Yeah they've been taught to think of Trump as one of the worst humans alive. You could get a rapist or murderer to run against him and they wouldn't change their minds.
The goal is to reach more reasonable people and tap into their sympathies and rationality instead.
Also, associating Biden and Harris with the confederate flag is an insult to the confederacy not the other way around.
"The Right" tends to be classified as such because they see value in preserving things that came before them. That there might be some merit to keeping things as they are and changing things slowly over time. Instead of focusing on how things should be changing, they focus on slowing down the process or even reversing it.
"The Left" focuses on pushing things in the direction they want, and will tear down anything in order to do so. And as they say, those who control the future control the past.
In the past it was the Church who was the arbiter of truth and the ultimate authority of the nature of the world. Now we have science for that, however instead of it being clear the science is "too difficult for any normal person to understand" so you must simply believe what people with 'authority' say. Since everybody is a specialist you simply need to take people at their word or you're spending 20+ hours every time learning just how exactly they're bending the truth.
Any doubt will be shouted at with "It's proven!!!" and "Educate yourself" rather than giving an actual sensible explanation. It's a house of cards that's going to fall eventually once one persons lies or false research becomes too large to defend.
Yeah it's definitely trying to conflate reality and fiction at least. The one thing with Cuties is that they're actually getting young girls to dress up in slutty outfits and do sexual dance moves. It's not something they "pretended to do" it's what they actually did.
I recently read this post of the dancing israelis who supposedly planned ahead to watch and celebrated the towers falling. I don't know the full veracity of it, but the CIA investigated it and recently released info due to FOIA request.
Dictator does not immediately mean totalitarian, you made that assumption yourself. It simply means full control, the one who dictates. That does not mean that they will dictate everything, only what they see as necessary.
The way I see it is that individual rulers are good for drastic change, when change is needed. And democracies and other bureaucracies are good at preventing change, when change is not needed.
The important question is "Do we need change now?" and change is not always good, so in order to get good change you must have good people in power.
Why not? In a family is a father not the dictator. Or would you rather have families ruled by democracy.
I genuinely want to know, because the "hatred of dictators" is one thing many people have been programmed with, myself included.
Asians put a large emphasis on intellectual honor. This isn't always being smart, but being known as smart. This means you need to put in enough effort to at least look smart or get good credentials.
Blacks put much more emphasis on physical honor. This means wanting to look strong. And being smart often can make you look physically weak, so that's not something they tend to pursue.
Whites I'm not quite as sure about, but I would say the emphasis is on overall confidence. To be confident on a topic you need to know about something deeply, or at least pretend you do. And it's often just best to learn and study than pretend you know everything you need to.
That's the problem with pursuing "equality" eventually you'll find that one group is more effective than others. Even if you tip the scales against them they might be better on average than other groups. In that case, the only way to make them "equal" in outcome is handicapping their success.
Because "the right" isn't a singular group. Even on "the left" those who support communism are just the useful idiots for the international gangsters who want to run everything.
The first thing to know is that in our current society the people who have money have power. And even more than that, the people who print the money have the most power.
BotW has freedom of exploration unlike any other game to me. You can climb up a mountain, look off into the distance and go anywhere you want. That alone has incredible amounts of power to it. Even if the rest of the game is lacking in parts, that single element shining is enough to make me happy.
Mario Odyssey on the other hand claimed to be like 64 and Sunshine, but all I found was a hidden object hunt. No real exploration at all. It would have probably been better if it was just linear levels instead of the weak worlds they ended up making.
It's true. Games are a very important part of life, they are a safe "training ground" for people to hone their skills before they need to apply them seriously. In terms of sports they can act as competitions without violence, so people can still end up feeling victory and defeat. This is where the "games are just for kids" mindset comes from.
A person who's 20 years old and still riding a bike with training wheels is a failure.
That's why it's an insult for people to be saying "all video games should have an easy mode!" because they are basically saying "all bikes should have training wheels" which is nonsensical.
You can see people's obsession with young adult literature and superhero movies as similar symptoms of arrested development.
The people who didn't want diversity didn't get a choice. The traitors in their midst opened the gates and decried anybody objecting as evil. They knew full well that leaving the gates open would cause significant problems, that's what they wanted all along.
When it comes to games like Breath of the Wild I completely disagree, they took a large risk with that game. It was a Zelda game with no dungeons, and your weapons constantly broke, and it was still very fun. Not perfect, but very enjoyable.
When it comes to Mario though, they are becoming quite boring. I did not enjoy Mario Odyssey very much.
I'm pretty sure they got some of that Obama money after about 2010, or from some other "investor" because there's no way they would make anything close to what they've cost. Other than the value of indoctrination that is.
This is a recent article I found explaining some elements of early european peoples. Specifically focusing on the caste system of priests, warriors, and producers. I found it very informative and suggest anybody else interested in history to read it too.
That's only part of it, the US dollar has been subject to an "ideal" amount of 2% inflation per year. That's what the federal reserve wants to happen. Just look at the US inflation calculator. $60 in the year 2000 is equivalent to $90 in 2020.
Of course this BBC article is filled with "horrible Russians avoiding sanctions!" it also says:
HSBC allowed fraudsters to move millions of dollars of stolen money around the world, even after it learned from US investigators the scheme was a scam.
JP Morgan allowed a company to move more than $1bn through a London account without knowing who owned it. The bank later discovered the company might be owned by a mobster on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list.
The UK is called a "higher risk jurisdiction" like Cyprus, according to the intelligence division of FinCEN. That's because of the number of UK registered companies that appear in the SARs. Over 3,000 UK companies are named in the FinCEN files - more than any other country.