Today on national geographic we explore the antisemitic island off the coast of Indonesia where all the parrots say kike nonstop. Rumor has it a Nazi sex tourist taught all the birds to say Kike but the Jewish Defense League of Indonesia has been unable to confirm an identity. Local jews say what has transpired on the island is equivalent to a second holocaust and they have began demanding reparations from Germany. The German government, sympathetic to their cause, has increased funding to Jewish groups in Indonesia. Today, we bring you on the island but due to sensitive nature of the speech, we have to ommit any of the parrots parroting the word kike.
More like AI did this and was promoted by a jew.
It's also because they've been primed by mainstream media to think gas prices are a major issue they should care about and you're just repeating a mainstream media accepted narrative.
Yeah, that's actually what it says.
"Well actually, the Rbbi was just making an argument to better refine the rule. The takeaway from the script though is thet the group of Rabbis concluded his argument was wrong"
Although, I've read the full chapter of the Talmud that gets referenced by people saying it says raping 2 years is okay and that is not what it's saying. It's saying that if someone rapes a 2 year old girl she isn't considered a non-virgin. This is relevant for purposes of marriage. The passage is actually an early feminist passage because it was protecting the sanctity of young girls despite what atrocities were committed against them. I don't like defending jews but using that passage to try and harm jews does really just make goys look stupid.
It's pretty obvious to me the current Pope is jewish. His parents, who were accountants, escaped Nazis... Uh huh... And he's an adamant communist. Also, he looks like one. If it walk, talks... Etc... obviously a jew to me.
While this is funny and definitely proves a point, it's hyperbole. What I posted is literally happening so I think it's better to convey the message than the shit eating joke.
Economics in terms of how it measures output is incredibly flawed.
Based on my analysis of the Roman Republic/Empire, the country will cease to be anything like it once was at about 10-15% of the original race but it starts to get really bad after 40%. Unfortunately, the time between 40% to 15% takes longer than from 70% to 40% and the country can still function by riding off the success that it once had for hundreds of years.
Those who think a collapse is on its way are mistaken. You will be replaced and life will go on. It will be worse than it was before but rich rulers won't care. And from the perspective of those who replaced you, it'll still be better for them.
However, there's some modern issues such as the welfare state and modern finance. Could prove to be a couple chaotic elements.
Exactly. I was trying to get at that point but you explained it better!
Even though the exact same thing happened, GDP in one scenario is double GDP in the other. That means GDP is 100% worthless.
While it's "never free", my comment is accurate assuming it's free.
I propose a radical shift in measure of economic output.
GDP (PPP adjusted) multiplied by the square root of the median number of times per year that a working aged man has had sex with a woman equal to or lesser than his BMI score without paying for it.
Now, I know you're thinking this is irrelevant but in actuality I think we'd see a significant alignment with regards to the QUALITY of economic output when said median is higher but having a higher number will likely reduce absolute value of GDP (hence why you need to multiply it). The overall metric with the multiplication will be a much better measure of economic output to cross compare between countries.
Meanwhile, if a woman has sex with a man for free and that man saves his $500, the GDP output would be 50% less at $500.
By having women charge the man for sex then spend it instead of providing sex for free, it says economic output doubled yet in reality the man is worse off $500 and the woman is better off $500 but GDP is double.
Meanwhile, everyone in society is better off if the women are providing sex for free.
Alright, so I had AI run through it I've noticed a pattern.
AI (taking the jewish side obviously) says this person's take is a misinterpretation. What it says is that Shahak was criticizing old Judaism for harboring similar beliefs and that new Judaism needs to do away with it. He says in the Talmud, Rabbis mention it as a discussion but it's not how the laws in practice developed. Then in the Zohar it was actually a spiritual metaphor and doesn't translate into reality.
I'm realizing that this is how jews communicate. They take both sides so they can claim either side as it is convenient to them. They do this in politics and in everything. It's highly deceptive and difficult for normies to understand.
They say both hi and bye then pick whichever ends up better for them for the circumstance, arguing the other was a hypothetical possibility but not real so-to-speak.
Where AI is helpful.
Here is a plain-English breakdown of the ideas presented in that passage:
God’s nature is freedom: The author plays with the roots of the word "promise" to argue that God’s way is to constantly move things forward and grant freedom or "release."
Control is the opposite of God's way: The author then plays with the roots of the word "control" to describe the opposite of freedom. The passage relies on an antisemitic trope, claiming that a small Jewish minority suppresses or "detains" the non-Jewish majority (Gentiles).
Power requires consent: The text argues that those in power cannot actually control anyone unless the masses voluntarily surrender their ability to choose.
People are limiting themselves: Ultimately, the author claims that "control" is just an illusion. They argue that the larger population is actually maintaining its own subjugation by choosing to believe they are controlled, rather than recognizing their own individuality and exercising their God-given free will.
In short, the passage argues that people are willingly giving up their God-given freedom by believing in the illusion that a small elite controls them.
My point: if I don't pay taxes, I get forced to be a government that has men with guns that force me to do things. If I do what I want to do, I land in prison. I can claim to be free all I want but reality is much different than spirituality which only exists in one's head.
Who knows. Maybe Microsoft wants to sell their stake in the company at a profit and they pushed for this. Could be anything really but it seems stupid to get rid of this unless they were fixing up their income statement or future balance sheet.
I think he will fuck it up but in a subtle way which is worse. He's basically perfectly suited to subvert LOTR in a manner normies might not catch. So, the film might actually be highly successful and "good" but he'll slightly twist the message around to have an underlying woke message that only people like us will catch onto.
OpenAI is preparing for an IPO and I suspect the video generation aspect of its business is highly costly with little gain (anticipated) so they're axing it to improve their financial statements for their IPO.
Yeah, that's another problem. But the reformed slut who isn't a sexual being anymore is common too. Lack of commitment is a problem for all women, even virgins.
I don't see anything wrong with a virgin guy marrying an ex whore.
The issue for me comes down to how she treats him. The problem I have with women who are ex whores is that they often treat the men they're with in their ex whore phase significantly worse than the way they treated the men when she was a whore. This is insulting but it's extremely common.
When men fuck a thousand women then marry a marry they treat that woman better than the women they fucked before.
Ex-whores though often give their husband a once a month mercy fuck where she's a starfish and he finishes in 5 minutes after doing all the work himself. But when she was a whore she'd be sucking the guys dick for hours, fucking all night long and begging for the guy to fill her up. If she treats her new husband as well as she treated her best fuck from her white days then all the power to her but I know from experience that's rarely the case.
These "reformed slut" women had all their fun when they were young and attractive with peice of shit men, then they switched into resource acquisition mode and are now longer fun for their new nice guy husband after they became an ex whore. It's downright insulting, manipulative and evil.
Be a whore and marry a virgin all you want but treat your significant other better than any of the men in your past you'd ever been with. That's all I ask and care about.
Hmm but you don't know where it describes it? Damn it... I wanted to read it.
Was Vlad the Impaler a jew? Your concept of nice was ingrained in your head by jews specifically to declaw you and make you a good cattle goy.
Nice is not a virtue. Women understand this. Hopefully, you eventually understand this too before it's too late.
Hopefully, the robots have a built in self defense trigger that curb stomps non-Whites.
Thicc was never hot. It was just cause they wanted us to like fat women since most non-Whites (blacks esp) are fat.
Israel appears to be the only country that knows how to conduct a war these days. Yes, they use White people to do their bidding for them but White people happily oblige and Israel gets what they want. When White people or anyone else conducts wars, we sit on are hands doing fuck all. Israel gets straight to business. Genocide the habitants, annex the territority, set up your own settlements. Simple. The same tried tested and true method of war since the dawn of time.
Voldemort was the good guy in Harry Potter. The unforgivable hexes were fine and even Harry Potter realizes it by the end such that he started casting a couple. I doubt blacks on average would be able to cast the unforgivable curses because of the skill involved in them. Most wizards were incapable of casting them. It's estimated that only 5% of the wizarding world could cast them, that means pretty much 100% of blacks would be unable to cast them.
No, 13% of wizards would be responsible for 52% of crimes but they wouldn't involve the unforgivable hexes. Only the Nazis of the wizarding world were mostly capable of them becsuse if their superior genetics.