Stop using the UK's corrupt courts as evidence.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
They are fucking shameless. Everyone knows there is zero chance for a man to get a fair trial in the UK. It's common knowledge, has been since "coercive control" got added to the law.
Anyone who thought losing would make them better people, provide a reality check, nope. They double down that their corrupt systems and hatred should rule everything.
Even if the courts were fair, didn't the judge have multiple conflicts of interest? Went as far as denying Johnny and his lawyers from presenting evidence that later won his case in US courts. Absolute farce of a trial.
Didn't you also panic about a 'male curfey', claim that AstraZeneca would be mandated, that those going to get Pfizer would be injected with AZ, and that women would be exempt from it?
So not sure you are an authority on the matter.
Also, do rape gang members get unfair trials too?
I'm taking the stance that no one is guaranteed a fair trial in the UK, or anywhere in the West, if your trial is at all politically sensitive.
I don't know who was right, the US jury or the UK judge. I have not looked into the facts myself, nor followed the trial.
But just because you do not like the result, does not automatically mean that the trial was unfair - that's what AH supporters say about the US case.
If the trial was prejudiced, then it depends on the prejudice. If it's to not undermine MeToo, then it means that the average man has a much better case, as his case is not reported on in the media.
They sure as shit get unfair sentences. Worst of all, they don't even get deported, so there are cases where the victims later run into them out and about and they can't do anything about it.