Stop using the UK's corrupt courts as evidence.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Didn't you also panic about a 'male curfey', claim that AstraZeneca would be mandated, that those going to get Pfizer would be injected with AZ, and that women would be exempt from it?
So not sure you are an authority on the matter.
Also, do rape gang members get unfair trials too?
I'm taking the stance that no one is guaranteed a fair trial in the UK, or anywhere in the West, if your trial is at all politically sensitive.
I don't know who was right, the US jury or the UK judge. I have not looked into the facts myself, nor followed the trial.
But just because you do not like the result, does not automatically mean that the trial was unfair - that's what AH supporters say about the US case.
If the trial was prejudiced, then it depends on the prejudice. If it's to not undermine MeToo, then it means that the average man has a much better case, as his case is not reported on in the media.
I'm pleased that you find this stance reasonable. I'm trying to play a bit of devil's advocate, simply because I don't like that people claim courts are unfair when they go against them but fair when they agree with verdicts.
I think you misunderstood my initial comment. I was not making any comment on fairness or lack thereof, just challenging the blanket claim that "men" never get fair trials in England. If I steal something from a store, I do expect a fair trial, just as an example.
They sure as shit get unfair sentences. Worst of all, they don't even get deported, so there are cases where the victims later run into them out and about and they can't do anything about it.