Admittedly, I might not mind this in the case of property that was previously bought up by Blackrock and the like. Although I'd rather the property be sold to proper tenants rather than community or government ones.
And that's admittedly with a total disregard for legal procedure, which would be a total mess. So not an entirely serious thought but at the same time, fuck Blackrock.
I'd mind it not matter who owns it, and PE only own around 2-3% of single family homes. They're just an easy punching bag but virtually nothing to do with home prices.
No one ever steals anything. They're just "transferring ownership".
An important milestone in any intelligent person's life is realizing that there really aren't "new things" in politics or economics. Everything that appears new is just an old idea dressed up in new (often obscurantist) language in order to scam a new generation.
That's the cost of Republicans abandoning domestic policy to solely focus on Israel. Don't be shocked that Democrats are taking over when they are effectively running unopposed.
Voters only care about their own problems, and will vote for the party with a bad solution over the party with no solution any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Clearly violates the 5th amendment. The only legal ways they can accomplish this is by fining the owners so much for some sort of breach that the owners willingly give up the property. This tactic has been used in cities with abandoned properties before. It could work for extremely rundown properties that violates some sort of made up safety issue.
A lot of the absentee and negligent landlords are jewish. Take that shit away from them. They collect the rent, put nothing into the building until it becomes a slum, then skip off to israel.
Transfer ownership = steal private property.
Commies always love playing with words.
Trump not doing that dictator king thing and imprisoning all communists is really weak dictatoring
Admittedly, I might not mind this in the case of property that was previously bought up by Blackrock and the like. Although I'd rather the property be sold to proper tenants rather than community or government ones.
And that's admittedly with a total disregard for legal procedure, which would be a total mess. So not an entirely serious thought but at the same time, fuck Blackrock.
I'd mind it not matter who owns it, and PE only own around 2-3% of single family homes. They're just an easy punching bag but virtually nothing to do with home prices.
Counterpoint: look up the names of NYC's worst landlords.
No one ever steals anything. They're just "transferring ownership".
An important milestone in any intelligent person's life is realizing that there really aren't "new things" in politics or economics. Everything that appears new is just an old idea dressed up in new (often obscurantist) language in order to scam a new generation.
Strategically Transferring Equipment to an Alternate Location.
So the ownership can be transferred back?
That's the cost of Republicans abandoning domestic policy to solely focus on Israel. Don't be shocked that Democrats are taking over when they are effectively running unopposed.
Voters only care about their own problems, and will vote for the party with a bad solution over the party with no solution any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
So, think there will be anything left of New York City to reclaim after his term?
And who wants to bet the FIRST target will be Trump tower in some ridiculous overreach that may get the Supreme Court involved?
9/11 part 2 but they hit Trump tower and it’s also an inside job.
iT wAs StAgEd!1!
Trump should send Ma'am Dummy a photo of Maduro in handcuffs. As a reminder what happens to socialist commie fucks.
deport
Those slums were promised to them 6,000,000 years ago.
He's inadvertently doing an antisemitism. You know who else made lists and seized property from our greatest allies?!
If only.
Anyone remember the slumlord real estate plot from the Sopranos? Well, here comes the Pradeshes
Clearly violates the 5th amendment. The only legal ways they can accomplish this is by fining the owners so much for some sort of breach that the owners willingly give up the property. This tactic has been used in cities with abandoned properties before. It could work for extremely rundown properties that violates some sort of made up safety issue.
Oh right, the constitution! Why didn't we think to use that to stop government overreach a long time ago?
They always complain about us misusing power, then they misuse their power! That's HYPOCRITICAL!
The city itself is a massive slumlord. Are they going to give away their slums to a more responsible owner?
Certainly one with a bigger nose
For states that have suffered chronic neglect, can we work to transfer leadership to responsible stewards? NY should have lost statehood by now.
Buncha control freaks on power trip total tyranny false leaders from satan
A lot of the absentee and negligent landlords are jewish. Take that shit away from them. They collect the rent, put nothing into the building until it becomes a slum, then skip off to israel.