Look, I'd just gotten into hating on Trump, and now these absolute...retards* are back to making me defend him. Trump is seeming like a traitor, but I've still seen zero evidence he's a PDF.
Can the leftists get out of their own way for a second and just let Trump supporters hate on Trump? Holy shit, this is just embarrassing.
This "Epstein email" shit makes Russiagate look legit in comparison. It's literally nothing.
I'd tell the leftists to get on board and be angry with Trump for the same reasons as me...but if leftists start agreeing with me on economics I have to literally rethink my entire fucking life, and that seems like a lot of work.
/* I want to say "retards," but that doesn't even do it justice. Words fail me, so let's just stick with "retards" for now.
Mate, buddy, you are asking PROGRESSIVES to not drive off the cliff and as they are plummeting to the ground, they would STILL floor the gas saying they can go faster!
I have a better chance of a hippo not ripping me apart because I got close to their watering hole.
Everything the left touches turns to shit.
If the left hates someone? Chances are high that that person is actually good. Not always (broken clocks eh?) but a fine rule of thumb.
This lake vehemently stands with women having the right to choose
Lefties always use these euphemisms to make their positions sound better. Choose what? You mean their "right" to kill their offspring on demand? Why not just say that?
Gender affirming care for minors? You mean chopping a kid's dick off.
Sex positivity? You mean the most degenerate behavior imaginable.
And let's not forget that since it was legalized in the 70s, women have chosen to murder over 65 million people, mostly for convenience. And that's just in America.
In a way, they're accidentally representing their wider position with their euphemisms.
They support women having the right to choose, not just choosing to kill their unborn children, but literally.anything else societally destructive they want too, completely free from consequences.
Societally constructive behavior like being conservative or shaming degenerate hoes are the only things they won't support women choosing.
Water is the most politicized resource in the world.
And these are the people who wonder why no-one treats these self-proclaimed experts with any fucking respect.
Oil, gold, rare earth metals, uranium/plutonium, hell even lumber would like to have a word with this retarded body of water and his inflated sense of self importance
Eh, that could be part of it, but I think the easier answer is just that they're anti-human. It's wild how the left was indoctrinated into being such absurd demons. Literally "humanity bad."
You could make the most insane and hilarious parody caricature of a leftist's position, and you'd have leftists agreeing with you.
I was going to argue the point, and say it's both...but, yeah, you're probably correct. While they say things like "we need less people," if they got rid of white people they'd probably stop saying that. Everyone but whites can leave in peace with Nature and all that, I'm sure. And, after all, wishing for the mass death of non-whites would be racist.
So, while they are anti-human, yeah, most of that rage is focused on being anti-West, and anti-white. That's interesting, I'd never thought about it quite like that. I'd seen each issue on its own, but never put the two together like that before.
Honestly, that one sentence made me think about some things. Of course leftists aren't going to call for the extermination of blacks or browns. So they can't reach their whole "billions less" agenda.
When they're talking about needing less people on the planet...they're talking about less whites. Not even sure they think about it in precisely those terms, but the logic seems to track.
Now, some of the elites actually do also want less "minorities." Bill Gates has exterminated or sterilized who knows how many blacks in Africa with his human experimentation, for example. Those fuckers will put the nonwhites up against the wall along with the rest of us. There are people pushing legitimately anti-human agendas, but that's not your average leftist.
TIL the people who tried to push the term MAP and treated epstein like some weird witch hunt against hollywood are in fact, the true defenders of the children!
In summary, the argument by the left now is "We trust a known child molester who ran an entire island for wealthy elites to rape children over some dude that we couldn't stick anything on for the last 12 years."
15 was perfectly legal in Canada for many years under the Liberal government & our idiotic "Supreme Court". 14 in fact! You couldn't pay them (of course) or be in a position of authority (like a teacher or coach) and you couldn't give them booze. But pot was OK!
Actually? A LOT of women worked on the decoding of Enigma. They were considered "spare resources" as most of the capable men were already employed elsewhere when the project started.
Look, I'd just gotten into hating on Trump, and now these absolute...retards* are back to making me defend him. Trump is seeming like a traitor, but I've still seen zero evidence he's a PDF.
Can the leftists get out of their own way for a second and just let Trump supporters hate on Trump? Holy shit, this is just embarrassing.
This "Epstein email" shit makes Russiagate look legit in comparison. It's literally nothing.
I'd tell the leftists to get on board and be angry with Trump for the same reasons as me...but if leftists start agreeing with me on economics I have to literally rethink my entire fucking life, and that seems like a lot of work.
/* I want to say "retards," but that doesn't even do it justice. Words fail me, so let's just stick with "retards" for now.
Mate, buddy, you are asking PROGRESSIVES to not drive off the cliff and as they are plummeting to the ground, they would STILL floor the gas saying they can go faster!
I have a better chance of a hippo not ripping me apart because I got close to their watering hole.
Everything the left touches turns to shit.
If the left hates someone? Chances are high that that person is actually good. Not always (broken clocks eh?) but a fine rule of thumb.
Lefties always use these euphemisms to make their positions sound better. Choose what? You mean their "right" to kill their offspring on demand? Why not just say that?
Gender affirming care for minors? You mean chopping a kid's dick off.
Sex positivity? You mean the most degenerate behavior imaginable.
And let's not forget that since it was legalized in the 70s, women have chosen to murder over 65 million people, mostly for convenience. And that's just in America.
It goes even further, because if asked they will say even more vague things like "the right to choose what happens to their body."
And then turn around and chop a chunk of their newborn's dick off so they don't have to clean it and vote to keep men Draftable.
In a way, they're accidentally representing their wider position with their euphemisms.
They support women having the right to choose, not just choosing to kill their unborn children, but literally.anything else societally destructive they want too, completely free from consequences.
Societally constructive behavior like being conservative or shaming degenerate hoes are the only things they won't support women choosing.
And these are the people who wonder why no-one treats these self-proclaimed experts with any fucking respect.
Oil, gold, rare earth metals, uranium/plutonium, hell even lumber would like to have a word with this retarded body of water and his inflated sense of self importance
I'm just surprised "Lake Superior" didn't respond with "It's not politics it's human rights!"
The lake supports the ability for women to slaughter their infants to give to pharmaceutical and adrenechrome companies.
Eh, that could be part of it, but I think the easier answer is just that they're anti-human. It's wild how the left was indoctrinated into being such absurd demons. Literally "humanity bad."
You could make the most insane and hilarious parody caricature of a leftist's position, and you'd have leftists agreeing with you.
Anti human or anti-White humans?
I was going to argue the point, and say it's both...but, yeah, you're probably correct. While they say things like "we need less people," if they got rid of white people they'd probably stop saying that. Everyone but whites can leave in peace with Nature and all that, I'm sure. And, after all, wishing for the mass death of non-whites would be racist.
So, while they are anti-human, yeah, most of that rage is focused on being anti-West, and anti-white. That's interesting, I'd never thought about it quite like that. I'd seen each issue on its own, but never put the two together like that before.
Honestly, that one sentence made me think about some things. Of course leftists aren't going to call for the extermination of blacks or browns. So they can't reach their whole "billions less" agenda.
When they're talking about needing less people on the planet...they're talking about less whites. Not even sure they think about it in precisely those terms, but the logic seems to track.
Now, some of the elites actually do also want less "minorities." Bill Gates has exterminated or sterilized who knows how many blacks in Africa with his human experimentation, for example. Those fuckers will put the nonwhites up against the wall along with the rest of us. There are people pushing legitimately anti-human agendas, but that's not your average leftist.
Many lefties look inside themselves and conclude from what they see that humanity is too disgusting to live.
Their only mistake is not realizing their character is the exception, not the rule.
TIL the people who tried to push the term MAP and treated epstein like some weird witch hunt against hollywood are in fact, the true defenders of the children!
In summary, the argument by the left now is "We trust a known child molester who ran an entire island for wealthy elites to rape children over some dude that we couldn't stick anything on for the last 12 years."
Wew.
Basically yeah
15 was perfectly legal in Canada for many years under the Liberal government & our idiotic "Supreme Court". 14 in fact! You couldn't pay them (of course) or be in a position of authority (like a teacher or coach) and you couldn't give them booze. But pot was OK!
Actually? A LOT of women worked on the decoding of Enigma. They were considered "spare resources" as most of the capable men were already employed elsewhere when the project started.
Cloudy & Cathrine are both pretty dang funny 😸
I've always wanted. bletchely sandwich but don't think I could comprehend it. Who would put sauerkraut next to cod?