13
APDSmith 13 points ago +13 / -0

Pictures FlauntandStraunt rocking back and forth on his chair: Andromeda's not real, it's just a bad dream, it's not real...

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, what these would-be Party apparatchiks want as a continual low-grade race war between the various demographic (and therefore, to their minds, political) blocs that they get to referee.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure the media does not want to be knowledgeable, because the rest of their little clique would disown them if they departed from the party line.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

So in addition to the UK's pioneering right to rape for trans and muslim communities, Canada is re-taking the lead in civil rights by granting trans people the right to assault.

I do hope we don't find out if this extends to a trans right to murder, but honestly, given Yaniv's complete lack of consequences, I fail to see why they should not push their luck.

14
APDSmith 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah, "detained without charge" isn't normally a step up in terms of your civil liberties, is it?

12
APDSmith 12 points ago +12 / -0

From Biden:

we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it’s over we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over,

Yes, because the US economy is going to be horse-drawn by the time Biden has finished with it.

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

Legally, no, you're completely correct, but I'm wondering if this is some kind of play to allow the DNC to throw national resources at pushing around the Georgia RNC?

The modern DNC's behaviour is difficult for me to predict because they don't seem to consider themselves bound by legal behaviour, only bad optics. And they have huge helping hands on that score from their friends in the media.

11
APDSmith 11 points ago +11 / -0

If they charge her with anything she gets the opportunity to defend herself, I'm pretty confident that's the last thing the democrats want.

Is this purely so that they can exert unaccountable pressure on State-level organisations so that the DNC get to pick not only their candidates but their opposition too?

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

Apparently one of the points of the film is that all of the male characters (apart from the sainted, departed Husband of Colour) are played by the same guy, and they are all arseholes.

So yeah, according to this movie, men are nothing more than objects of hate who all look the same to the lead. Hmm, that language seems a little problematic, doesn't it?

In fact one of the critics goes further than that:

The moral of this film appears to be: every male, regardless of age and social status, means harm to womankind. Men are defined, and propelled, by the ill will that they bear to the opposite sex, and by their barely concealed belief that women, from Eve to Harper, are asking for trouble.

About the only thing this film missed is an earnest call to rise up and kill all men before they get you

19
APDSmith 19 points ago +19 / -0

It is we who will set the political agenda for the next decade, and not them.'

The blood-sucking establishment's response: https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1529155861880483840?cxt=HHwWgMC9mfLJ07gqAAAA

Assert the Jan 6th protest was an insurrection (has anybody actually been charged with insurrection yet?) and use that to administratively deny representation, presumably because the Democrats feel US voters are just too damned stupid to vote they way that the DNC tells them to.

16
APDSmith 16 points ago +16 / -0

At this point it could be ideology or it could be stock market manipulation - remember Gates holds a huge short on stock in Musk companies.

I'm not sure if Gates actually knows the difference between a deeply-held moral conviction and something that provides him financial benefit by this point.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

They mostly seem to be about removing the "human" attribute from people as convenient. Not human, no human rights.

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's only been a disaster if you're looking at profit-and-loss. If you're instead looking at YouTube as a tool to indoctrinate people, it's working quite well.

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

You want the roads fixed?! But there's a war on!

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

This appears to be trying to fix the other end of the racism "problem" in the US and UK - the demand vastly outstripping the supply.

Some studies indicate that unconscious bias training makes people more conscious, not less, of race. Just as with everything else, even racism is seeing inflationary pressure at the moment.

1
APDSmith 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, if you're a bit special needs and always assume that the way things are now are the worst they can get (I suspect because they're not the Glorious Communist Utopia, but don't really have any backing for that), any change is a good change.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

It honestly seems to be a culture-warrior move to demoralise their opposition (us) - it's a statement that there is nothing we can build that they cannot destroy.

by folx
2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

Myer

Don't talk to me about those filthy heathen!

Using EDI in the modern era, somebody ought to hang for that...

(Seriously, look at the Myer supplier site, and then cry when you realise some poor bastard had to work with that nonsense)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›