Who gives a shit what a British court opines on an American case? Go adjudicate your benighted police state.
I used to be an Anglophile until your ruling class began destroying your once-great nation with a flood of backward, bigoted, rapey North African "refugees" and turned your once-proud capitol into Londonistan and other towns into Muslimgrooming centers for teenage English girls. I mean, for evidence of the Great Replacement, one need only to look to the UK. It is undeniable.
Now your rulers are forcing some poor schmucks in a little Cornish village to put up "refugees" in their homes while thousands of white natives sleep rough and the NHS groans under the weight of impossible demand while very recently enforcing the most ridiculous coof clampdown and jab coercion in the world.
I mean, the world can see what Westminster is doing to you all. It's horrifying.
I used to be an Anglophile until your ruling class began destroying your once-great nation with a flood of backward, bigoted, rapey North African "refugees"
No, that's France. The rapey refugees in England are Pakistanis.
Don't know if I'd say "corrupt", but British courts, given far too much of a free hand by a Parliament that just doesn't want to get involved, have turned the British libel laws into a complete joke.
Even if the courts were fair, didn't the judge have multiple conflicts of interest? Went as far as denying Johnny and his lawyers from presenting evidence that later won his case in US courts. Absolute farce of a trial.
Everyone knows there is zero chance for a man to get a fair trial in the UK. It's common knowledge
Didn't you also panic about a 'male curfey', claim that AstraZeneca would be mandated, that those going to get Pfizer would be injected with AZ, and that women would be exempt from it?
Are you taking the stance that men do get fair trials in the UK?
I'm taking the stance that no one is guaranteed a fair trial in the UK, or anywhere in the West, if your trial is at all politically sensitive.
Does that mean that you are taking the stance that this trial was fair?
I don't know who was right, the US jury or the UK judge. I have not looked into the facts myself, nor followed the trial.
But just because you do not like the result, does not automatically mean that the trial was unfair - that's what AH supporters say about the US case.
Because if a rich, famous, male star can't get a fair trial against a woman, then what chance does the average man have?
If the trial was prejudiced, then it depends on the prejudice. If it's to not undermine MeToo, then it means that the average man has a much better case, as his case is not reported on in the media.
I'm pleased that you find this stance reasonable. I'm trying to play a bit of devil's advocate, simply because I don't like that people claim courts are unfair when they go against them but fair when they agree with verdicts.
I think you misunderstood my initial comment. I was not making any comment on fairness or lack thereof, just challenging the blanket claim that "men" never get fair trials in England. If I steal something from a store, I do expect a fair trial, just as an example.
They sure as shit get unfair sentences. Worst of all, they don't even get deported, so there are cases where the victims later run into them out and about and they can't do anything about it.
Who gives a shit what a British court opines on an American case? Go adjudicate your benighted police state.
I used to be an Anglophile until your ruling class began destroying your once-great nation with a flood of backward, bigoted, rapey North African "refugees" and turned your once-proud capitol into Londonistan and other towns into Muslimgrooming centers for teenage English girls. I mean, for evidence of the Great Replacement, one need only to look to the UK. It is undeniable.
Now your rulers are forcing some poor schmucks in a little Cornish village to put up "refugees" in their homes while thousands of white natives sleep rough and the NHS groans under the weight of impossible demand while very recently enforcing the most ridiculous coof clampdown and jab coercion in the world.
I mean, the world can see what Westminster is doing to you all. It's horrifying.
No, that's France. The rapey refugees in England are Pakistanis.
False.
A British court ruled that The Sun were within their rights to say that Amber Heard called her ex-husband a "wife-beater".
Don't know if I'd say "corrupt", but British courts, given far too much of a free hand by a Parliament that just doesn't want to get involved, have turned the British libel laws into a complete joke.
Even if the courts were fair, didn't the judge have multiple conflicts of interest? Went as far as denying Johnny and his lawyers from presenting evidence that later won his case in US courts. Absolute farce of a trial.
Didn't you also panic about a 'male curfey', claim that AstraZeneca would be mandated, that those going to get Pfizer would be injected with AZ, and that women would be exempt from it?
So not sure you are an authority on the matter.
Also, do rape gang members get unfair trials too?
I'm taking the stance that no one is guaranteed a fair trial in the UK, or anywhere in the West, if your trial is at all politically sensitive.
I don't know who was right, the US jury or the UK judge. I have not looked into the facts myself, nor followed the trial.
But just because you do not like the result, does not automatically mean that the trial was unfair - that's what AH supporters say about the US case.
If the trial was prejudiced, then it depends on the prejudice. If it's to not undermine MeToo, then it means that the average man has a much better case, as his case is not reported on in the media.
I'm pleased that you find this stance reasonable. I'm trying to play a bit of devil's advocate, simply because I don't like that people claim courts are unfair when they go against them but fair when they agree with verdicts.
I think you misunderstood my initial comment. I was not making any comment on fairness or lack thereof, just challenging the blanket claim that "men" never get fair trials in England. If I steal something from a store, I do expect a fair trial, just as an example.
They sure as shit get unfair sentences. Worst of all, they don't even get deported, so there are cases where the victims later run into them out and about and they can't do anything about it.