4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm fairly certain legally they must cease spying and delete all your data if you ask, the problem obviously being that asking is made to be nearly impossible and they only delete their copy and won't tell you who it was sold to. So you have to ask every single one in the world to remove it, which is impossible. And of course the obvious problem that they tie functionality to consent, so if you tell them off then it just won't run.

These laws however are why the government allows it, because it circumvents all the protections Americans might have against illegal searching all the way from that 4th Amendment. Sure they could do it anyway because whose gonna arrest them, but this allows them to do it completely legally and not give a shit. They win on technicality.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

The first serious woman candidate ever run, afaik, was Hillary back in 2008 who lost to Obama and then tried again to lose to Trump in 2016. Kamala was just a "there is no one else to pick" option.

If Hillary is what they think a female president should be then no one will ever be ready for the horrors that will unleash. Fortunately they tainted that well so thoroughly that the "first woman!" card will never be as effective again, because Hillary is just that unlikeable and evil.

by SNES_X
34
Adamrises 34 points ago +34 / -0

That was absolutely one of those moments that should have woke up people that this wasn't about the "waste of money" and other excuses they used against the wall, but purely about letting the illegals in without any restrictions.

It didn't but such is the hand we are dealt, a nation of heads in the sand.

I am continually shocked however that border patrol agents just let this nonsense go on and at least some true believers didn't go postal over it. I'm sure most of them were in on the plot, but even cops have some renegade who believe in the cause.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll give you women with their dogs is a symptom of a problem, but dogs are literally our oldest and most loyal companions without which we might not have escaped the stone age and I will be damned if I turn on them because hoes are trying to ruin them too.

11
Adamrises 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't even think that's a purely political thing, even if that is the cherry factor on top.

Every fucking woman these days is so boringly obsessed with "traveling." My town is filled with "van life" women (and only women) going around with their dogs and being bums. I have zero doubt if they could drive to Europe/Asia they'd be doing it there. Basic sluts have been "backpacking" across Europe for as long as I can remember. Heck, we have had infinite new stories of white girls going to India/Middle East just to end up dead for it.

The political situation has just given then a covering excuse for something they already wanted to do, run away from all responsibilities and "See the world" before they try to settle down in their 40s.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

It goes even further, because if asked they will say even more vague things like "the right to choose what happens to their body."

And then turn around and chop a chunk of their newborn's dick off so they don't have to clean it and vote to keep men Draftable.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both are degradation of your own body, in a manner that neither you nor society will ever truly let "be forgotten" yet you still did so. Intentions are irrelevant when the action itself is abhorrent and has no justifiable gain beyond hedonistic emotions like lust or love.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its okay my nigger. I'm in the minority, The Right loves sacrificing everything that it fights for just for short term legs of no value.

Its why we tolerate "former Lefties" with great ideas like "Hasan Piker the loudest pro-Palestine voice in America said something anti-Jew? This is totally a win for the Right!"

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah yes, strategy above all things to the detriment of any principles or morals. Prop up the Devil if it'll get you a leg up, reduce all Americans to economic units, anything to get that W.

Again, I'd rather see this nation end if we must compromise ourselves this low to save it. Because there is nothing worth saving at that point.

You don't need to explain anything, you openly admit that propaganda and peer pressure worked on you for years, so you would see such a tactic as valid to keep using.

5
Adamrises 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think its more beta and insecure to feel the need to respond to a complete loser when they make little yips at your ankles.

Which is why this kind of "keepin it real" behavior is common among niggers, who are so insecure they cannot let go of the slightest of slights and respond with overwhelming force to even the perception of one.

2
Adamrises 2 points ago +2 / -0

Legitimizing anything he says as useful in anyway gives his opinion worth above zero or negative. It does not matter whether its right or wrong or useful, the only response it should recieve is telling him to shutup and calling him a roach.

Again, if we are so desperate for a win that we want to take it from him, then we should give up in general because we have become too pathetic to deserve any wins.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Frankenstein is a story where the idea of it, and the philosophical quandaries you can discuss off that is well above the content itself.

The discussion of God's responsibility to his creation and in turn fear of it is profound and interesting, so much so that a single line about it from fucking Spy Kids 2 blew people's minds, but its attached to a story that is incredibly boring and full of hilariously dumb details like the Monster chasing him on dog sleds.

But the only reason its actually a thing is because the movie was a huge hit in the earliest days of film, and its gone on to be referenced and inspire so much that its impossible to not discuss it. And tellingly, it takes almost nothing from the book beyond a few generalized scenes to tell a quick hit of horror action.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have they always been this way?

Women aren't that different from men. They just can be more subtle about things.

Look at the pornography problem that men have gone through in the last decades. Where "softcore" stuff was enough for men to pay money just a generation or two ago, and now we have men with hyper fetishes that barely even make sense and an addiction to the dopamine rush of gooning to it.

Women's stuff went through much a similar path, where they dabbled in monster stuff that was still mostly human (the 90s-00s vampire craze was built on this), but it was all still heavily into the romantic, emotional angle that would be their version of "softcore" with Fabio.

Then they literally had hardcore BDSM books reach mainstream popularity and normalcy with 50 Shades of Grey. That became the baseline for their masturbation fantasies. So of course something already established like "monster fucking" would explode into some extreme levels afterward to keep chasing that taboo dopamine high.

2
Adamrises 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've never understood how anyone could look at the sheer pomp and prestige of Catholic ceremonies and buildings, where they are dripping with gold and flaunting of wealth, and pretend that Christianity still lay at the heart of anything happening in that building.

I learned more about Jesus and living the scripture while fixing a leaky roof on the shack my Baptist pastor taught out of than I did in almost a decade of attending Catholic mass.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

While she did a terrible job at it, its doubtful anyone could do a good Wonder Woman to begin with. Its just not a character that is capable of anything interesting and just exists off sheer momentum from historical legacy.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the win is accepting the most subhuman nepobaby turkroach literal Communist as anything but a target for mockery, I think we better just pack up America and call it quits. There is nothing left to save at that point.

What's next, "Vivek is actually pretty okay because he also hates the Jews!"

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm a bit baffled about the need to dig through this spaghetti nest of accounts and email addresses when we already knew

Its part of the "Leftist discourse" problem that exists across all of our culture.

They pretend to not understand something obvious so that we cannot "win" against them, so a bunch of people have decided that a mountain of evidence is the counter to that. So they just keep piling every little detail up as it will mean that the otherside must now accept it as fact.

Its a trap to fall into, but its one that keeps the "Right Wing Influencer Machine" going as it makes for neverending content.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know nothing about her or what she says, she can be completely genuine in everything. What I took umbrage with was your attempt to say "actually its not that bad at all that she did do it! Mudsharking is a-okay!"

I'd wager most of us have people who fail our purity tests and we still like them, but let's not pretend those tests aren't there for a reason and try to erase the gravity of failing them.

And personally I'd find spitroasted whores less offensive than mudsharks because getting paid is much more understandable a reason for degenerate acts than "drugs and making daddy mad." Especially as both of those things overlap in that regard, so the one getting paid is better off.

20
Adamrises 20 points ago +20 / -0

Its almost certainly just a political stunt to ride the controversy into attention and donations.

That's what these bills always are, and why they never actually get any followup. There isn't any real intention to see it through, which is why its written in the most extreme, clickbait way possible instead of a legalese that has any chance of passing.

Would be great to see it actually happen, but that's how these types operate. Lyin' Ted literally spent the last decade doing it until earlier this year.

2
Adamrises 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can agree with that. Everyone I've met that is "struggling" you can usually find a clear line of bad decisions that lead up to it. Whether its life changing or simply "I spend a lot of money regularly on transient things."

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

so I assume she lost her bearings for a bit.

This could just as apply to most whores and pornstars, yet we rightfully mock the "found myself and started a family and gained trad values after getting spitroasted on camera" girls acting like they can have an opinion on anything after such.

Everybody has their own "super unique exception" story that makes it not count in their case, but in the end they still did it.

If you like her for what she is about, that's fine. Plenty of people had terrible choices and come around after learning some lessons. But those choices still exist and reflect on us, as it should be, instead of trying to make a bunch of excuses for it.

7
Adamrises 7 points ago +7 / -0

We can also link it back to something the Left tried to make a big thing back in Trump's first term, when they tried to meme Drumpf into a big thing and made fun of the family changing their name to better fit into America.

They actually made a lineage level commitment to making this their new home. Something a lot of Whites, and pale Asians, did. But all the brownies rarely do, and usually its only a "screen name" for the PR purposes instead of a legal change.

Its not a sure fire indication, I'm sure people know examples proving both sides of the coin wrong, but its a good start.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

You raise a logical argument, but its also the same argument that women have used for decades to say "a woman's body count doesn't matter!" Which purely logically it shouldn't, but for some reason we all knew it did. Then it kept coming out that these things are symptoms of a greater issue with society or the person themselves, and we had good reason to be wary of it.

If the rate is barely 1-2%, then what does it say about those who do it? Clearly something strong is keeping women from doing it naturally, so those who overcome those natural instincts must have extraordinary reasons. And I'd bet they weren't positive ones.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

They bought up that one studio some years back and all the little wokeness started sneaking in around that time.

So its likely they keep letting the sub-studio do these types of things for them and not checking on it, because Gaben is on his 7th yacht rolling fatties.

5
Adamrises 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm old, just had my third kid and bought a house a few years back at 7.1% on the 30 year because the property was too perfect to wait on. Living in a medium high cost of living state and hovering around the 6 figure combined thanks to overtime.

And yet, we are doing fine. We aren't building much savings at the moment thanks to a car breakdown and the cost of having a baby (far below what hysteria would have you think), but I've got plenty backed up from when I could. We have nice little things, though nothing extravagant. I work some extra shifts when I've got nothing to do that day, and it carries us into some nice dinners and paying for everyone's hobbies.

I'm thankful everyday for the blessings I have, but a lot of the time it feels less like being blessed and closer to how it should be for everyone. And not in the sense of "Americans deserve this" but "I'm retarded and didn't do anything special, how are you so far behind?" Like I was born to two junkies and spent a chunk of my youth homeless before wasting my one chance at a new future on a Psychology degree, yet I managed the "American dream" as much as I want of it even with all the problems going on around us.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›