But this isn't the goal. If all you're doing is asking women for their phone number when you're out at a bar, that's pointless. I'm saying get the commitment from her first, otherwise the number is worthless.
Women are a worse pursuit than video games. I actually stopped playing video games for 5 whole years to "put myself out there more" in my late twenties and I found it was entirely a waste. Just balance things better. If your buddy invites you out, actually go out, don't say no. Take time to do things etc...
Also, getting women's phone numbers is pointless these days. Instead of asking women for a phone number you should be asking to come over to your place sometime and then if they agree, you get their phone number. Don't go on dates with women, just bring them straight over to your place.
Well, all men like sexualized women. A woman who isn't sexualized is worthless to men so if the woman is drawn to be as men like she's going to be sexualized.
This is great. I hope it links to onlyfans and twitter for the facial recognition.
Traditional Porn: Female actors get paid peanuts to engage in physical sex. Porn producers (mostly men) get paid lots of money. Male consumers get porn for free or if they are willing to pay for it, usually at reasonably cheap prices more-or-less.
This creates a difficult issue for women and why women are so split on the issue. Female workers are getting paid, but men are benefiting more from the work women are doing than women since the producers are men and the consumers are men who are getting a cheap product.
Onlyfans: Female actors get paid lots of money to engage in virtual sex. Male consumers get porn for an absurd price.
This is why women are generally all in agreement that onlyfans are good. Men are getting a pitiful product while women reap high rewards.
Sexualization of women in video games: Male consumers get what they want at no additional cost because the video game was going to cost the same regardless. Since men are getting what they want from the video game, this reduces the demand for things like porn and onlyfans; therefore, it's a net loss for women as a whole and women are gaining nothing from it. It's in women's interests to attack sexualized video game women at all costs.
If you look at it from the perspective that women only care about what benefits women and women hate what benefits men, it begins to make more sense.
Ask yourself. Are men benefiting more than women? If the answer is yes, then women don't like it. Ask yourself, are women benefiting more than men? If the answer is yes then women are fine with it.
You'd be surprised how good companies like this are at lying to shareholders and how dumb shareholders are. A friend of mine used to work in shareholder relations for a company and you basically just make up bullshit and lie nonstop... And shareholders believe you.
The allegations against him are going to be bogus. These women volunteer and consent for this type of stuff. Don't believe the simps and soysociety. The women are not victims.
It's sad he's considered a good role model because he is a con artist, as everyone can tell. He has money and he speaks the truth about women though. The way he earned his money insulates him from soyciety. Most men who are honest and hard-working, cannot speak the truth about women or they will lose their livelihood, that's how gynocratic we've become.
Not just prevent the splintering bit Azov was designed to help create anti-Russian sentiment. I've been on Azov propaganda telegrams, which by the way, have a huge feel like they're being run by the CIA. They always suggest Russia is Zionist Jews and Putin is a Muslim lover communist that hates white people and wants to reestablish the USSR. I definitely think this form of propaganda helped to radicalize Ukrianians against Russia not just prevent a splint to Russia.
I don't understand the need for people to suggest every bad person is a Jew. All this does it set yourself up for the situation where a bad person actually isn't a Jew and then what? That disproves your entire theory that the Jews are behind all the evil in the world? Not every bad person needs to be a Jew for the theory that Jews are responsible for much of the evil in the modern world to hold so I don't understand the obsession people have with trying to prove how ALL bad people are Jews.
Simonsen can also be a non-Jewish name. Not all Simonsen's are Jewish. Whether she's Jewish or not changes absolutely nothing about what she represents.
Laws are designed to maximize justice
Hahaha. Good one.
This is why I'm not opposed to honor killings. I think Islam has the right idea. If your son or daughter decides to go trans, you should be able to honor kill them before they kill you.
I agree, he likely wouldn't have been convicted but what do you think even the charge of such does to a nerdy professional guy. How will his family see him, anyone else who does? I mean, it was in the newspapers about his arrest and charge etc... The guy probably felt his life was ruined. Most people I talk to agree he likely would have won and maybe got some minor charges regarding paying for sex and potentially paying for sex with a minor (potentially) but even those charges in his profession would have meant bye-bye to his career etc... From his perspective, his life was over.
I think you underestimate how fair the justice system is. Even if he sufficiently proves it was all the girl's idea, the fact he had money on him, she was in the hotel room with him means he likely would be automatically convicted with paying to have sex with a minor even if no sex happened. The laws are not actually as fair as you think they are. They're designed to make convictions easy not for justice.
Lots of Tate topics but I thought I'd share a story of a coworker I worked with who committed suicide after being accused of human trafficking.
He met a girl on some sugar baby website. The girl offered sex for money. He agreed. The guy was some 30yo professional making $200k/yr+ and of course, like all men, had issues with dating/women so whores were a better option for him.
One day he met up with the girl to fuck at a hotel and the girl asked if he'd be willing to pay more if she brought a friend. It's extremely common for working girls to pair up with other girls and do this very thing to make more money. He agreed. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to him, the second girl was 16yo and was in fact being trafficked by the woman. The hotel staff suspected something when the two girls arrived at the hotel and called the cops. The cops came and bused him and the girls. They already had a file on the woman but the woman made a statement that blamed this guy for everything. Completely made it up about him pressuring her, asking her to find younger girls for him etc... 100% lies but she felt that was her best way to get out of it.
He was charged with human trafficking. I guess the shame got to him though and he jumped off the skyscraper he worked at. What's interesting is whenever I tell women this story, they still think the guy is a terrible person. He's really just some nerdy professional guy that wanted to have sex with hot women, that's all. Can't fault a man for wanting this, it's literally what all men want. I guess women just hate it when men get what they want, like Andrew Tate.
Hi there pretty girl. Want to sell sex for money? Okay daddy. HUMAN TRACIFFKING!!!! GET HIM HIM EGT WIUHSDAFJKFKJHKSADJH ABTIASHJKAS
It's worse than that as well. A country that legalizes prostitution would have a higher GDP than a country that does not holding all else constant. A country that has women stay home to cook for men and care for children would have a lower GDP than a country that employed women to care for children and cook for families despite people's quality of life likely better in the former scenario. GDP is a terrible indicator of Quality of Life which is why even "leftists" realized this and started promoting concepts like the "Human Development Index" but this itself is also terribly flawed because it has a huge leftist bias on what "Quality of Life" truly is.
At the end of the day, GDP honestly tells us nothing useful about a society.
Correct take.
That's a start.
I've said this before and I'll say this again. You should instead make a list of all companies that are outwardly male chauvinistic. Then we should only support those companies.
My default view in this society is that all companies are gynocratic unless they expressively state otherwise.
Universal healthcare works. All you do is create death panels who decide which people get to receive healthcare and which people get to die, like Canada. Basically, you set a budget and then apply healthcare according to the budget. In this way, it's always sustainable. Sure, lots of people might not get healthcare or the service and quality might be very bad but that's besides the point. The point is whether it's sustainable or not and that's easily accomplished.
Start-ups always had access to talent. Start-ups could never afford talent. Now start-ups can afford talent. That is all.
Who knew hiring a bunch of leftist faggots with 0 imagination beyond their sexual identity would be terrible for business.
How about both?
As long as I'm doing the raping, still sounds based. Jokes aside... I'm joking. No, really... Anyway, why does it devolve into rape?
Like once every few months. I can't say exact numbers. Maybe like 1/15? But I also was being selective on the 15, I wouldn't do this to anyone.. and you don't start off with that. You chat a while, get to know them, drink, etc... The point I'm trying to make is get the commitment from her first. Phone numbers are worthless on their own. Women hand them out like crazy.