Japanese indie adult game developer says local bank blocked their overseas revenue transfers despite legal compliance, citing un...
Japanese indie adult game dev Ren recently announced that all revenue-related transactions from overseas had been suspended by their bank.
This isn't a banking problem, it is a credit card processing problem, specifically Visa and Mastercard. They can threaten the credit card processing abilities of banks, and banks cannot risk alienating credit card processing for their customers, so they have to do what Visa and MC want.
Gab CEO Andrew Torba said years ago that he wasn't even able to get a personal Visa debit card, let alone get any CC processing for Gab, because Visa threatened to terminate CC processing for any bank he had an account with.
Correct.
A big question I have is whether all the politicians who were elected on weeb / otaku culture have actually been faithful to their constituents (and unsurprisingly been squashed by their peers) at combatting the Western interference.
We only hear about their bid and aspirations but not the day-to-day drudgery, assuming they tried to keep their promises.
From what I hear, they seem to be having a slow impact since the Japanese government seems to realise how much revenue and cultural popularity their media has so are being very anti censorship and even mentioned payment processors as one of the problems.
From what I've read on Art Twitter, it's because the game has hypnosis, which is nonconsensual and le heckin' problematic.
Its incredible how Western govts who push troon shit on IRL kids can dedicate morality on a fucking 2D eruge
These aren't Western governments. It's their bosses.
Their owners are kikes
But they are complicit in enforcing their will
So using careful words on impressionable people to make them act in a manner contrary to their best interests, but convince them that it is a proper way of life they now follow, is now a bad thing? Got it, but someone should really tell the LGBT movement.
It's fiction, the characters that "aren't consenting" don't exist, no one is being hurt
Thats outright theft and encouraging copyright piracy... Sue the processing agencies on those grounds.
i don't feel that i have anything to gain from defending those following the footsteps of the likes of Al Goldstein. defending people to the death, people who would see me and my kids addicted to their pornography, over some forgotten notion of free speech is what got us in this mess.
So cool seeing democrats defending their nigger-in-chief's Operation Chokepoint here. Firearms should also be banned by credit card companies according to you.
kind of a retarded jump to make. by this logic, you are in favor of letting jews do whatever they want so we can all be free. surely we can both avoid jumping to these dumb conclusions and realize that the payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers, who ultimately make media that psychologically castrates people and lowers testosterone in young boys and men, is a mistake that benefits us.
as for the "but it's a power grab and gets us used to jewish corporations controlling what we buy" argument that inevitably fuels your side of the debate, i think it's completely invalidated by the fact that corporations and govts already do that. they can already close your bank account, even in America many types of guns are illegal, buying large amounts of fertilizer in the middle of an urban city is going to get you a knock at the door, etc... you already aren't free. porn ending up banned, if anything, is a step towards us being freer, not more restricted.
. you are in favor of letting jews do whatever they want so we can all be free
Says the guy arguing that (((credit card))) companies are the correct arbiter of morality.
no, i am. and i say banning porn is good. if a jew, like one running a credit card company, does it, then i say he is retarded and didn't get the memo that porn keeps us docile, but i'm also happy it happened because i would have done the same were i in charge of the banks.
your way of thinking is basically letting anyone who knows how you work reverse psychology you into doing anything they want... tomorrow if jews want you to support the degenerate weed-and-prostitutes clubs in Amsterdam all they have to do is film a feminist sperging out about how it's a sign of the patriarchy and get you triggered and basically arguing against yourself just because a "feminist" angered you, am i wrong? what other complete degeneracies and pits of depravity oould i get you to agree with just because you've decided you're all butthurt about my posts online?
If you want to ban porn, man up and do it. Stop enabling unelected practically anonymous corporate managers to determine what people can and cannot purchase. Today it's porn and guns, tomorrow it's meat and gasoline.
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.
I do not recommend that anyone playor watch anything that leads to cooming due to health risks. However Japanese coomer stuff is made by independent creators, not jews.
If anything it is the canary in the coal mine on the tools that will be used to control markets in the very near future.
Bitcoin solves this
No, it doesn't. And if you don't know this by now, it's probably not ignorance or incompetence, but malice.
Bitcoin is limited to about half a million on-chain transactions daily, which is multiple orders of magnitude too low to function as a means of transaction globally or even nationally. And don't even try to bring up exchanges; those have all the same problems that the banks/credit card companies do.
Layer 2 and 3 solve the transaction problem.
You only need to close those channels for final settlement.