Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
To be fair, I'm not sure there's anything to indicate those specific people actually looting.
Whatever I may think of them as people if there's not the evidence there to make the claims, we must fall back on those we do have evidence for.
Like their criminal records.
That's a wider issue with people like this. To minds like your cousins, I think the only people they feel should be lauded are people who are literally perfect - and the definition of "perfect" is today's definition, not whatever definition applied at any point the person was alive.
I don't know if that's a side-effect of the usual Marxist requirement to destroy - sure, Marxists say they'll rebuild, but they always seem to become addicted to the visceral joy of destruction and never move past it - or if it's the cause of it, no world but the perfect world and all that.
The enemy's been warring on whites for generations
And yet you regard me as an enemy, seemingly, and I'm white.
Would it not be easier to admit that this is just a political thing for you, but skin colour is a great cover for it?
Having interacted with the OP ... they're still showing a fair bit of blind ideology, they've just kind of switched tracks. They scrubbed their account shortly after posting an account of how 9/11 was really the US running a false-flag and promptly called me a "JIDF shill" when asked to actually show anything at all to prove this.
I hope this person gets better soon.
I mean, we all know 9/11 was a collaborative effort between the Grays and the Lizard People.
If women actually understood where they fall on a 10/10
Well, they seem not to. Do you not recall that video - hilariously wrong.
Point to note: Claudia Webbe, the MP for jihad, managed to fail to make the cut on an all-women, all-BAME shortlist.
This terrible example of a parliamentarian was hand-picked for a safe Labour seat, the one Keith Vaz vacated after his predilection for coke and rent boys became apparent.
Makes you wonder what exactly Leicester East has done to the Labour Party...
It more-or-less goes without saying that MPs of this calibre stand very little chance of holding the government to account, and much as I deplore Labour's current position, I don't want to live in a one-party-state either...
I'm raising queries about one specific source you referenced. Or is the word of a government source the be treated as holy writ and beyond question?
Regards the result, well, I'll have to wait and see what the reasoning is. The entire trial is quite politicised and that reduces the chance of a well-reasoned verdict, whichever party that verdict favours.