Because at the moment, my people won't even hear an ill word about women despite whatever I say.
This gains the result of abusing Islam's untouchable place in society to return men's own spaces to them, allowing them to grow into men again, and have the self-respect and strength to remove barbarians and resist women like they also once did.
Whereas the alternative is we deport the shitskins, women still have the ability to vote and emasculate men throughout their life, and then they cry cry cry and borders get opened again because "choose kindness!" level emotional manipulation from them.
I've got 3 kids and a wife who works fulltime with me and magically our house and children survive just fine with doing most of those once a week or a month total.
The only one even close to the correct value is the daily lunch budget, simple because that's a great deal compared to having to buy your lunch instead every day.
The only value in monetizing necessary household tasks and chores is determining if it is more valuable to hire someone to do them for you and you continuing to work, usually a useful metric for people with decently paying jobs. Or maybe when determining a child's allowance.
If you need to audit your entire household budget and tasks constantly to figure out how to give "spending money" then you are living well below your means and should worry about that first rather than some convoluted system of chore value.
This sets expectations and prevents resentment and abuse from both sides.
This very article proves this wrong. This woman has massively overvalued herself and the value of the chore. If you and your wife are amicable and agreeable enough to set hardstone values on a task without major disagreement (compromise will lead to resentment), then you are a couple who doesn't need this entire nonsense.
If the dinner is shit do I dock her pay? If the baby is extra destructive today does she demand more for her cleaning? If I believe dusting isn't as important and she is abusing our finances by doing it daily, who is in the right?
Once money is involved, these little thoughts turn from minor disagreements with little value to incredibly important arguments about our finances. Now the couple has to squabble and argue constantly because every single aspect of their life is revolving around money and their time value, their home life is a second job.
Couldn't even bother to make the number add up to 100 I see.
I'm sure the fact that they either made up the number entirely, or just didn't bother to add in the third answer to frame it differently, makes this super trustworthy.
Well Islam is right about women and segregated spaces by gender improves literally everything about what those spaces are intended to do.
But they are also savages who can't be trusted to do anything right and will fuck up everything else.
Quite a hard pickle here.
I might be underinformed, but I'm fairly certain if you commit to a decent lifestyle change early enough you dodge getting the beetus or send it into remission. Its only the Type 1s that are fucked with needing forever meds and that's a from birth condition.
Like, when the wife got the gestational one, she just had to cut back on a few foods and then was able to get her levels low enough to never need the insulin shots a lot of pregnant women do.
That would honestly be motivating, because I've always wanted to go to space and that makes it achievable for me (not really because of cost, but money can come).
But it was a gaggle of women, so it had to be about "me me me."
Nobody replies to trannies if they know they’re trans.
I've seen enough degeneracy to know this isn't true. But its a specific subset of men who are chasing them because of what they are, for whatever gross reason they may have.
Which makes the trannies seethe. The only men that desire them do so out of fetishized acknowledgement of them being a gross abomination, like guys who like fat chicks.
The longer this entire thing goes on, the more and more it becomes obvious that people just cannot fathom the level of evil that that boy's father is.
Everyday they seem compelled to whitewash his actions as something something Christian or this or that. Anything to give him an excuse or to make him seem less awful.
When the reality of it is that the man is almost more evil than the monkey who killed his son. Because the negro is an animal with barely an impulse control, while the father is openly choosing to piss on his son's life and grave and enable said negro and all like him.
Kane and Lynch was a mediocre game that is only remembered for its controversy, otherwise it would be in the pile with all the other "Blockbuster rental" level shooters of its time. Had a great idea, didn't execute it well.
Not that Twilight Princess is a masterpiece, but its at least a solid 7 game compared to that one's 5.
That's the reason I'm also "off and on." I did it during the calmer years of my first two, and now with three I'm mostly off there myself. But I can see myself going back once my last one is in her teens and time is open again.
At least a few of the guys I met doing it were empty nesters in their 50s.
Its pretty fulfilling. Usually you'll end with up a kid who literally worships you as some idol, since their own father is usually incredibly lacking (which is why they end up there), so you are motivated to be the best version of yourself to be a good example for them.
While obviously just having a kid of your own is the best version of that for everyone, trying to improve your local community one life at a time still brings its own benefits.
I've spent a lot of years off and on volunteering with a local big brother equivalent.
Its always like 3 of us dudes (never any women), with 30+ kids looking for someone to pair with. All races, all mostly innocent kids in a bad situation with someone trying to make them have a better chance at life. And its just me and a few others usually pretty conservative or centrist dudes just trying to give our time.
The organization literally just asks for an hour a week from us (you can do more, but you have to do an hour to qualify for the tax benefit), a literal drop in the bucket, and not a single strongly Liberal person to show up and help these little Mexican or black kids not fall into gangs or drugs before they turn 12.
bibically inherently immoral
You needed a very specific definition to create this differentiation. There are more metrics to immorality than inherent or biblical evil.
Pedos don't inherently have to hurt children. But we know that will happen to such an overwhelming amount of time we don't need to split the hairs on it.
Heck, black people existing in a country doesn't have to inherently increase crime and violence, but it always does and most of our "race politics" debates rest on this fact. Its one of the reasons why that scene is so Progressive and Woke to this day.
If we're going to assess things by how big of a deal they were at the time, we could do that for a lot of stuff.
This is a foolish comparison. We are assessing it by both how big of a shakeup it was and the agenda that it is attempting to push. The interracial kiss was meant to be a statement reflecting the real world Civil Rights movement, which is why Shatner forcefully ruined every take to make sure it got on air, whereas a toilet flushing is not trying to make a message on Leftist Political positions.
Even if it did, its purely on a neutral action against censorship. We can squabble on the degeneration of American culture by allowing gross things on TV like that, but that's a whole much larger and less Left/Right definable discussion.
Is a white man kissing a black woman objectively immoral?
A white man giving in to his lust constantly with women to whom he is not married is objectively immoral thing regardless of who its with, based on "biblicaly inherently immoral" standards. Heck most times the bible refers to these acts it calls it "sexual immorality" specifically. This is your standard, so it fails before it even reaches the "black woman" part.
You've created a super specific metric to define things to defend a property you like from being criticized by the same standard you hold many other things to.
It was a Leftist political message shoved into a network television show to push a very controversial position onto the populace via media manipulation and social pressure. That makes it no different than the vast amount of gay and tranny stuff is right now, regardless of how you want to split the hair.
Its fine if you like Star Trek, heck its fine if you think the tarring of it goes too far in some ways. Literally everyone here has some Woke property we like anyway.
For every woke ideology playing Psyop games there is a retard who is thinking this will somehow make him money or connections, or is an improvement in some way.
If it wasn't the case, there wouldn't be even a slight pendulum swing back once the "infinite money" from Blackrock and ESG ended.
Yeah, it was a great "any retard can now go to space with enough money!" is hugely important as a step forward for both tech but also humanity. No longer was space this unapproachable frontier for only the most niche capable humans.
But to say it that way calls these women retards outloud and their ego wouldn't like that, so they had to pretend it was some girlboss shit.
and the interacial kiss.
This, for that time, is like the modern equivalent level of having an explicit tranny sex scene with stickditch visible on screen on network television for your children to be watching with you. You see it as "just a thing" that happened that can be handwaved this easily because you are looking at it from a modern lens where such a thing is so blase.
If our modern discourse on "Woke/Progressive" was around back then this would be decried as "woke shit, complete garbage, irredeemable slop" on this alone. Instead its being judged on a scale where you can give every element a fair shake and then compare it to decide its totally not because X outweighs Y.
Like, you could do this for most of the Woke media we laugh at here. Compartmentalize the wokest part as "that thing that happened" and then write about the other elements that are more generalized at length, making it seem like its not really that woke at all actually! Its just a black guy in Japan, its just a girlboss, its only one tranny character.
If you like the series regardless, that's fine. Everyone here would be a liar to pretend they don't enjoy some property that is Woke to some extent. But by its own historical standards TOS was incredibly Woke, because it was absolutely pushing a Progressive agenda in those scant 1% moments.
He's trying really hard to appropriate those terms because they are memetically famous for a lot of guys being into them as a shameful fap, hence the need to delete from a browser history. Because the "passable feminine" quality confuses some vaguely gay/bisexual dude's brains.
Which is why the trannies "claimed" the terms years ago, and said they all were evil nasty slurs meant to disparage and attack them. So now we are a decade+ into the tranny menace and most of them I doubt realize that it once had nothing to do with them, and that guys into that want nothing to do with these obvious dudes.
I'd wager the vast majority of people screeching about this don't know, or don't understand, that this guy already had multiple trials that constituted his "due process" already and was already hard labelled with tags that meant he was never allowed to be a citizen in any way.
A lot of them are just doing it to make their beard sound like a badass symbol instead of a lazy bush. I worked with two guys once who called themselves "Vikings" despite being mostly German with no Scandinavian in there.
Its one of those things that the Left is trying to appropriate as a "political statement" when its really just a lot of dudes with no identity trying to find themselves. Its like being a pagan/wiccan is for women, though that usually does become political for them.
This is one of those situations about "giving an inch."
I also find almost all people in today's world who harp on and on about being a "Viking" to be cringe and pathetic. Its a fatbellied man with a beard, that often barely has any Scandanavian heritage, trying to larp as a warrior and a badass.
But the Lefties posting shit like this are attacking it both to destroy the cultural legacy of a white nation and/or to tear down men enjoying something that isn't Feminist approved beta male activity.
The Larpers are rarely hurting anyone but their own reputation (and it can work for some men regardless) so I'll still stand by their right to be loudly cringe in this manner.
There are plenty of valid uses for all the social medias. I use Facebook (my only one) to keep contact with my poor friends who can't afford a phone or simply very old school friends who I'd never text but am marginally interested in their life.
But there are many men who use LinkedIn as god and those connections as real major things. Its a huge part of "Hustle Culture" and guys whose entire existence is to use and abuse it to groom impressionable young men into being slimy douches whose life revolves around money for zero value ventures (that rarely work) and other nonsense.
Its like Discord for 20 something dudes with a lot of spunk but no sense.
I don't care what their reasoning is, the end result is mostly the same.
Segregating spaces is a thing we can accomplish tomorrow and immediately reap the benefits of, whereas deporting them will not happen as easily or quickly no matter how much we wish it would, leaving us to suffer under both Feminism and Islam the entire time.
And then Feminism cries like women do, and the Arabs are right back in the country next generation anyway.