1
DivvyDivet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah due to military service I have the smallpox and anthrax vaccine. Looking forward to dying young.

6
DivvyDivet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pretty much all pox are in the same viral family. And that includes herpes.

by folx
16
DivvyDivet 16 points ago +16 / -0

I bet that drag show had more armed guards than any elementary school.

19
DivvyDivet 19 points ago +19 / -0

Cave Johnson here. I don't care if you're L,G,B,T or one of those plus people. We need test subjects to try out our new laser repellant armor. For those of you who survive you will be rewarded handsomely. (What's that Caroline? The budget can't afford to pay them? Well no one's made it through the test yet.)

4
DivvyDivet 4 points ago +5 / -1

In NC you can beat them on the court steps legally on Sunday.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +3 / -0

-Hitler drinks water and like genocide.

-You drink water therefore you like genocide.

Dumbass people using dumbass logic.

1
DivvyDivet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Linux with Wine for when you need windows comparability.

But really the answer is Android which is just user friendly Linux.

12
DivvyDivet 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm celebrating Kwanza just like they did in 1965.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +3 / -0

I identify as a woman. Promote me biggot.

23
DivvyDivet 23 points ago +24 / -1

6 day old account with nothing but racist troll posts.

Glow harder FBI.

7
DivvyDivet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your post is 8 hours old. Guess the park is already gone.

4
DivvyDivet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just change it to penis or no penis prisons /bathrooms/ ect. Piss the left off and give them no room to pretend they are something they are not.

17
DivvyDivet 17 points ago +17 / -0

Lol our military has been cucked since the 2004 "it's ok to not be ok" bullshit.

2
DivvyDivet 2 points ago +2 / -0

The generation of new traits is random

No it's not. Traits are passed from the set the parents can provide and the traits most likely to survive to be passed on are the ones that fit best for reproduction of the species. And this isn't always bigger and stronger traits. For example Peacocks select for longer tails and bright colors. This is actually a disadvantage to the males when fleeing predators. That isn't random. The same occurs with deer being selected by females for large sets of horns. Again another disadvantage as smaller horns require less energy and have less weight but still provide protection. Human females select for larger penises. Sorry it's true. They also select for taller men. Which is why our species is getting taller year over year. Again not random.

And again the theory of evolution makes no assertion to it being random. So if you want to make the claim that evolution is random then first prove that it is random and then prove the math formula you keep alluding too but never actually produced.

A finch in a seed-scarce environment isn't going to spontaneously evolve the ability to digest insects just because it would be evolutionarily advantageous to do so - spontaneous mutation resulting in greater fitness could, but again the odds against that are astronomical. The only framework in which that could happen is intelligent design, not evolution.

Neither the theory of evolution nor I make this claim. So I don't get why you brought this up other than to make a strawman argument.

Again you seem to be arguing against the theory of evolution without actually knowing what it is, even though I gave a synopsis of it. You're again being disengenuius and ignoring facts.

1
DivvyDivet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I feel like we’re beating a dead horse on this though.

This is what happens when definitions aren't defined before a debate. If we don't agree on a definition then everything else is just talking past the person.

1
DivvyDivet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Homosexuality in humans is exclusive, to the point of revulsion towards the idea of sex with the opposite sex in some cases.

I never said that is what homosexuality is or gave it as a definition. Homosexuality is the act of two of the same sex having sex. If you or the other person want to use that definition then ok but most animals don't form bonds so you might as well say they aren't heterosexual if the exclusive part is that important.

0
DivvyDivet 0 points ago +1 / -1

By your logic it’s possible to argue anything is possible given enough time and random chance.

No I actually haven't made that assertion or alluded to it at all.

Even if that we’re true, the problem in this case is there isn’t enough time to accomplish everything evolution demands.

By what metric? What standard? And where does the theory of evolution make such a claim? You keep making this assertion with nothing to back it up.

You saying “but it happened” is just assuming the conclusion.

It happened and I pointed out where you can find evidence of how and why it happened over multiple fields of study.

The evidence for evolution is nowhere near as strong as you were led to believe

You're ignoring tangible facts and imperical evidence making this claim.

and there are all sorts of problems with it that were glossed over and ignored for decades because academia hated Christianity and wanted desperately to distance itself from it.

Then point out the problems so they can be discussed. The issues you've brought up so far I've given examples of evidence that points to you being absolutely wrong.

As a theory it may still have legs, but there are some glaring issues that just seem to just get worse the more we examine them, so at very least it’s incomplete.

You're using the word theory in the scientific definition when it fits your need and changing it to the colloquial version to also fit your need. It's not both. You're being disengenuius by doing this. Especially after I pointed it out. The fact that you still are doing it makes me believe you have no interest in an honest discussion.

You’ll get your head taken off by academics, anti-theists and secularists if you even suggest such a thing though, as it’s taken on an almost religious importance in that community.

Nah this is bunk. The fact is there is mountains of evidence for evolution and you clearly don't want to look into any of it. I've provided examples that you just ignore completely. You're going to need more than baseless assertions to make a claim such as evolution isn't real. Your argument thus far makes it seem that you don't even know what the theory of evolution asserts to be the explanation.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +4 / -1

You should read on genetics and how traits are passed from one generation to another. No one who is actually educated on the subject calls it random because it's not.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +4 / -1

For some reason you seem to be focused on exclusively which isn't relevant. Chimps have homesexual sex for fun all the time. It's not rape, it's not forced. They just do it. Dogs fuck each other regularly as well. And parrots will form homesexual bonds that are exclusive and can last a lifetime. So again what you're saying isn't true.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +4 / -1

Tell me the suggested rate of stable mutation for a species jump to occur.

That's not what the theory of evolution says so again it doesn't make sense as a refutation. It's not my job to make your argument

view more: Next ›