

This is like the epitome of conservatives in congress. Dems push bills directly targeting men and conservatives, conservative politicians just go "no biggie we'll complain a bit then pass it anyways".

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›