It's why standing in someone's way as they try to leave a confined space, without making physical contact with them, is battery and false imprisonment.
He was not "physically restrained" because he didn't try to escape. If he did try to escape, then they would say that they had to physically restrain him because he got belligerent.
My crew and myself were detained by heavily-armed officers, searched, fully frisked one by one, and not allowed to leave for over an hour. We have this on video. You are liars.
The better to punch, and thereby sting into reality. More important than size, is the ability to detect trace poison: like references to big noses, O consoomer proselyteer.
Detention/detained implies "prevented movement"; it was wholly forestalled. Whereas Arrest/arrested implies "halted movement"; it was quashed. So the distinction is whether JP was not moving or already moving.
Physical contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).
If JP was walking, he was arrested and THEN detained in one spot, without ever being assaulted... --Accurate
Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it to annoy them, via precision. And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the terms better'n I did.
I am getting really tired of seeing 1984 being acted out every single day somewhere in this fucked up world. No, no . . . he wasn't ARRESTED, he was DETAINED. Don't you know the difference you illiterate plebs? Keep up!"
Politifact is obviously politically biased, so for them to claim to be a neutral source dedicated to checking media claims of fact is ludicrous.
You don’t have to be “physically detained” to be detained. This is more pathetic word games.
Not being allowed to leave is a physical restraint on your movement.
That's why if you try to do that as a private person to another private person, it's classified as a kidnapping.
It's why standing in someone's way as they try to leave a confined space, without making physical contact with them, is battery and false imprisonment.
He was not "physically restrained" because he didn't try to escape. If he did try to escape, then they would say that they had to physically restrain him because he got belligerent.
The ole WOT attack crosses into legal minutiae AND rhetorical sophistry. Flooding. Who knew?? (we all did)
Weasel words from weasel outlets.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1529542130934468608
https://twitter.com/AnonNews14/status/1529553427642126336
Leftists always lie because they hate the truth and whites.
Leftists don't even have to believe their own lies. They just tell lies for fun and rape children for fun.
All leftists are pure evil
The Fabian Socialists don't care about whites, because whites are just as disposable of a demographic to them as any other.
In this specific case, the Leftist media isn't acting with hatred against whites, they are just acting on behalf of their paymasters.
Arested, maybe not literally. Detained, absolutely.
Yeah, "detained without charge" isn't normally a step up in terms of your civil liberties, is it?
Imagine the balls to try and make the prosecutor argue that to a judge.
"The suspect was not detained for the hour and a half we held him on the side of the road and searched him."
The left hides its poisons in the crural folds of legal intertrigo... Use your nose.
But the left has bigger noses
The better to punch, and thereby sting into reality. More important than size, is the ability to detect trace poison: like references to big noses, O consoomer proselyteer.
Funny how they switched the word "detained" from the claim to "Arrested".
Detention/detained implies "prevented movement"; it was wholly forestalled. Whereas Arrest/arrested implies "halted movement"; it was quashed. So the distinction is whether JP was not moving or already moving.
Physical contact just ups the tortious portion to assault (which must then be justified).
Something like that. Words mean things, and the left doesn't like that non-postmodern fact. So use it to annoy them, via precision. And any legal brains out there, feel free to dissect the terms better'n I did.
JP said detained. He was detained. Detained is being stopped and then told you can't leave by police.
That's the proper term.
Politifacts used arrested because they're hacks.
No, it's not. Being detained and being placed under arrest are 2 different things and have no relation to whether you're moving or not.
Any fact checking site that disallow comments is lying to you
“The police did not arrest any journalists in Davos”
No one ever said he was arrested you stupid cunt.
They can have him.
I am getting really tired of seeing 1984 being acted out every single day somewhere in this fucked up world. No, no . . . he wasn't ARRESTED, he was DETAINED. Don't you know the difference you illiterate plebs? Keep up!"
Politifact is obviously politically biased, so for them to claim to be a neutral source dedicated to checking media claims of fact is ludicrous.