Kind of like if you’re in a crowd storming the capitol and you don’t leave when they break barricades, beat the shit out of cops, chant “hang Mike Pence”, break windows and enter the building, you’re an insurrectionist.
Prosecutors are also asking the judge to block any evidence suggesting local police officers provided water to those who responded to calls on social media to take up arms to defend businesses the evening of the shooting and thanked them for showing up to help patrol the streets.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
It seems you’re already hard at work discrediting sources I haven’t even provided yet. I’m patient. I will be here when the gavel drops and Kyle is sentenced. Will you, u/APDSmith ?
I'm raising queries about one specific source you referenced. Or is the word of a government source the be treated as holy writ and beyond question?
Regards the result, well, I'll have to wait and see what the reasoning is. The entire trial is quite politicised and that reduces the chance of a well-reasoned verdict, whichever party that verdict favours.
I see you’re already setting the table with excuses. Not very confident, are you. You shouldn’t be. To your credit, that at least shows some level of intelligence.
As we learned from the Zimmermann situation if you ever walk in the direction of an unhinged person and they later attack you then you lose all right to self defense.
They will scream and cry when some criminal gets shot because he- I don't know- grabbed a cops taser- "HE DESERVES TO DIE FOR THAT!?" they screech but as soon as it's one of their protected groups if you do anything that triggers their impulse to murder then you fucking deserve it and have no right to self defense. When these mental cases cry about some criminal of the week being killed and screech at you about your lack of compassion remember that every single one of them wants you fucking dead.
Ok, "known rapist" and "paedophile" it is.
"Convicted child rapist shot while attacking a minor."
He lived as he died. Trying to grab a minor.
Isn't that Karma for you.
You want to talk karma. Have you ever seen the official shot placement?
Mr Pedo got hit several times, but the kill shot was to the groin.
Mr Serial Abuser got shot in the heart.
And Mr Convicted Thief (aka Mr Casually Commits War Crimes) got shot in the arm.
Those bullets must have been dipped in pure karma.
Divine intervention.
To be fair, I'm not sure there's anything to indicate those specific people actually looting.
Whatever I may think of them as people if there's not the evidence there to make the claims, we must fall back on those we do have evidence for.
Like their criminal records.
Looting, I'll give you. Rioting however...
Nah, serial domestic abuser, pedophile chasing and grabbing at a minor, and serial thief/burglar.
There's documented proof of these facts.
If you’re in a crowd of looters burning shit down and you don’t leave you’re a looter burning shit down. There’s no reason to be there otherwise.
Kind of like if you’re in a crowd storming the capitol and you don’t leave when they break barricades, beat the shit out of cops, chant “hang Mike Pence”, break windows and enter the building, you’re an insurrectionist.
I hate this time line so much.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
You have nothing.
The storm is coming.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
It seems you’re already hard at work discrediting sources I haven’t even provided yet. I’m patient. I will be here when the gavel drops and Kyle is sentenced. Will you, u/APDSmith ?
I'm raising queries about one specific source you referenced. Or is the word of a government source the be treated as holy writ and beyond question?
Regards the result, well, I'll have to wait and see what the reasoning is. The entire trial is quite politicised and that reduces the chance of a well-reasoned verdict, whichever party that verdict favours.
I see you’re already setting the table with excuses. Not very confident, are you. You shouldn’t be. To your credit, that at least shows some level of intelligence.
As we learned from the Zimmermann situation if you ever walk in the direction of an unhinged person and they later attack you then you lose all right to self defense.
They will scream and cry when some criminal gets shot because he- I don't know- grabbed a cops taser- "HE DESERVES TO DIE FOR THAT!?" they screech but as soon as it's one of their protected groups if you do anything that triggers their impulse to murder then you fucking deserve it and have no right to self defense. When these mental cases cry about some criminal of the week being killed and screech at you about your lack of compassion remember that every single one of them wants you fucking dead.
Comment Reported for:
No cucks
Rule 12 - Falsehoods (x2)
Comment Approved: This isn't how rule 12 works
Sorry sweaty, you got one hero in jail but you aren’t getting any more
the nyt couldn't spin it against kyle, what makes you think you can?
Fine, we'll do it Sesame Street style for the poor little delicate snowflake prosecution:
One predator, pow. Two predators, pow. Three, predators, pow! Three violent predators! Ah! Ah! Ah!
Count Glockula
I thought that's a cereal mascot. I prefer The (Body) Count
Armed arsonists.
Prosecutors request there be no trial and just throw him in prison for life.