I'm still trying to understand how me paying higher taxes will end global warming...oh, yeah, sorry, "Climate Change".
It's like donating money to any medical research, they get millions from the government. Do the researchers really need twenty bucks from me to push them over the top, or do they need it to pay bigger salaries to themselves?
When you have elitist douchebag shot callers like Fauci in positions of power at the organizations that handle the cash allotments, money tends to get diverted to less savory and less ethical studies that nobody would ever donate to. Cancer cures and sick kids are the golden goose when it comes to pulling at heartstrings but experiments on breeding mosquitoes and man-made, deployment-ready apocalyptic flu bugs don't bring it in.
It's like donating money to any medical research, they get millions from the government
And they aren't going to give the patents away for free, or give it to the government if they find something. Only time the government ever seems to require a patent stake for funding everything is if the military bankrolls it.
I feel like an asshole for saying this but I hate seeing St. Judes commercials anymore. I had this assumption that doctors and staff there were working for free or volunteering to help kids. I looked it up and even support positions like janitorial and cooks were paid higher than the national average.
The commercials say you're money is going to help keep the lights on. I doubt that. I'm not suggesting the staff doesn't deserve compensation but stop pretending you're poor when you are not.
Turns out, eating a semi-unbalanced diet, and then topping it off with 5 servings of whiskey, every single day, WILL lead to some minor health complications even in as short as a month. Which is weird, since McDonalds didn't serve alcohol, amazing how that turned up in his system.
We've already passed 6 or 7 "irreversible tipping points" so far. If they were so irreversible, why do we keep hearing new dates for them?
Why do Alarmists ignore China and India? They both are on track to DOUBLE CO2 emissions by 2030 from the date of the Paris Accord. That is their "Paris Pledge" actually.
China waved their "Obama Agreement" which allows them to double CO2 and pledged to do just that, THEN for sure they'll start lowering it. 🙄
India pledged to lower emission... after they get 2 Trillion USD to do so! Meanwhile? Double by 2030.
Try telling these "Inconvenient Truths" to Alarmists and watch their heads spin!
If Canada were to CEASE emitting CO2? No industry, no oil, no heat, no agriculture, no transportation at all? It would make a 0.01C difference by 2100. India & China would wipe out our reduction (About 720) with their annual increases (about 560) in just 16 months.
I've taken the stance that anyone who complains about global warming who isn't advocating for war with China and India isn't actually serious about the issue.
That and Nuclear Power which is the only low CO2 (nearly zero!) endless power source. They hate it more than anything else, probably because it actually fixes the "problem".
If they were so irreversible, why do we keep hearing new dates for them?
If this is true, why are ae still trying to reverse it with renewables and carbon sequestration? If it's already over, we should pump as much oil as we can to power our industrial AC units and air purifiers.
Yup! All the "green movement" has done is damage Western economies & graft money. Under the very thin veneer of "green" they are all "commie pink" to the core.
In 2004 Michael Crichton released the book "State of Fear" which was about eco-terrorist faking climate catastrophes to further their green agenda.
Michael Crichton planned on writing a book about a climate catastrophe to inspire people to adapt a green agenda. However in his research on the topic he found that the data didn't support the climate hysteria. So his book became about the hypocrisy of the champagne activist preening about their environmental virture while terrorists killed people in the name of climate change.
We all need to suffer and live worse for the bogeyman of climate change. While China, India, and essentially ever other brown nation pollutes non-stop. Fuck off.
Gore's power point presentation had a minimum of 17 facts that were easily disproven on day 1.
If you take his "cherry picker" graphs and line them up? They show 1/4 of the time CO2 rise PRE-ceeds (AGW theory!) 1/2 it mostly coincidental to and 1/4 definitely follows rising temps. There's no proof in his graphs of one of AGW's foundational ideas.
Didn't anyone wonder WHY he split them up like that? He actually used a cherry-picker too! 😜
& etc.
Now he's warning us of... GLOBAL COOLING! One cannot make this shit up!
I've never been more sus of graphs in general. I've seen too many average temperature graphs that only run ten years yet try to forecast the next hundred years; not to mention they forecast on trend lines only and not actual planetary conditions and events. I've seen graphs of stocks "nosediving" where the Y-axis bounds are between 90 and 120 points.
Far too much stock is taken in "normal" temperature anyway. The local news said today's high temp would be "almost normal." That would still make it abnormal, so I should panic. And if it's 80 degrees in Podunk on May 25 2000, why should it have to be 80 degrees on May 25 2030?
Reading the comments in Dr. Roy Spencer's blog, I'm convinced climatologists aren't anywhere near as capable of predicting climate as people give them credit for. Put a dozen in a room and you won't find any two who agree on everything.
I'm still trying to understand how me paying higher taxes will end global warming...oh, yeah, sorry, "Climate Change".
It's like donating money to any medical research, they get millions from the government. Do the researchers really need twenty bucks from me to push them over the top, or do they need it to pay bigger salaries to themselves?
When you have elitist douchebag shot callers like Fauci in positions of power at the organizations that handle the cash allotments, money tends to get diverted to less savory and less ethical studies that nobody would ever donate to. Cancer cures and sick kids are the golden goose when it comes to pulling at heartstrings but experiments on breeding mosquitoes and man-made, deployment-ready apocalyptic flu bugs don't bring it in.
And they aren't going to give the patents away for free, or give it to the government if they find something. Only time the government ever seems to require a patent stake for funding everything is if the military bankrolls it.
I feel like an asshole for saying this but I hate seeing St. Judes commercials anymore. I had this assumption that doctors and staff there were working for free or volunteering to help kids. I looked it up and even support positions like janitorial and cooks were paid higher than the national average.
The commercials say you're money is going to help keep the lights on. I doubt that. I'm not suggesting the staff doesn't deserve compensation but stop pretending you're poor when you are not.
They were lying to distract you. The "climate change" was demographic all along.
I remember liberal people I knew cumming thier brains out to this movie and Super Size Me. Total midwit trash.
Turns out, eating a semi-unbalanced diet, and then topping it off with 5 servings of whiskey, every single day, WILL lead to some minor health complications even in as short as a month. Which is weird, since McDonalds didn't serve alcohol, amazing how that turned up in his system.
Super Size dude's doctor was baffled it had liver disease.
Turns out severe, daily alchool abuse damages your liver, whatever diet you're on.
It was all fraud.
John Stossel is actually a really good reporter!
We've already passed 6 or 7 "irreversible tipping points" so far. If they were so irreversible, why do we keep hearing new dates for them?
Why do Alarmists ignore China and India? They both are on track to DOUBLE CO2 emissions by 2030 from the date of the Paris Accord. That is their "Paris Pledge" actually.
China waved their "Obama Agreement" which allows them to double CO2 and pledged to do just that, THEN for sure they'll start lowering it. 🙄
India pledged to lower emission... after they get 2 Trillion USD to do so! Meanwhile? Double by 2030.
Try telling these "Inconvenient Truths" to Alarmists and watch their heads spin!
If Canada were to CEASE emitting CO2? No industry, no oil, no heat, no agriculture, no transportation at all? It would make a 0.01C difference by 2100. India & China would wipe out our reduction (About 720) with their annual increases (about 560) in just 16 months.
I've taken the stance that anyone who complains about global warming who isn't advocating for war with China and India isn't actually serious about the issue.
That and Nuclear Power which is the only low CO2 (nearly zero!) endless power source. They hate it more than anything else, probably because it actually fixes the "problem".
Not to mention total repatriation of vile, inconsiderate, polluting third world litterbugs.
If this is true, why are ae still trying to reverse it with renewables and carbon sequestration? If it's already over, we should pump as much oil as we can to power our industrial AC units and air purifiers.
Yup! All the "green movement" has done is damage Western economies & graft money. Under the very thin veneer of "green" they are all "commie pink" to the core.
In 2004 Michael Crichton released the book "State of Fear" which was about eco-terrorist faking climate catastrophes to further their green agenda.
Michael Crichton planned on writing a book about a climate catastrophe to inspire people to adapt a green agenda. However in his research on the topic he found that the data didn't support the climate hysteria. So his book became about the hypocrisy of the champagne activist preening about their environmental virture while terrorists killed people in the name of climate change.
Was there a chapter about eco-terrorists setting forest fires like in real life?
I haven't read the book since it's release, I don't remember any real details
We all need to suffer and live worse for the bogeyman of climate change. While China, India, and essentially ever other brown nation pollutes non-stop. Fuck off.
Username checks out.
Gore's power point presentation had a minimum of 17 facts that were easily disproven on day 1.
If you take his "cherry picker" graphs and line them up? They show 1/4 of the time CO2 rise PRE-ceeds (AGW theory!) 1/2 it mostly coincidental to and 1/4 definitely follows rising temps. There's no proof in his graphs of one of AGW's foundational ideas.
Didn't anyone wonder WHY he split them up like that? He actually used a cherry-picker too! 😜
& etc.
Now he's warning us of... GLOBAL COOLING! One cannot make this shit up!
I've never been more sus of graphs in general. I've seen too many average temperature graphs that only run ten years yet try to forecast the next hundred years; not to mention they forecast on trend lines only and not actual planetary conditions and events. I've seen graphs of stocks "nosediving" where the Y-axis bounds are between 90 and 120 points.
Far too much stock is taken in "normal" temperature anyway. The local news said today's high temp would be "almost normal." That would still make it abnormal, so I should panic. And if it's 80 degrees in Podunk on May 25 2000, why should it have to be 80 degrees on May 25 2030?
Reading the comments in Dr. Roy Spencer's blog, I'm convinced climatologists aren't anywhere near as capable of predicting climate as people give them credit for. Put a dozen in a room and you won't find any two who agree on everything.
/vent
He made the movie right after he invested in Green Mountain Energy.
Is it just me or does Pocahontas look like a tranny in the thumbnail?
She's been a "homely White woman" for a long time. And an insufferable communist too.
Why would I listen to this ivy league Jew?