it confirms everything is just flavors of marxism. feminism is marxism for women. environmentalism is marxism for non-westerners, black activism is marxism for blacks, etc etc, all against white western Christendom.
you cant think about this as factual or in any way backed by "muh science". This is just narrative pushing again, as always. And again, as always, the biggest enemy of marxists are straight white men.
I can't tell if NYP author is subtly taking the piss out of the 'researchers' or is just too deep in to realise how dumb it all sounds..
I mean if we want the biggest environmental impacts, there is only ONE factor that eclipses men, women or even the industrial revolution.
Communism. The Aral Sea, Kyshtym, Chernobyl, the full impact of the three gorges dam and China in general. They have caused such damage to the environment that it will take centuries to reverse.
Then just look at socialism in general especially under the 'green' banner from wind turbines that can't be recycled and damage both bird and ocean life. Solar panels that are wasted being placed on land than rooftops to refusing nuclear power leading to Germany ripping up their country side for coal. THAT'S the biggest factor not 'Men vs Women, who's worse?'
Starbucks cups, tampon waste, and birth control chemicals in the waste water that ends up in rivers, lakes, and oceans--I say women are more environmentally destructive.
They found that, on average, men have a larger impact due to their patterns of “consumption, especially travel, transportation, tourism and meat eating,” per the study.
“Men consume more meat than women and are leaders of the animal–industrial complex,” the researchers write. “Meat consumption remains part of hegemonic masculinity across many contexts.”
Guys are more likely to be involved in non-green activities, researchers claim.
Per the study, these so-called masculine pastimes include “owning, managing, controlling heavy, chemical, carbon–based, industrialized agriculture, high environmental impact and extractive industries, and of course militarism, with its own devastating environmental effects.”
And while the scientists don’t single out any particular subset of men, they claim that the “destructive ecological and social processes” are largely driven by “privileged eurowestern countries, particularly elite white men.”
Researchers went on to call men out for their lack of involvement in green politics, particularly as compared to women.
“Among vocal and influential masculinities, especially far–right political elites, climate denialism often combines with misogyny,” the researchers write.
In October, renowned climate change doom-monger Bill Gates declared that worldwide temperatures increase “will not lead to humanity’s demise” — a stunning reversal from his prior claims.
In October, renowned climate change doom-monger Bill Gates declared that worldwide temperatures increase “will not lead to humanity’s demise” — a stunning reversal from his prior claims.
Researchers went on to call men out for their lack of involvement in green politics, particularly as compared to women.
Not sure about other countries but here in my country, "green politics" means opposing nuclear power. The environmentalist lobby has caused more damage to the environment than the oil industry
Women just do it in a two faced way. Run through the world like a field of locusts and then bitch and moan at the men for not keeping it nice. Proper (i.e. intelligent white) men are capable of understanding that even if they are doing an unarguably gross activity that it's set up in such a way to be repeatable and sustainable for long periods of time. Case in point, sewers, water treatment, landfills, etc.
If it weren't for women and their inability to be happy, men would've been more than content to stay in caves and watch shadow puppets from the campfire.
Jokes on me for thinking I would see a real breakdown of consumer spending or the overgrowth of the east
aeromasculinities, fossilcapitalism, colonial extractivism, degrowth, ecofeminism, hydrofeminism, postcolonialism/decoloniality, new materialism,(post)colonial patriarchal racial capitalism,hegemonic masculinities,Capitalocene,military capitalism,Prefigurative ecological masculinities,‘Green fathering in the (m)Anthropocene’
The various, and changing, branches of ecofeminisms have shown that men (if a binary categorisation is used), and specific masculinities have solidified, sustained and benefited most from fossil-fuelled heteropatriarchy through strategies such as objectification of nature, gender hierarchisation, separation of body and mind, and segregation of differently marked bodies (e.g. Plumwood, Citation1993).
All the things women enjoy are made by or invented by 80% white men and 20% east asian men.. everything men do is mostly for their women/family. If whites, east asians, or even persians never existed and its only jeets, africans and south americans, women would be shitting in a hole next to their mud huts, having to carry jugs of water 5 miles every day while gangs of rapists roam around and every once in a while they get sacrificed to a god. Perhaps its what women want i guess..
i dont need to read it: its claim is men, particularly white men
DING! DING DING!
Jackpot! :D
Betting there were a lot of -bergs and -steins in that "certain group"
Not "particularly"... ONLY White Men! 😆
Men in China, India & Africa can do no wrongs! Muslim men too.
The Alarmists are nothing if not true idiots who believe anything they are told.
it confirms everything is just flavors of marxism. feminism is marxism for women. environmentalism is marxism for non-westerners, black activism is marxism for blacks, etc etc, all against white western Christendom.
Women are responsible for 80% of consumption when you realize most consumption men do is to acquire women.
you cant think about this as factual or in any way backed by "muh science". This is just narrative pushing again, as always. And again, as always, the biggest enemy of marxists are straight white men.
It's true but you won't find the mainstream media and soyence discussing it.
And the rest is what we do when we can't acquire women.
I can't tell if NYP author is subtly taking the piss out of the 'researchers' or is just too deep in to realise how dumb it all sounds..
I mean if we want the biggest environmental impacts, there is only ONE factor that eclipses men, women or even the industrial revolution.
Communism. The Aral Sea, Kyshtym, Chernobyl, the full impact of the three gorges dam and China in general. They have caused such damage to the environment that it will take centuries to reverse.
Then just look at socialism in general especially under the 'green' banner from wind turbines that can't be recycled and damage both bird and ocean life. Solar panels that are wasted being placed on land than rooftops to refusing nuclear power leading to Germany ripping up their country side for coal. THAT'S the biggest factor not 'Men vs Women, who's worse?'
I've seen how much my wife orders shit from Amazon to know this is completely false.
Starbucks cups, tampon waste, and birth control chemicals in the waste water that ends up in rivers, lakes, and oceans--I say women are more environmentally destructive.
Yeah, how dare they grow the food that society needs to survive.
The article can't seem to decide whether it's focusing on consumption or production.
Ah yes, the renowned masculine hobby: farming 5000 acres.
Thats just his hobby bro, his real passion is juggling debt to keep it all afloat.
It's focusing on White male bashing.
jevv owned media and universities propagate the hatred of white men, a shocker to no one who has been paying attention for the last 20 years.
Cults always despise apostates.
They make exceptions for ones that throw around billions of dollars to their pet causes.
Not sure about other countries but here in my country, "green politics" means opposing nuclear power. The environmentalist lobby has caused more damage to the environment than the oil industry
Ofc its men, look at all the evil jewish men destroying the planet with their various schemes like climate change and feminism
Women just do it in a two faced way. Run through the world like a field of locusts and then bitch and moan at the men for not keeping it nice. Proper (i.e. intelligent white) men are capable of understanding that even if they are doing an unarguably gross activity that it's set up in such a way to be repeatable and sustainable for long periods of time. Case in point, sewers, water treatment, landfills, etc.
If it weren't for women and their inability to be happy, men would've been more than content to stay in caves and watch shadow puppets from the campfire.
Repeal the 19th.
Jokes on me for thinking I would see a real breakdown of consumer spending or the overgrowth of the east
blame china and india by name or you're just trying to genocide white men
I know the actual answer but I also know the lying propaganda
All the things women enjoy are made by or invented by 80% white men and 20% east asian men.. everything men do is mostly for their women/family. If whites, east asians, or even persians never existed and its only jeets, africans and south americans, women would be shitting in a hole next to their mud huts, having to carry jugs of water 5 miles every day while gangs of rapists roam around and every once in a while they get sacrificed to a god. Perhaps its what women want i guess..