I'm fairly sure most Twitter lefties are not comfortable recognising that black-not-Black even exists.
Given the propensities of the left in general, I suppose would should be thankful that for now, they're content with mere rhetorical erasure rather than actual genocide.
It actually kinda makes sense, if you look at it this way:
"Black" is a political party. Kenyans, by and large, don't care about this political party, so they're only black rather than Black.
Makes it crystal clear what they've advocating for when they raise hands and demand "Black power", though, doesn't it?
Oh, they're absolutely a threat.
You must have seen that over the past few years.
They'll operate in packs to mitigate the qualitative disadvantage they're operating under, and if they're operating on friendly territory, they'll surround the mark, in the knowledge that if the dude does defend himself, he'll never be let out of jail.
Any attackers that beat or even kill the guy, if they are ever found, will be released due to some technical mistake with their paperwork.
That's assuming they don't manage to pop up another CHAZ and just go on a quiet purge in between raping residents, of course.
... OK, so how long before, out of consideration for other cultures, they're required to wear a headscarf. Some of their teachers with an immigrant background no doubt find women's hair to be distracting, too.
In fact, why no go the whole hog and mandate the niqab for all girls in the school?
Given their stated reason, there is no justification for holding back, is there?
While they're at it, it's probably very offensive to those immigrant-background teachers to be surrounded by infidels. Forced conversions are authentically Muslim; I think the school knows what it has to do.
Even if you subscribe Imp's apparent view that women form some kind of wasp-like eusocial hive mind, Heard still doesn't do well here, because she's shown herself to be the kind of damaged personality that will throw other women under the bus too.
Why would some woman-insect collective consciousness tolerate that?
Oh, Ace has had a hard-on for Jester since before this account (Ace has run through many, many accounts, Ace has historically been a big believer that his favoured message of race war is far too important to be bound by any forum rules)
I believe my response the last time this came up was "Show me which rule he's broken and I'll call for his ban myself!"
Any progress on that, Ace?
Edit: I am being genuine there, by the way, Ace. Jester doesn't mean enough to me for me to want to compromise my principles to keep him around, very much the same as yourself... perhaps you might provide some information rather than downvoting?
We are increasingly afraid to work with each other, to flirt with each other, to love each other. We are becoming terrified of what, not so very long ago, was the most natural thing in the world.
Yes. That was a choice feminists made. That was the entire point of MeToo, was it not? Legal or not, you have offended a woman, you are now ostracised...
In a similar vein:
The marshal's office would not normally examine the details of cell phone data or engage in a broad-scale investigation of personnel.
The marshal's office would not normally need to, now, would it?
Don't know if I'd say "corrupt", but British courts, given far too much of a free hand by a Parliament that just doesn't want to get involved, have turned the British libel laws into a complete joke.