Why GDP is a worthless measure of economic output
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Meanwhile, if a woman has sex with a man for free and that man saves his $500, the GDP output would be 50% less at $500.
By having women charge the man for sex then spend it instead of providing sex for free, it says economic output doubled yet in reality the man is worse off $500 and the woman is better off $500 but GDP is double.
Meanwhile, everyone in society is better off if the women are providing sex for free.
It's never free unless you're a top 10 percenter, and it's only free for them because they're being subsidized by betas. The problem is the people paying aren't the ones getting the benefits. It's not all that dissimilar to feminists dumping all the responsibilities in modern relationshits on men while stripping them of the authority to carry out those responsibilities.
While it's "never free", my comment is accurate assuming it's free.