Can A.I. save the stock market?
(twitter.com)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
laws for thee, but not for (((me)))
Have you heard of "Q-day?"
I'm not a migatard so no.
You will
6,789,249D chess.
Moore's Law or something like that
Not that Q. "Q-Day" is the day that Quantum computing breaks modern cryptography and the entire finance sector collapses in the aftermath.
Is it behind the ice wall?
You'll figure it out
Then fill me in. Don't just lead people on and then never tell them anything. Would you like that?
Okay
You just outed yourself as a dumb fuck.
NESARA Gesara hocus pocus
The very concept of stock markets cannot be saved.
Agree. Nothing good comes of them.
If companies need capital, they should raise it from people close to them who understand the operations and market, not semi-rich speculators. The whole thing becomes a pyramid scheme where "fund managers" are recruited by companies in order to recruit clueless investors (which is the only way your savings will keep up with inflation, other than buying physical metal) and then, when everything goes tits up, the government bails them out with our tax dollars.
This is a system that incentivises buying existing companies and looting them over building or growing companies.
Burn it down.
I dont think we can put the genie back in the lamp with this one. Stock market generates wealth (though unfairly distributed) which means if we stopped foreign governments wouldn't and we would fall behind.
That's not wealth. It's numbers on a spreadsheet in a database that have no intrinsic value.
Thank you. Finally someone fucking said it.
We could easily return to the old paradigm of stock having to return dividends at a preset rate per annum and strictly limiting the percentage of the company that can be held by other companies.
The term "stock" goes back to cattle and sheep. The concept of trading isn't going away nor is the idea of a publicly shared company. Learn about it.
We can make anything illegal. Anything.
I've become a big fan of people posting the images of all the different company names in big squares going red/green and an attached Grug yelling "Goyblocks RED!!! Goyblocks GREEN!!!" No matter what they're doing, the average person's life is unaffected. There's other, more insidious poisons ruining their lives, and the market going up or down a few percent is basically irrelevant.
It can compile and read a spreadsheet. Yay! Nothing python or any other scripting language can at 3% the cost.
Have you heard of Q-Day?
Govgreed for those who want to check it out personally.
Grok's take on it all:
It's interesting and good for everyone to know, but I'm not sure that politicians buying or selling even if they are becoming wildly rich off it are the ruin to the stock market. Even like a Pelosi who's worth, what, $500M, that money is a tiny molecule to the trillions that make up the whole market. They don't have the assets to drive the market via insider trading.
They shape it with policy, but they'd do that anyway for their benefactors who control the real volumes of money that matter.
I'd say the much much bigger problem is that the companies that make individual politicians rich get preferential legislation.
Yeah, this is part of the larger lobbying issue but, with stock trading, they've effectively eliminated any limits that could be imposed on lobbying and totally bypassed reporting requirements.
Yeah that was really my point but your way of putting it is more well written.
Shes absolutely correct, too bad the dumb cunt is ignoring the ones on the left like Ro Khanna. Both sides need to hang.