Thats a great point. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Someone hires some jeet.
IF you leave them alone, you get what you wrote about above. Wasted, time, effort, man-hours, etc... and when you confront it, you know racism will be the order of the day..
IF however you watch and manage them right from the get go.. they'll claim you're doing that because your racist, and the only thing saved is the time, effort and man-hours before they fire you and give the jeet your job.
Why would they listen? The entire point of them having their own country was for them to stop mucking around and causing shit within everyone elses...
Which only resulted in them having a base of operations by which to muck with everyone elses' country's.
The finger pointing that its really the muslims doing the damage(while not entirely wrong, isn't entirely correct either) and even where that is correct, the muslims in all these country's are there thanks to the migration pushing from Israel/Jews to push them into European cities to destroy them...
So there is that...
Yep, for years all of Canada watched both sides of the isle lock them down, force medical injections on them, force the elderly to die alone, etc....
Then, watched 98+% of Canadians vote for 1 of the 3 party's that did all that to them... because if they don't vote them X(which were OK with a, b, and c being done) we'd end up with Y(Which was ok with a, b, and c done)...
Vote for the Liberals? Get globalism. Vote for the CPC? Get globalism. Vote for the NDP? Get globalism.
Until Canadians can see through that illusion, its pointless.
Canada Deserves Better.
Yep, its like when you suspect someone of stealing something and stashing it in the shed. They refuse to open the shed, but will do a giant song and dance on why he didn't steal anything, instead of opening a door.... is generally really good evidence(if not proof positive) of the accusation.
The most important lesson from history...
is that people don't learn from history.
And
Those that don't learn history are doomed to repeat it, but also, those that learn history are also doomed to repeat it due to all those that refuse to learn history.
99.9% of the people out there irl, aren't in conversations. They're politely waiting for their turn to talk about themselves. The connective tissue between all the individuals talking about themselves is whatever the current talking-point is.
Or as guy richie put it years ago...
Being a good person, is completely beside the point. Why are you calling someone a traitor, when there is simply no such evidence.
Whether the list exists or not, is also irrelevant. By pushing it to the forefront Massie is aiding those children, and those in the pipeline and those yet to be in it. Surely that is enough to cheer the guy.
Isn't it? One this one issue? Yes/No?
Shouldn't we all want that list released? Regardless who is releasing it?
Does our love for saving kids and holding those accountable, not matter as much as the need for ideological purity?
From my perspective - I'm done with the partisan games. IDGAF who releases it, just f'n well do it FFS.
Also - Saw a post where it looks like the Senate blocked the release of the list, shortly after the shot at Kirk..So yeah..
And who will do that? Also, it was Harper that signed us all up for the UN crap, that all this is the result of...
2 sides, of the same coin. The CPC are the Liberals, and the Liberals are the CPC.
They have worked in tandem to destroy Canada for their globalist masters.
That was the goal - it is pure entrapment, and has no basis in actual law.
The "legal" system has been corrupted, and we all know it, its being directed and targeted based not on actions, but on who/what the person is. That isn't the law, and those promoting it need to be really sat down and spoken to about the reasons why Law has to be blind, or else it simply isn't the Law.
You're missing the point - You're talking about what 'they' consider to be legal. Not what is just, or within the basis of actual law.
Its the UK female cops wearing short skirts, and then arresting the people that comment on it. Same thing.
Sure it might be 'legal' in the sense that it those with the guns will enforce that - but there is no basis of actual "Law" there, because it treats people differently based on who/what they are.
Unless the law is blind, it isn't the law. We all know this to be true.
The MAIN difference is there is none. Change it to going into the forest after hunting season if it unbinds your panties... The point is there, and all see it. Different application of the law, depending on the occupation of the doer. Right? Thats what it boils down to doesn't it?
I didn't say you were a Boot licking NPC, I said it was clearly and obviously the same thing to anyone other than one.. Of course, claiming its different when they do it, and that its OK cause its legal when they do it - isn't a strong point., but I don't know you well enough to say that about you - I have read your post, and can say that about your post though.
My argument is simply this - from first principles.
Any real basis for a "Law" has to be equally applied to everyone. When it isn't, it isn't really a law. So simple.
Are you really willing to say that Law gets to be applied differently, to different people, depending on the uniform they wear? Their occupation?
Surely not - its an affront against every single notion of a just legal system. Right?
So trust the experts? Lots of idiocy is long running..
Where is the difference?
Police dress up like something they aren't. I dress up as something I am not.
Police go where they can be confused with something else. I go where I can be confused with something else.
They charge the person that fell for their ruse. I try and charge the person that fell for the ruse.
The only difference is that its "legal" when they do it, and it shouldn't take anyone(That isn't a boot licking, NPC) to understand that is, was and never can be the basis for a legitimate law.
100%... neither side is trustworthy... I am sure there is a tidbit of truth in both sides accusations. How much, and where it is - I care not. As I have said, as you have said, as most people in the West now are at least thinking ....
Fuck them both. Let them both kill each other over there. Out job is to just deport all of them back to their respective shitholes.
Counter point...
If I dress up like a bear, and then go roaming into the bear-hunting forest, and when the inevitable shot comes - me trying to charge the shooter with attempted murder.. Never, ever, ever would fly for obvious reasons.
I get what you're saying about the law - but it is still entrapment when the cops do it. The law doesn't think so, as if the law was consistent 9/10ths of the laws wouldn't be there, and then where would their cash cow come from?
the truth and reconciliation board acted like they were going to find the truth, but they seemed more interested in burying it and pretending like it never happened.
- Close, they promised to look into it with great fanfare and aplause... but then, found little, if any real mistreatment, and none that was exclusive to natives. That is, they were mistreated, but so was everyone else - and thus, not politically viable...
No one is saying the past didn't do bad shit - its that it wasn't exclusive to any 1 group.
Thats their goal.
Interesting thought though - since that space is effectively advertising, and advertising space is hugely expensive for any spot, let alone on the endzone of an NFL field...
Who is paying for this? I am sure the teams owners aren't taking the cut, nor is the teams, nor are the players....
Who is giving the NFL $(Or threatening the $) to make them do this?
I want to nose.
But isn't that the thing? Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't America supposed to prioritise the minority?
Just the ultimate minority - the individual?
The issue, IMO, is that America went from that, to framing everything as some group conflict.
The thing is, without gov. programs the situation sorts itself out.
The baby momma's watch their kids starve to death, and eventually they or in reality those that are watching them learn to make better choices.
But instead the gov. says "Nope, can't have that!, Here is some $ we forcibly took from others. Now vote for us!" And they do..
Its so insidious how the system rewards bad behaviour, paid for by those that did the right thing, under the guise of caring. All for votes.
Its a huge weakness in the voting system, when everyone gets the same 1 vote(even if there was no corruption, which there clearly is).
Great documentary out there called "The Power of Nightmares" speaks on this concept.
As I've said for decades now, if it was happening in another country we'd see it for what it was.
If some 'bad place' took children from their parents before they could reason. Placed them in a government run building for "education" and for 7hrs a day, 5 days a week, ~45 weeks every year, for their entire mental developmental period there they remained under the gov. thumb for 'education'..
And at the end of it, they could barely read, write or do basic arithmetic but DID know all 274354 genders, could shout one-sided political slogans, and had a near 100% political pov uniformity...
We'd all see it as the indoctrination center it is.