i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.