A pair of three kingdom period pieces dominate my list:
I reincarnated as a legendary surgeon is a slice of life Isekai into the time just prior to the three kingdoms period in China.
Whereas Three Kingdom's: Lu Bu's legacy, takes Lu Bu, gives him the knowledge of his life as he lived it, and sets him loose in his own past with the idea that he needs to change to better the future.
And then there's The Boundless Necromancer, which is a pulpy Korean Webnovel which updated so slowly I became frustrated enough write my own novel whilst waiting for it to update.
My money's on a youtube style automated mass-report system, with manual override/error-checking that is still manned by foreign/woke support staff.
Even if the staffing issues are addressed by firings, what you're left with is a weaponized system with no controls on it, instead of one with leftist controls.
I have found that the more the world goes to hell, the more it matters keeping my space in order, creating the order I can in my immediate environment. Tending the plant on my desk or adding words to a manuscript is orders of magnitude better for me than anything I can learn by examining the scope of the decline of the West.
Tend your garden. Care for yourself. The world can burn (or not) very well on its own.
This youtube comment sums up what I think is happening.
Basically, a lot of third rate comics publishers are IP farms run on borrowed money, looking to score the next big Hollywood option. It's a scam, where the organizers draw a salary for a few years while hoping to strike gold on owning the next Squid Game.
If they fail, bankruptcy follows. But none of the money was theirs, so they walk away. Only creators and investors get left holding the bag. If not, ca-ching! Jackpot! The investors and the creatives are all hopelessly converged, so I watch them fucking each other over in the bottom of the crab pot with glee anyway.
They might even dig them up to make a political point.
Confederates, then Jefferson & Washington, then even the non-slave holding founders as 'complicit.'
Ideally, the losses are large enough and obvious enough that the shareholders, who are only interested in profit, sue the ever living shit out of the ESG-tainted boards, shutting this grift down.
I believe Disney faces just such a suit. Ideally, the large stakeholders will sue over the use of their investment/capital to subsidize ESG's ends. As long as they can prove damages/money lost, godspeed.
No-- she don't know. That's the funny part!