Kind of like if you’re in a crowd storming the capitol and you don’t leave when they break barricades, beat the shit out of cops, chant “hang Mike Pence”, break windows and enter the building, you’re an insurrectionist.
Prosecutors are also asking the judge to block any evidence suggesting local police officers provided water to those who responded to calls on social media to take up arms to defend businesses the evening of the shooting and thanked them for showing up to help patrol the streets.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
It seems you’re already hard at work discrediting sources I haven’t even provided yet. I’m patient. I will be here when the gavel drops and Kyle is sentenced. Will you, u/APDSmith ?
I'm raising queries about one specific source you referenced. Or is the word of a government source the be treated as holy writ and beyond question?
Regards the result, well, I'll have to wait and see what the reasoning is. The entire trial is quite politicised and that reduces the chance of a well-reasoned verdict, whichever party that verdict favours.
I see you’re already setting the table with excuses. Not very confident, are you. You shouldn’t be. To your credit, that at least shows some level of intelligence.
As we learned from the Zimmermann situation if you ever walk in the direction of an unhinged person and they later attack you then you lose all right to self defense.
They will scream and cry when some criminal gets shot because he- I don't know- grabbed a cops taser- "HE DESERVES TO DIE FOR THAT!?" they screech but as soon as it's one of their protected groups if you do anything that triggers their impulse to murder then you fucking deserve it and have no right to self defense. When these mental cases cry about some criminal of the week being killed and screech at you about your lack of compassion remember that every single one of them wants you fucking dead.
Haahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Kyles so fucking fucked! They have him dead to rights on infrared camera firing the first shot before the crowd started chasing him. He wasn’t retaliating either as his muzzle flash was the first and only captured in IR. He’s done, the right will take another gigantic L and continue to be steamrolled by the rest of the world. Conservatism dies with a whimper, not a bang.
How do you know he is a christian? Do christians need to never defend themselves when they are attacked by drug addicted cumstains? Then again, if I take a peak at your post history, you have some unresolved grudge against christians like a spiteful ex-girlfriend and have severe tds syndrome. Your posts have so much passive-aggressiveness, I would have instantly guessed you leaned progressive without checking your history.
Your post history is full of bullshit spewing careful enough to tread on the line so the mods don't ban you for being a troll. I would have almost mistaked you as glowie given how much you spend posting here on this communities. Is it even worth it putting so much effort when it pays so little?
Just because he's a moderator doesn't mean he is a christian, you dick slurping shlomo. And holy shit are you fucking obsessed? You need to actually go there and have this compulsive obsession that you visit this christianity sub-com quite enough that you know he's a moderator. You shlomos always have this unhealthy fixation on something, it's fucking funny. At first, I thought it was coincidence but turns out it's always your kind that has this stalkerish behaviour, your life always revolves around one thing and 24/7, you keep around here posting. At this point it's just sad and comical then you act like you got moral high ground. Lmao.
I'm not going to ban him for just that, however, what you are saying is absolutely close to the line on Rule 16. Do not frame Christians as inherently morally inferior
Bold of you to assume that, should a similar thing happen again, this one would be the one with the gun rather than the one with the despicable criminal record...
Ok, "known rapist" and "paedophile" it is.
"Convicted child rapist shot while attacking a minor."
He lived as he died. Trying to grab a minor.
Isn't that Karma for you.
You want to talk karma. Have you ever seen the official shot placement?
Mr Pedo got hit several times, but the kill shot was to the groin.
Mr Serial Abuser got shot in the heart.
And Mr Convicted Thief (aka Mr Casually Commits War Crimes) got shot in the arm.
Those bullets must have been dipped in pure karma.
Divine intervention.
To be fair, I'm not sure there's anything to indicate those specific people actually looting.
Whatever I may think of them as people if there's not the evidence there to make the claims, we must fall back on those we do have evidence for.
Like their criminal records.
Looting, I'll give you. Rioting however...
Nah, serial domestic abuser, pedophile chasing and grabbing at a minor, and serial thief/burglar.
There's documented proof of these facts.
If you’re in a crowd of looters burning shit down and you don’t leave you’re a looter burning shit down. There’s no reason to be there otherwise.
Kind of like if you’re in a crowd storming the capitol and you don’t leave when they break barricades, beat the shit out of cops, chant “hang Mike Pence”, break windows and enter the building, you’re an insurrectionist.
I hate this time line so much.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
You have nothing.
The storm is coming.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
It seems you’re already hard at work discrediting sources I haven’t even provided yet. I’m patient. I will be here when the gavel drops and Kyle is sentenced. Will you, u/APDSmith ?
I'm raising queries about one specific source you referenced. Or is the word of a government source the be treated as holy writ and beyond question?
Regards the result, well, I'll have to wait and see what the reasoning is. The entire trial is quite politicised and that reduces the chance of a well-reasoned verdict, whichever party that verdict favours.
I see you’re already setting the table with excuses. Not very confident, are you. You shouldn’t be. To your credit, that at least shows some level of intelligence.
As we learned from the Zimmermann situation if you ever walk in the direction of an unhinged person and they later attack you then you lose all right to self defense.
They will scream and cry when some criminal gets shot because he- I don't know- grabbed a cops taser- "HE DESERVES TO DIE FOR THAT!?" they screech but as soon as it's one of their protected groups if you do anything that triggers their impulse to murder then you fucking deserve it and have no right to self defense. When these mental cases cry about some criminal of the week being killed and screech at you about your lack of compassion remember that every single one of them wants you fucking dead.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Whoa there, calm down.
....
That's the craziest shit I've heard outside of Blue Anon.
Haahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Kyles so fucking fucked! They have him dead to rights on infrared camera firing the first shot before the crowd started chasing him. He wasn’t retaliating either as his muzzle flash was the first and only captured in IR. He’s done, the right will take another gigantic L and continue to be steamrolled by the rest of the world. Conservatism dies with a whimper, not a bang.
Wait, what site are we on?
Very Christian of you. And by that of course I mean hypocritical. Christians feign victimhood while they’ve always been the aggressor. Sad.
Who said he is Christian? You must be new here, most here are not religious, we do oppose the anti-Christian narrative though.
He’s a moderator on Christianity.win you gigantic fucking retard.
How do you know he is a christian? Do christians need to never defend themselves when they are attacked by drug addicted cumstains? Then again, if I take a peak at your post history, you have some unresolved grudge against christians like a spiteful ex-girlfriend and have severe tds syndrome. Your posts have so much passive-aggressiveness, I would have instantly guessed you leaned progressive without checking your history.
Your post history is full of bullshit spewing careful enough to tread on the line so the mods don't ban you for being a troll. I would have almost mistaked you as glowie given how much you spend posting here on this communities. Is it even worth it putting so much effort when it pays so little?
He’s a moderator on Christianity.win you gigantic fucking retard.
Just because he's a moderator doesn't mean he is a christian, you dick slurping shlomo. And holy shit are you fucking obsessed? You need to actually go there and have this compulsive obsession that you visit this christianity sub-com quite enough that you know he's a moderator. You shlomos always have this unhealthy fixation on something, it's fucking funny. At first, I thought it was coincidence but turns out it's always your kind that has this stalkerish behaviour, your life always revolves around one thing and 24/7, you keep around here posting. At this point it's just sad and comical then you act like you got moral high ground. Lmao.
This is the cognitive dissonance I come here for. Thank you!
The pedophile is trying to make moral condemnations. Sad.
To be completely fair, you’re the one who has admitted to not being allowed within 500 feet of a school.
Comment Reported for: No cucks
I'm not going to ban him for just that, however, what you are saying is absolutely close to the line on Rule 16. Do not frame Christians as inherently morally inferior
Why are they a protected group?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/GIJF3rpD/welcome-ashore/c/
I see.
How come rule 16 doesn’t apply to the left, democrats, libtards, “trannies”, gays or any other group that isn’t decidedly on the right?
Will you still say the same when they come for you?
Bold of you to assume that, should a similar thing happen again, this one would be the one with the gun rather than the one with the despicable criminal record...
Comment Reported for:
No cucks
Rule 12 - Falsehoods (x2)
Comment Approved: This isn't how rule 12 works
Fine, we'll do it Sesame Street style for the poor little delicate snowflake prosecution:
One predator, pow. Two predators, pow. Three, predators, pow! Three violent predators! Ah! Ah! Ah!
Count Glockula
I thought that's a cereal mascot. I prefer The (Body) Count
Armed arsonists.
Prosecutors request there be no trial and just throw him in prison for life.