You, yeah you, are the problem
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Interesting thoughts...
It's because of how colors, the eyes, and the brain work -
Look at this picture for example -
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMWQ3NDUwYmMtYzZlNy00YzU3LTkyYTktNDM3YTBiNzJiYWYyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzQxMDc5MzE@.V1.jpg
What race would you describe her as? Black. But if you broke it down, you might say she's 70% white and 30% black.
People aren't categorizing people into non-white because of some "racial purity" concepts (well the average people aren't) it's based on it's effect on visual appearance.
Cardboard
Because that's the color she actually is.
And I get that people break it down by visual appearance, but that's actually my point, 100 years ago, they would have called her: Mulatto. She would be "Colored" but she wouldn't be "Black".
Black has been redefined to basically include people who barely have any African ancestry in them. Black isn't being used racially or genetically by large parts of the Left at this point. It's being used politically. People are politically black, not racially black.
For example, Barack Obama isn't the US's first black president. He's the first Mulatto one.
Just so we're clear. The British media genuinely said that Megan Markle was being racially discriminated against because she was a Person Of Color, and on a rare occasion, I did hear them refer to the Crown's anti-black racism, to insinuate that she was black. This is Megan Markle